Authors: Kaiser, PK; Cai, M


Cite As:
Kaiser, PK & Cai, M 2013, 'Critical review of design principles for rock support in burst-prone ground – time to rethink!', in Y Potvin & B Brady (eds), Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Underground Construction, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 3-37.

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
In the 1980s, severe rockbursting in underground mines, in Canada, Chile, South Africa, and other countries, caused many fatalities and was recognised as an unacceptable work place hazard. Since then huge advances have been made in seismic monitoring, energy release control by improved mining methods, ground control with innovative and effective rock support systems, and advanced risk hazard management procedures. As a result, many burst-prone mines have achieved outstanding safety records and the industry has benefited by developing means of accessing highly stressed orebodies at depth. In 1995, the Canadian Rockburst Research Program was completed and guidelines for rock support selection were published. Since then many researchers around the world have further advanced the state-of-the-art of support selection and many entrepreneurs have provided industry with a sophisticated tool box full of effective rock retention and support components and systems. Most of these advances and the design of these tools, however, are based on some fundamental assumptions, i.e. that seismic events create ground motions that damage excavations, and thus load and potentially damage the ground support. It is therefore often implied that the source of energy which causes damage stems from mining-induced seismic events. In this paper, we critically assess the support design guiding principle, which leads to the identification of three facts with serious practical implications: (1) standard, assumed ground motion patterns are unacceptably flawed; (2) ground motion-related energy transfer mechanisms rarely constitute the main source of support loading; and (3) dynamically stressed rock fails by brittle, extensional failure causing disproportional excavation convergences and support damaging deformations. The keynote papers presented at this symposium in Australia and at the Eighth International Symposium on Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines in Russia describe these flaws and recent advances to overcome related deficiencies. It is concluded that the primary damage mechanism often is a seismically triggered strainburst or a dynamically loaded strainburst, and damage is rarely dominated by momentum transfer or dynamic shaking. Consequently, rockburst damage is primarily related to the state of stress and the local mine stiffness at the potential damage location and not or only indirectly related to the seismic ground motion. Field evidence is used to illustrate and support this interpretation.

References:
Cai, M. and Kaiser, P.K. (2013) A Guide to Rockburst Support Selection (unpublished; for release in 2013/24).
Cai, M., Kaiser, P.K. and Duff, D. (2012) Rock support design in burst-prone ground utilizing an interactive design tool, in Proceedings 46th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, 24–27 June 2012, Chicago, ARMA, Virginia, 9 p.
Cai, M. and Kaiser, P.K. (2011) Rock support for deep tunnels in highly stressed rocks, in Proceedings 12th ISRM Congress, Y. Zhou (ed), 18–21 October 2011, Beijing, China, pp. 1467–1472.
Cai, M., Champaigne, D. and Kaiser, P.K. (2010) Development of a fully debonded conebolt for rockburst support, in Proceedings Fifth International Seminar on Deep and High Stress Mining (Deep Mining 2010), M. Van Sint Jan and Y. Potvin (eds), 6–8 October 2010, Santiago, Chile, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 329–342.
Cai, M. and Kaiser, P.K. (2007) The role of rock support in highly stressed ground support design and selection rationale, Phase-I Report submitted to Rio Tinto, Geomechanics Research Centre, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, 36 p.
Diederichs, M.S., Carvalho, J.L. and Carter, T.G. (2007) A modified approach for prediction of strength and post yield behaviour for high GSI rock masses in strong, brittle ground, in Proceedings 1st Canada-U.S. Rock Mechanics Symposium, 27–31 May 2007, Vancouver Canada, pp. 249–257.
Diederichs, M.S. (2003) Rock fracture and collapse under low confinement conditions, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Vol. 36(5), pp. 339–381.
Heal, D., Potvin, Y. and Hudyma, M. (2006) Evaluating rockburst damage potential in underground mining, in Proceedings 41st U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS), 17–21 June 2006, Golden, USA, 12 p.
Hoek, E., Kaiser, P.K. and Bawden, W.F. (1995) Support of Underground Excavations in Hard Rock, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 215 p.
Kaiser, P.K. (2005) Tunnel stability in highly stressed, brittle ground – Rock mechanics considerations for Alpine tunnelling, Geologie und Geotechnik der Basistunnels, in Proceedings Geological AlpTransit Symposium (GEAT’05), 26–30 September 2005, Zürich, Switzerland, pp. 183–201.
Kaiser, P.K. (2006) Rock mechanics considerations for construction of deep tunnels in brittle rock, in Proceedings 4th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium, C.F. Leung and Y.X. Zhou (eds), 8–10 November 2006, Singapore, pp. 47–58.
Kaiser, P.K. and Cai, M. (2013a) Critical review of design principles for rock support in burst-prone ground? Time to rethink!, in Proceedings Seventh International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Underground Construction, Y. Potvin and B. Brady (eds), 13–15 May 2013, Perth, Australia, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 3–38.
Kaiser, P.K. and Cai, M. (2013b) Rockburst damage mechanisms and support design principles, Keynote at RaSiM8, Russia, to be submitted.
Kaiser, P.K., Vasak, P., Suorineni, F.T. and Thibodeau, D. (2005) New dimensions in seismic data interpretation with 3-D virtual reality visualization in burst-prone ground, in Proceedings Sixth International Symposium on Rockburst and Seismicity in Mines (RaSiM6), Y. Potvin and M. Hudyma (eds), 9–11 March 2005, Perth, Australia, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 33−47.
Kaiser, P.K., Diederichs, M.S., Martin, C.D., Sharp, J. and Steiner, W. (2000) Underground Works in Hard Rock Tunnelling and Mining, in Proceedings International Conference on Geotechnical and Geological Engineering (GeoEng2000), 19–24 November 2000, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 841–926.
Kaiser, P.K. and Maloney, S.M. (1997) Scaling laws for the design of rock support, Pure and Applied Geophysics, Vol. 150(3–4), pp. 415–434.
Kaiser, P.K., McCreath, D.R. and Tannant, D.D. (1996) Canadian Rockburst Support Handbook, Mining Research Directorate, Sudbury, Canada, 314 p. also Drift support in burst-prone ground. CIM Bulletin, Vol. 89(998), pp. 131–138.
Madariaga, R. (1976) Dynamics of an expending circular fault, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 66, pp. 639–666.
Martin, C.D., Kaiser, P.K. and McCreath, D.R. (1999) Hoek–Brown parameters for predicting the depth of brittle failure around tunnels, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 36(1), pp. 136–151.
Martin, C.D. (1997) Seventeenth Canadian Geotechnical Colloquium: The effect of cohesion loss and stress path on brittle rock strength, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 34(5), pp. 698–725.
McGarr, A. (1984) Scaling of ground motion parameters, state of stress, and focal depth, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 89, pp. 6969–6979.
Salamon, M.D.G. (1970) Stability, instability, and design of pillar workings, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 7, pp. 613–631.
Trollope, D.H. (1968) The Mechanics of Discontinua or Clastic Mechanics in Rock Problems, Rock Mechanics in Engineering Practice, K.G. Stagg and O.C. Zienkiewicz (eds), John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 275–320.




© Copyright 2019, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries to or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au