Authors: Whitbread-Abrutat, PH; Kendle, AD; Coppin, NJ


DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1352_52_Whitbread-Abrutat

Cite As:
Whitbread-Abrutat, PH, Kendle, AD & Coppin, NJ 2013, 'Lessons for the mining industry from non-mining landscape restoration experiences', in M Tibbett, AB Fourie & C Digby (eds), Mine Closure 2013: Proceedings of the Eighth International Seminar on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Cornwall, pp. 625-639, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1352_52_Whitbread-Abrutat

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Mining is a temporary land use that can produce great economic value from a small physical footprint, although sometimes with an environmental and social footprint that can be devastated by the activity. Nevertheless, mining has the potential to create a foundation for real (sustainable) development in the locality and region around the mine. In this paper, landscape restoration is defined as the improvement of degraded environments on a large scale that enhances ecological integrity while improving peoples’ lives. There is a growing realisation in many parts of the world that only at a landscape level can restoration projects deliver the scale of environmental and socio-economic improvements that will contribute significantly to the provision of ecosystem services and the development of meaningful, long-term livelihood opportunities. This paper considers several world-class – yet non-mining – landscape restoration projects to extract signposts to good practice of relevance to the mining industry. How a mine integrates with the surrounding environmental and socio-economic landscapes plays a large part in determining its post-closure success. Typically, mine operators are proficient at considering this connectivity from a supply chain perspective during the development and operational phases. But closure is often an afterthought, with the company focussed primarily on reducing the ongoing environmental and public health and safety risks of the site itself. Despite the exertions of accepted good practice, little thought onsite and in the wider corporate body is usually given to the ecological/ social/ economic possibilities engendered by the ‘blank canvas’ of the post-mining landscape and its environs. The connectivity mentioned previously is, arguably, most important at this stage in order to maximise the mine’s success in terms of post-closure sustainability outcomes. This paper reviews accepted good industry practice in mine closure, summarising the pertinent points and addressing its limitations, and considers how good practice can be improved when pertinent lessons are extracted from non-mining landscape restoration projects. The ultimate aim is to address the silo thinking that occurs within the industry and to encourage the dismantling of barriers between mining and other land use disciplines.

References:
Anglo American (2013) Mine Closure Planning, viewed July 2013, .
Australian Government (2006a) Mine Closure and Completion, Leading Practice Sustainable Development Programme for the Mining Industry, Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources.
Australian Government (2006b) Mine Rehabilitation, Leading Practice Sustainable Development Programme for the Mining Industry, Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources.
Bai, Z.G., Dent, D.L., Olsson, L. and Schaepman, M.E. (2008) Proxy global assessment of land degradation: review article, Soil Use and Management, Vol. 24, pp. 223–234.
Center for Urban and Environmental Solutions at Florida Atlantic University (2009) The Economics of the Everglades Watershed and Estuaries, prepared for the Everglades Foundation.
EBRD (European Bank for Reconstruction and Development) (2008) Environmental and Social Policy (including Performance Requirements).
Equator Principles (2006) .
EU (European Union) (2006) EU Directive 2006/21/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 15 March 2006 on the management of waste form the extractive industries and the amending Directive 2004/35/EC, published in the Official Journal of the European Union, 11 April 2006 (L102/15).
EU (European Union) (2009) Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for Management of Tailings and Waste-Rock in Mining Activities, European Commission, Brussels.
Gardener, M.R. and Grenier, C. (2011) Linking livelihoods and conservation: challenges facing the Galapagos Islands, in Islands Futures: Conservation and Development across the Asia-Pacific Region. Springer, Chapter 6.
Hobbs, R.J. and Harris, J.A. (2001) Restoration ecology: repairing the earth’s ecosystems in the new millennium, Restoration Ecology, Vol. 9(2), pp. 239–246.
Hobbs, R.J. and Norton, D.A. (1996) Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology, Restoration Ecology, Vol. 4(2), pp. 93–110.
ICMM (International Council on Mining and Metals) (2006) Guidance Paper: Financial Assurance for Mine Closure and Reclamation, London.
ICMM (International Council on Mining and Metals) (2008) Planning for Integrated Mine Closure: Toolkit, London.
IFC (International Finance Corporation) (2012a) Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability, Washington, DC.
IFC (International Finance Corporation) (2012b) Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability: Guidance Notes, Washington, DC.
Janzen, D.H. (2000) Costa Rica’s Area de Conservacion Guanacaste: a long march to survival through non-damaging biodiversity and ecosystem development, in Norway/ UN Conference on the Ecosystem Approach for Sustainable Use of Biological Diversity, Norwegian Directorate for Nature Research and Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway, pp. 122−132.
Keith, D.A., Rodríguez, J.P., Rodríguez-Clark, K.M., Nicholson, E., Aapala, K., Alonso, A., Asmussen, M., Bachman, S., Basset, A., Barrow, E.G., Benson, J.S., Bishop, M.J., Bonifacio, R., Brooks, T.M., Burgman, M.A., Comer, P., Comín, F.A., Essl, F., Faber−Langendoen, D., Fairweather, P.G., Holdaway, R.J., Jennings, M., Kingsford, R.T., Lester, R.E., Mac Nally, R., McCarthy, M.A., Moat, J., Oliveira-Miranda M.A., Pisanu, P., Poulin, B., Regan, T.J., Riecken, U., Spalding, M.D. and Zambrano-Martínez, S. (2013) Scientific foundations for an IUCN Red List of ecosystems, PLoS ONE, Vol. 8(5): e62111.
Kulkarni, S.C., Levin-Rector, A., Ezzati, M. and Murray, C. (2011) Falling behind: life expectancy in US counties from 2000 to 2007 in an international context, Population Health Metrics, Vol. 9(16).
Lindberg, T.T., Bernhardt, E.S., Bier, R., Helton, A.M., Merola, R.B., Vengosh, A. and Di Guilo, R.T. (2011) Cumulative impacts of mountaintop mining on an Appalachian watershed, in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 108(52), pp. 20, 929–20,934.
Maginnis, S. and Jackson, W. (2007) What is FLR and how does it differ from current approaches? in The Forest Landscape Restoration Handbook, J. Rietbergen-McCracken, S. Maginnis and A. Sarre (eds), Earthscan, London.
Mather Economics (2010) Measuring the Economic Benefits of America’s Everglades Restoration, prepared for the Everglades Foundation.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Living Beyond Our Means: Natural Assets and Human Well-Being, Island Press, Washington, DC.
Nkonya, E., Gerber, N., von Braun, J. and de Pinto, A. (2011) Economics of Land Degradation. The Costs of Action Versus Inaction, Issue Brief 68, Center for Development Research, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
Peck, P. (2005) Mining for Closure: policies, practices and guidelines for sustainable mining practices and closure of mines, ENVSEC, UNEP, UNDP, OSCE, NATO.
Rio Tinto (2013) Closure Standard, viewed 29 July, .
SER (Society for Ecological Restoration International) (2004) Primer on Ecological Restoration, Version 2.
Whitbread-Abrutat, P.H. (2008) Mining Legacy Survey (for the ICMM-IUCN Dialogue on Mining and Biodiversity), Post-Mining Alliance, Eden Project, Cornwall, UK.
Whitbread-Abrutat, P.H. (2012) Exploring World Class Landscape Restoration, Travelling Fellowship Report, Winston Churchill Memorial Trust, unpublished, available at .
World Bank (2011) Sharing Mining Benefits in Developing Countries, Washington, DC.
World Bank Group (2007a) Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines for Mining, Washington, DC, .
World Bank Group (2007b) Environmental, Health and Safety General Guidelines, Washington, DC, .




© Copyright 2021, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au