Authors: Thomson, I

Paper is not available for download
Contact Us

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1352_39_Thomson

Cite As:
Thomson, I 2013, 'Key issues for socially responsible mine closure: a comparative examination of corporate policies and practice', in M Tibbett, AB Fourie & C Digby (eds), Mine Closure 2013: Proceedings of the Eighth International Seminar on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Cornwall, pp. 463-472, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1352_39_Thomson

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Since 2002, strong metal prices, notably for gold, have allowed mines previously projected to run out of ore to continue production from lower-grade material. As a result there have been relatively few mine closures in this period. During this same period, there has been an almost universal adoption of corporate social responsibility as the framework for social performance in response to sustained pressure from host communities, civil society, financial institutions and other stakeholders. The focus of effort has been on the criteria for socially responsible exploration, development and operation of new mines and corrective action on older mines. Closure has not received the same level of attention. The publicly available information on corporate policies and procedures for mine closure articulated by three major gold mining companies is examined together with their relationship to practical application, as demonstrated by recent mine closures or closure plans by the same companies. Qualitative analysis of the information is undertaken on a comparative basis and also with reference to evolving international norms for corporate social responsibility, including ISO26000. The paper highlights how individual companies articulate and implement their vision of responsible mine closure and throws light on how each company has arrived at its position.

References:
Barrick Peru (2013) viewed 14 June 2013, www.barrickperu.com/barrick/pierina.html‎.
Dashwood, H. (2012) The Rise of Global Corporate Social Responsibility, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 336 p.
ICMM (2011) International Council on Mining and Metals, Planning for Integrated Mine Closure Toolkit, London.
McCulloch, A. (2012) On shaky ground, Werewolf, Issue 40, 11 June 2013, viewed 27 June, .
MICLA (2013) McGill Research Group Investigating Canadian Mining in Latin America, San Martin, Honduras, viewed 14 June 2013, .
Newmont Waihi Gold (2013) viewed 14 June 2013, www.waihigold.co.nz.
Roldan, C.F. and Purvance, D. (2011) San Martin mine closure – from closure to sustainability, in Proceedings Sixth International Conference on Mine Closure (Mine Closure 2011), A.B. Fourie, M. Tibbett and A. Beersing (eds), 19‒21 September 2011, Lake Louise, Canada, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, Vol. 2, pp. 461–470.
Thomson, I. and MacDonald, A. (2001) Access to information: A key to building trust in the minerals sector – corporate communication standards, practice and issues, for Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
UNDP (2005) United Nations Development Programme, Mining for Closure: Policies and Guidelines for Sustainable Mining Practice and Closure of Mines, New York.
Vanclay, F. and Esteves, A.M. (2011) New Directions in Social Impact Assessment: Conceptual and Methodological Advances, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 416 p.
World Bank (2002) It’s Not Over When It’s Over: Mine Closure Around the World, Washington, DC.




© Copyright 2021, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au