Authors: Humphries, RN


DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1352_29_Humphries

Cite As:
Humphries, RN 2013, 'The requirement and implications of evidence-based restoration schemes in the United Kingdom', in M Tibbett, AB Fourie & C Digby (eds), Mine Closure 2013: Proceedings of the Eighth International Seminar on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Cornwall, pp. 355-361, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1352_29_Humphries

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Over the past two decades, ‘evidence-based’ decision making has become a universally established process for those developing and evaluating government policy and regulation. Although the process originated in the delivery of health care, it is has been widely applied in the UK to include natural resource management and more recently extended to the delivery of mine closure schemes. This has resulted in a fundamental, but largely unsaid, change in the approach of planning authorities and regulators to the development control of mine restoration schemes in the UK. Traditionally, this took the form of a report describing the nature and characteristics of the restored site on the completion of the restoration works. Only at this late point in the delivery of the restoration were schemes judged as being fit or unfit for purpose. In contrast, the evidence-based approach is applied early in the planning process and before consent is granted, and is concerned with the certainty (likelihood) that schemes will be delivered. This requires the applicant to provide verified example Case or Pilot Studies of successful schemes that have been achieved in similar situations and by similar methods. This is particularly the case where UK Priority Habitats are proffered as replacements for losses or gains as a result of proposed mining schemes. Given this, the industry should expect to be challenged by both planning authorities and regulators. This paper discusses the implications for the mining industry and the need for a national repository of Case and Pilot studies and suggests the type of data to be collected to enable independent and objective review.

References:
Banks, G. (2009) Challenges of Evidence-Based Policy-Making, Commonwealth Government of Australia, Brisbane, viewed 27 April 2013, .
Bennett, N. (2007) A partnership approach – The role and work of the National Minerals and Nature Conservation Forum, in Mineral Extraction and Wetland Creation, R. Meade and N. Humphries (eds), Natural England, Peterborough, pp. 29–30.
British Coal (1988) A Seminar on Land Reclamation, British Coal Opencast Executive, Eastwood.
Cabinet Office (1999a) White Paper: Modernising Government, Her Majesty’s Government, London.
Cabinet Office (1999b) Professional Policy-Making for the Twenty First Century, Her Majesty’s Government, London.
Campbell Collaboration (2013) .
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (2013) MAVIS, Lancaster, UK, .
Cochrane, A.L. (1972) Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random Reflections on the Health Services, Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, London.
Communities and Local Government (2012) National Planning Policy Framework, London, UK, viewed 27 April 2013, .
Convention on Biological Diversity (2013) The Convention on Biological Diversity, viewed 27 April 2013, .
Davies, P. (2004) Is Evidence-Based Government Possible? The Jerry Lee Lecture, 4th Annual Campbell Collaboration Colloquium. Washington D.C.
Defra (2013) Biodiversity Action Reporting System (BARS2), viewed 27 April 2013, .
Department of the Environment (1996) Mineral Planning Guidance 7: Reclamation of Mineral Workings, HMSO, London, UK, viewed 27 April 2013, .
Doick, K.J. (2010) Learning lessons in monitoring brownfield land regeneration to green-space through logic-modelling, in Restoration and Recovery: Regenerating Land and Communities, H.R. Fox and H.M. Moore (eds), Whittles Publishing, Dunbeath, pp. 16–26.
Gray, J.A.M. (1997) Evidence-Based Healthcare: How to Make Health Policy and Management Decisions, Churchill Livingstone, New York.
Guldermond, R.A.R., Grainger, M.J. and Trimble, M.J. (2012) Where is the evidence for assessing evidence-based restoration? Comments on Ntshotsho et al. (2010), Restoration Ecology, Vol. 20(1), pp. 7–9.
Hill, M.O. (1991) TABLEFIT Software, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Monks Wood, viewed 27 April 2013, .
Humphries, R.N. (2000) An evaluative methodology for reclamation achievement & techniques, in Proceedings of the 17th Annual National Conference of the American Society for Surface Mining and Reclamation, W.L. Daniels and S.G. Richardson (eds),Tampa, Florida, USA, pp. 345–352.
Humphries, R.N. (2012) The emerging requirement for an evidence based certainty for the delivery of restoration schemes in mineral planning applications in the UK, in Proceedings Annual National Meeting of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation: Sustainable Reclamation, R.I. Barnhisel (editor), Tupelo, Mississippi, USA, pp. 286–303.
Humphries, R.N. (2013) Is the definition of scale the key to our understanding and delivery of the components of structure, diversity and function in the restoration of ecosystems? Presented at 2013 National Meeting of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation, Laramie, Wyoming, USA, 24 p.
Humphries, R.N. and Benyon, P.R. (1999) Standard criteria and methods to assess the reclamation of native vegetation on mined land, in Proceedings of 16th Annual National Conference of the American Society of Surface Mining and Reclamation, S.A. Bengson and D.M. Bland (eds), Scottsdale, Arizona, USA, pp. 72–80.
Humphries, N. and Meade, R. (2007) Design and reporting criteria for reed bed and fen restoration in mineral workings – Scope and opportunities, in Mineral Extraction and Wetland Creation, R. Meade and N. Humphries (eds), Natural England, Peterborough, pp. 12–28.
Humphries, R.N., Rowell, T.A. and Leverton, R.E. (1984) Evaluation of techniques for the reclamation of tips and lagoons, in Symposium on the Reclamation, Treatment and Utilisation of Coal Mining Wastes, A.K.M. Rainbow (ed), National Coal Board, London, pp. 23.1–23.9.
Joint Nature Conservation Committee (2012) UK Post-2010 Biodiversity Framework, Defra, London.
Joint Nature Conservation Committee (2013a) Joint Nature Conservation Committee, viewed 27 April 2013, .
Joint Nature Conservation Committee (2013b) National Vegetation Classification, viewed 27 April 2013, .
Joint Nature Conservation Committee (2013c) Common Standards Monitoring, viewed 28 April 2013, .
Malloch, A.J.C. (1990) MATCH, Unit of Vegetation Science, University of Lancaster, Lancaster LA1 4YQ. 177, UK.
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (2000) Good Practice Guide for Handling Soils, viewed 27 April 2013, .
Moffatt, A. and McNeill, J. (1994) Bulletin 110: Reclaiming Disturbed Land for Forestry, HMSO, London, UK.
National Assembly for Wales (2001) Mineral Planning Policy Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Ntshotsho, P., Reyers, B. and Esler, K.J. (2011) Assessing the evidence base for restoration in South Africa, Restoration Ecology, Vol. 19(5), pp. 578–586.
Parliamentary Office of Science & Technology (2011) POST Note PN 379: Evidence-based Conservation, House of Parliament, London.
Pullin, A.S. and Knight, T.M. (2009) Doing more good than harm – Building an evidence-base for conservation and environmental management, Biological Conservation, Vol. 142, pp. 931–934.
Regional Planning & Transportation Division (2001) Shaping Our Future, Northern Ireland Department of the Environment, Belfast.
Rodwell, J.S. (2006) National Vegetation Classification: User’s Hand Book, Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough.
Sackett, D. (1996) Evidence-based medicine – What it is and what it isn’t, British Medical Journal, Vol. 312, pp. 71–72.
Scottish Government Directorate for the Built Environment (2009) National Planning Framework for Scotland, Edinburgh.
Street, E.A. (1985) Evaluation procedures for restored land, Environmental Geochemistry and Health, Vol. 7(2), pp. 56–63.
Sutherland, W.J., Pullin, A.S., Dolman, P.M. and Knight, T.M. (2004) The need for evidence-based conservation, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 19(6), pp. 305–308.
UK Government (2006) Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act, viewed 28 April 2013, .
UK National Ecosystem Assessment (2011) The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis of the key findings, UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
World Conservation Monitoring Centre (2013) Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool, United Nations Environment Programme, viewed 27 April 2013, .




© Copyright 2021, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au