Authors: Hawkes, VC


Cite As:
Hawkes, VC 2011, 'Early successional wildlife monitoring on reclamation plots in the Athabasca oil sands region', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & A Beersing (eds), Mine Closure 2011: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 229-237,

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero

Assessing the effectiveness of reclamation efforts to create wildlife habitat in the Athabasca oil sands region requires an assessment of wildlife use of reclaimed areas as well as the development of scientifically defensible and repeatable survey methods. The Cumulative Environmental Management Association (CEMA) is mandated to develop guidance documents for assessing reclamation effectiveness on oil sands leases. As part of a pilot study funded by CEMA to assess the use of early successional stands (i.e. those ranging in age from 4 to 17 years) by wildlife (songbirds, small mammals, and ungulates), a wildlife monitoring protocol was developed and field tested in 2010 and 2011. The purpose of this project was to (1) set standards upon which to base longer-term monitoring, and (2) identify wildlife groups that will indicate whether reclaimed ecosystems satisfy land use objectives, including the objective of returning wildlife to reclaimed habitats. The study achieved the following goals: 1) an assessment of the return and re-establishment of early successional wildlife to reclaimed terrestrial systems; 2) an assessment of the feasibility of the recommended protocols for monitoring wildlife on reclaimed terrestrial systems; 3) the development of recommendations for the wildlife appendix of the Guidelines for Reclamation to Forest Vegetation in the Athabasca oil sands region for early successional wildlife monitoring based on the monitoring programme results; and 4) the collection of monitoring data to assist in identifying and developing wildlife indicators for reclamation certification. Early indications suggest that the proposed methods are suitable for documenting wildlife use of reclaimed plots; however, the frequency and duration of monitoring needs to be increased to determine patterns of re-establishment and use by wildlife. A history of the reclamation sites included in the pilot study is provided along with an overview of the current status and use of those sites by wildlife. Recommendations regarding the programme scope and changes to the monitoring protocol in terms of frequency, duration, and study design are made. Ultimately, comparisons between reclaimed and natural stands of similar age should provide the necessary data to determine if wildlife use in reclaimed plots is comparable to that in natural stands.

Alberta Environment (AENV) (2010) Guidelines for Reclamation to Forest Vegetation in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region, 2nd Edition, Prepared by the Terrestrial Subgroup of the Reclamation Working Group of the Cumulative Environmental Management Association, Fort McMurray, AB.
Andersen, A.N. (1999) My bioindicator or yours? Making the selection, Journal of Insect Conservation, Vol. 3,
pp. 61–64.
Chase, M.K. and Guepel, G.R. (2005) The Use of Avian Focal Species for Conservation Planning in California, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-191, pp. 130–142.
Feinsinger, P. (2001) Designing field studies for biodiversity conservation, Island Press, Washington, DC.
Machmer, M. and Steeger, C. (2002) Effectiveness Monitoring Guidelines for Ecosystem Restoration, Ministry of Environment, Victoria, BC, 18 p.
Marcot, B.G. (1998) Selecting appropriate statistical procedures and asking the right questions: a synthesis, V. Sit and B. Taylor (eds), Statistical methods for adaptive management, Research Branch, B.C. Ministry of Forests, Victoria, B.C.
Mills, L.S. (1995) Edge effects and isolation: red-backed voles on forest remnants, Conservation Biology, Vol. 9, pp. 395–403.
Morrison, M.L. and Marcot, B.G. (1995) An evaluation of resource inventory and monitoring program used in national forest planning, Environmental Management, Vol. 19, pp. 147–156.
Nelson Jr., L. and Clark, R.W. (1973) Correction for sprung traps in catch/effort calculations of trapping results, Journal of Mammalogy, Vol. 54, pp. 295–298.
Noon, B.R. (2003) Conceptual issues in monitoring ecological resources, D.E. Busch and J.C. Trexler (eds), Monitoring Ecosystems: Interdisciplinary Approaches for Evaluating Ecoregional Initiatives, Island Press, Washington.
Noss, R.F. and Cooperrider, A.Y. (1994) Saving Nature’s Legacy: Protecting and Restoring Biodiversity, Island Press, Washington, DC, 380 p.
Yahner, R.H. (1988) Changes in wildlife communities near edges, Conservation Biology, Vol. 2, pp. 333–339.

© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to