Authors: Cristescu, B; Stenhouse, GB; Symbaluk, M; Boyce, MS


Cite As:
Cristescu, B, Stenhouse, GB, Symbaluk, M & Boyce, MS 2011, 'Land-use planning following resource extraction – lessons from grizzly bears at reclaimed and active open pit mines', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & A Beersing (eds), Mine Closure 2011: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 207-217,

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero

Gauging the success of industrial reclamation requires targets to be set for restoring ecosystem structure and function. An indication of reclamation success is if wildlife recolonise, forage, rest, reproduce and survive on reclaimed areas. The grizzly bear is a threatened species that exists at low densities in Alberta, Canada and facilitates a variety of ecosystem processes. To make suggestions for mitigating the effects of open pit mining on this species, we collected and analysed biological data for grizzly bears on and around Cheviot, Luscar and Gregg River coal mines in west-central Alberta. During 2008–2010, we captured and attached GPS radio collars on 12 adult bears on and around mines which allowed us to intensively track their movements. We visited bear-used GPS locations in the field to assess bear activity and microhabitat characteristics. Bears selected reclaimed mines and areas near mines extensively in late spring and early summer to forage on forbs sown as part of mine reclamation and to depredate ungulate calves and lambs. In the fall, bears moved primarily in areas outside mines to forage on berries in preparation for winter denning. Bears often bedded in dense tree cover which underlines the importance of maintaining original vegetation patches in planning mine operations. The animals sometimes crossed the major active mine haul road and moved on and near trails designated for human access on mine leases. High mortality risk associated with expansion of human access into previously remote areas is a major threat to long-term persistence of the grizzly bear population. Defensive driving and potentially enforcement of speed restrictions on mine haul roads in areas with high frequency of bear crossings, provisioning for ecological movement corridors and proper waste management practices will help prevent human-bear conflict during the active mining phase. Following closure of mines, access management along designated trails will reduce the risk of conflicts. Imposing access restrictions, along with preserving undisturbed habitat patches and restoring the original vegetation cover will enable coexistence of people and bears on a shared landscape.

Adams, L.G., Singer, F.J. and Dale, B.W. (1995) Caribou calf mortality in Denali National Park, Alaska, Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 59, pp. 584–594.
Alberta Grizzly Bear Recovery Team (2008) Alberta Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan 2008–2013, viewed 20 March 2011, –2008.pdf.
Ale, S.B. and Whelan, C.J. (2008) Reappraisal of the role of big, fierce predators! Biodiversity Conservation, Vol. 17, pp. 685–690.
Benn, B. and Herrero, S. (2002) Grizzly bear mortality and human access in Banff and Yoho National Parks, 1971–1998, Ursus, Vol. 13, pp. 213–221.
Bighorn Wildlife Technologies (2010) Cheviot and Luscar Mine Wildlife Inventory 2009, Teck Coal Limited, Cardinal River Operations, created for Teck Coal Limited, Cardinal River Operations Hinton, AB, by Bighorn Wildlife Technologies Ltd., Hinton, AB (confidential, cited with permission), 35 p.
Chetkiewicz, C-L.B., St. Clair, C.C. and Boyce, M.S. (2006) Corridors for conservation: Integrating pattern and process, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, Vol. 37, pp. 317–342.
Government of Alberta (2010) Status of the grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) in Alberta, viewed 20 March 2011, –Feb2010.pdf.
Grizzly Bear Inventory Team (2007) Alberta DNA population estimate reports 2004–2007, viewed 20 March 2011, .
Jansen, B.D., Krausman, P.R., Bristow, K.D., Heffelfinger, J.R. and deVos, J.C. Jr. (2009) Surface mining and ecology of desert bighorn sheep, Southwestern Naturalist, Vol. 54, pp. 430–438.
Johnson, C.J., Nielsen, S.E., Merrill, E.H., McDonald, T.L. and Boyce, M.S. (2006) Resource selection functions based on use-availability data: theoretical motivation and evaluation methods, Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 70, pp. 347–357.
Mattson, D.J. (1997) Use of ungulates by Yellowstone grizzly bears Ursus arctos, Biological Conservation, Vol. 81, pp. 161–177.
Munro, R.H.M., Nielsen, S.E., Price, M.H., Stenhouse, G.B. and Boyce, M.S. (2006) Seasonal and diel patterns of grizzly bear diet and activity in west-central Alberta, Journal of Mammalogy, Vol. 87, pp. 1112–1121.
Murphy, K.M., Felzien, G.S., Hornocker, M.G. and Ruth, T.K. (1998) Encounter competition between bears and cougars: some ecological implications, Ursus, Vol. 10, pp. 55–60.
Nielsen, S.E., Boyce, M.S. and Stenhouse, G.B. (2004a). Grizzly bears and forestry I. selection of clearcuts by grizzly bears in west-central Alberta, Canada, Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 199, pp. 51–65.
Nielsen, S.E., Herrero, S., Boyce, M.S., Mace, R.D., Benn, B., Gibeau, M.L. and Jevons, S. (2004b) Modelling the spatial distribution of human-caused grizzly bear mortalities in the Central Rockies ecosystem of Canada, Biological Conservation, Vol. 120, pp. 101–113.
Servheen, C., Herrero, S. and Peyton, B. (eds.) (1999) Status survey of the bears of the world and global conservation action plan, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
Tardiff, S.E. and Stanford, J.A. (1998) Grizzly bear digging: effects on subalpine meadow plants in relation to mineral nitrogen availability, Ecology, Vol. 79, pp. 2219–2228.
Weaver, J.L., Paquet, P.C. and Ruggiero, L.F. (1996) Resilience and conservation of large carnivores in the Rocky Mountains, Conservation Biology, Vol. 10, pp. 964–976.
Weir, J.N., Mahoney, S.P., McLaren, B. and Ferguson, S.H. (2007) Effects of mine development on woodland caribou Rangifer tarandus distribution, Wildlife Biology, Vol. 13, pp. 66–74.
Willson, M.F. and Gende, S.M. (2004) Seed dispersal by brown bears, Ursus arctos, in Southeastern Alaska, Canadian Field Naturalist, Vol. 118, pp. 499–503.
Wilmers, C.C., Crabtree, R.L., Smith, D.W., Murphy, K.M. and Getz, W.M. (2003) Trophic facilitation by introduced top predators: grey wolf subsidies to scavengers in Yellowstone National Park, Journal of Animal Ecology, Vol. 72, pp. 909–916.

© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to