Authors: Bidwell, A; Knight, A; Anderson, WS


DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1308_58_Bidwell

Cite As:
Bidwell, A, Knight, A & Anderson, WS 2013, 'Geotechnical risk management at Teck Coal', in PM Dight (ed.), Proceedings of the 2013 International Symposium on Slope Stability in Open Pit Mining and Civil Engineering, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 841-852, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1308_58_Bidwell

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
The first standardised Geotechnical Assessment Process for identifying and assessing geotechnical risks at Teck Coal’s open pit mining operations was developed and implemented in 2012. This work was started as a corporate initiative because Teck, as a publicly traded company, desired to demonstrate industry-best practices for managing geotechnical risks and to develop Teck Coal corporate geotechnical standards. Furthermore, corporate geotechnical standards and a consistently high level of geotechnical practice are required as part of the safe and profitable execution of the potential expansions at Teck Coal’s operating sites and the possible development of additional mines. This paper describes the three stage Geotechnical Assessment Process – the application of an assessment tool to scrutinise the geotechnical aspects of mine design, operation and closure, the categorisation and ranking of identified geotechnical risks, and the development of action plans to mitigate the risks. The assessment tool was developed in-house because there were no suitable published or publicly-available procedures. The risk categorisation and ranking procedure was adapted from the existing Teck stage gating process used for major projects. The ranked risks were grouped by common themes, and then used as the basis for developing site-specific ‘Project Initiatives’ that list actionable steps to ensure that each site’s geotechnical systems and processes are aligned with Teck Coal’s emerging standardised approach for identifying and managing the geotechnical risks at existing operations and for potential expansions.

References:
British Columbia Mine Waste Rock Pile Research Committee, 1991 Mined Rock and Overburden Piles Investigation and Design Manual Interim Guidelines
Dixon, R.A., Johnson, T.M., de Graaf, P.J.H., Wessels, S.D.N. and Venter, J. (2011) Risk based geotechnical slope reconciliation at Rio Tinto Iron Ore, Pilbara Operations, in Proceedings International Symposium on Rock Slope Stability in Open Pit Mining and Civil Engineering (Slope Stability 2011), E. Eberhardt and D. Stead (eds), 18–21 September 2011, Vancouver, Canada, Canadian Rock Mechanics Association, Canada, CD-rom only.
Eaton, T. (2000) Operation and monitoring considerations from a British Columbia mountain terrain perspective, in Slope Stability in Surface Mining, W.A. Hustrulid, M.K. McCarter and D.J.A. Van Zyl (eds), Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, pp. 311–321.
Hamman, E.C.F. (2009) Qualitative geotechnical hazard and risk assessment, in Proceedings International Symposium on Rock Slope Stability in Open Pit Mining and Civil Engineering (Slope Stability 2009), 9–11 November 2009, Santiago, Chile, CD-rom only.
Stacey, P. (2009) Fundamentals of slope design, in Guidelines for Open Pit Slope Design, J. Read and P. Stacey (eds), CRC Press/Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 1–14.




© Copyright 2020, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au