TY - CPAPER T1 - The Granites Callie Mine - Justification and Design of a Mine Cooling Plant Suitable for Wet or Dry Condensing T2 - Deep Mining 2007: Fourth International Seminar on Deep and High Stress Mining AU - Howes, MJ AU - Clarke, B ED - Potvin, Y A2 - Potvin, Y DA - 2007/11/07 PY - 2007 PB - Australian Centre for Geomechanics PP - Perth CY - Perth C1 - Perth SP - 451 EP - 461 AB - The justification for the amount of cooling currently installed and for future expansions at Callie mine at the Granites is based on the application of a heat stress management strategy where a requirement to relocate personnel or impose a work-rest regimen is limited to less than 10% of the summer period. A limiting wet bulb temperature of 30.5°C generally means that the stop work condition of 32.5°C wet bulb does not occur and interruptions to productive mining and development are reduced to acceptable values. Callie mine in the Tanami desert has a water supply that is mainly bore water pumped from a palaeochannel 22 km from the mine and consequently subject to environmental pressures to minimise the amount used. Over a typical summer, wet condensing heat rejection for the cooling plant using conventional methods has a water consumption of between 9.0 Ml/MWR and 12.0 Ml/MWR from both evaporation and the bleed off necessary to maintain the quality of water. Condensation of moisture in the bulk air cooler provides approximately 1.8 Ml/MWR which helps to offset the water losses. The capacity and integrity of the bore field water supply line is not sufficient to guarantee sufficient supply of water to the refrigeration plant and captured rain water from adjacent pits is required as backup to meet the wet condensing requirements. While the pit water is normally available, supply could be compromised due to previous pit wall instability and potential loss of access to the pit pumps. Lack of rainfall could also result in insufficient stored water to supply the plant. These issues encouraged a hybrid condenser design where both wet and dry condensing was possible to allow the plant to continue to run if water was not available. Dry condensing can eliminate water losses however, because the condensing temperature then depends on dry bulb rather than wet bulb, the condensing temperature and therefore the compressor power is higher. For a typical summer, the increased power is 0.25 million kWh/MWR which is a significant with generated power costing up to A$ 0.28/kWh depending on the cost of diesel fuel. Normally, wet condensing would be used with dry condensing as a back up in the event that there was insufficient stored water. With compressor motors that are 25% larger than normal, the plant should be able to provide 87.5% of the summer mine cooling load when operating dry. UR - https://papers.acg.uwa.edu.au/p/711_33_Howes/ ER - DO - 10.36487/ACG_repo/711_33