Long term closure planning for an evolving mine site – a case study of Newmont Boddington Gold Mine in Western Australia

Authors: De Sousa, K; Amoah, N Download Paper

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1208_24_Amoah

Cite As:
De Sousa, K & Amoah, N 2012, 'Long term closure planning for an evolving mine site – a case study of Newmont Boddington Gold Mine in Western Australia', in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2012: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 251-264, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1208_24_Amoah



Abstract:
Newmont Boddington Gold (NBG) mine is located 12 km northwest of the town of Boddington and about 120 km southeast of Perth in Western Australia (WA). Open pit mining of an oxide gold resource commenced at the operations in 1987. In 2008, NBG undertook an expansion program to increase future gold production to one million ounces per annum, potentially becoming the largest gold mine in Australia. Critical to the life cycle of such a large mining operation is the need to ensure that mine closure is well planned in advance and consistently managed throughout operation to minimise future liabilities. For example, the large quantities of waste (waste rock estimated to be over one billion tonnes over the life of the mine), vast open pits and areas for tailings storage and site operational facilities, geographically and ecologically sensitive location and socio-economic issues will all become significant legacy factors during mine closure and post closure stages. To mitigate closure liabilities, Newmont’s internal guidelines have strict requirements for the development and review of closure plans at all stages of mine life with annual analyses of closure liability costs. This is to ensure consistency with life of mine (LOM) plans, changes in operations, stakeholder expectations, regulatory requirements etc. However, planning and managing closure for such a large, complex and evolving mine poses challenges. The recent changes to the mine closure planning guidelines in WA, rapidly changing community expectations and Newmont’s growth plans add to the complexities. The paper discusses the on-going activities for an integrated life of mine and closure planning approach that will ensure that operational decisions are consistent with closure requirements and environmentally sustainable operation of the mine to minimise long-term liabilities. How recent closure planning activities have assisted in optimising the design and operation of the expanded mine, especially in the areas of waste rock landform location, size and capping will be presented. Closure planning activities such as knowledge gap analysis, risk analysis-based approach to prioritising activities and development of completion criteria as well as current studies and investigations to address knowledge gaps in waste rock geochemistry, post closure facilities management, closure water management, rehabilitation trials, tailings decommissioning plans, closure cost estimating and financial provisions for closure liabilities are discussed.

References: