Authors: Grabinsky, MW; Cheung, D; Bentz, E; Thompson, BD; Bawden, WF


DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1404_09_Grabinsky

Cite As:
Grabinsky, MW, Cheung, D, Bentz, E, Thompson, BD & Bawden, WF 2014, 'Advanced structural analysis of reinforced shotcrete barricades', in Y Potvin & T Grice (eds), Proceedings of the Eleventh International Symposium on Mining with Backfill, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 135-149, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1404_09_Grabinsky

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Several attempts have been made to assess the ultimate capacity, and sometimes the overall response, of cemented mine fill barricades. Many of these have incorporated elastic-plastic constitutive models which are known to be inferior when modelling non-linear plain or reinforced concrete behaviour. Furthermore, virtually all such studies have not systematically considered the surrounding host rock’s stiffness. This paper considers barricades with boundaries of both infinite and finite stiffness using advanced numerical analysis tools developed at the University of Toronto which have been specialised for reinforced concrete design in a civil engineering context. These peer-reviewed tools are internationally considered to be state-of-the-art. The first case considers the problem of modelling reinforced concrete barricades with infinitely stiff boundary conditions. A set of relevant, carefully controlled laboratory studies is reviewed and the numerical analysis technique is shown to be appropriate. Modelling is then carried out for the case of a barricade at Cayeli Mine where the loading was believed to be essentially fluid, and therefore the modelled boundary condition easily represented. The pre-peak load-deformation relationships are correlated between field monitoring and numerical model results with excellent agreement. The second case considers the problem of barricade boundaries with finite stiffness. Equations based on Timoshenko and Boussinesq solutions were developed to represent equivalent end restraints for the modelled barricade. A wide range of stiffness encompassing virtually all possible rock conditions was considered. Practicing mining engineers can use standardised underground mapping and rock mass classification techniques to determine what an appropriate end stiffness value would be for their mining conditions. It will be shown that barricade capacity varies significantly with host rock stiffness, and that the commonly made design assumption of a fully rigid boundary can result in unconservative over-prediction of barricade strength.

References:
ASTM International 2013, ASTM C191: Standard test methods for time of setting of hydraulic cement by Vicat needle, ASTM International, West Conshohocken.
Bentz, EC, Vecchio, FJ & Collins, MP 2006, ‘Simplified modified compression field theory for calculating shear strength of reinforced concrete elements’, ACI Structural Journal, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 614-24.
Bentz, EC 2014, ‘Response-2000’, University of Toronto, Toronto,
Cheung, A 2012, ‘Influence of rock boundary conditions on behaviour of arched and flat cemented paste backfill barricade walls’, Masters thesis, University of Toronto.
Galaa, A, Grabinsky, MW & Bawden, WF 2012, ‘Characterizing stiffness development in early age cemented paste backfills with sand in a non-destructive triaxial test’, Proceedings of the 65th Canadian Geotechnical Conference.
Ghazi, S 2011, ‘Modeling of an underground mine backfill barricade’, Masters thesis, University of Toronto.
Grice, AG 1998, ‘Stability of hydraulic backfill barricades’, in ML Bloss (ed.), Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Mining with Backfill, Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Carlton, pp. 117-20.
Grice, AG 2001, ‘Recent mine developments in Australia’, in D Stone (ed.), Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Mining with Backfill, Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration, Littleton, Colorado, pp. 351-7.
Helinski, M, Wines, D, Revell, M & Sainsbury, D 2011, ‘Critical factors influencing the capacity of arched fibrecrete bulkheads and waste rock barricades’, in HJ Ilgner (ed.), Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Mining with Backfill, The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Johannesburg, pp. 293-304.
Helinski, M & Grice, AG 2007, ‘Water management in hydraulic fill operations’, in FP Hassani & JF Archibald (eds), Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Mining with Backfill, Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, Westmount, on CD-ROM.
Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. 2005 ‘FLAC3D: Fast Analysis of Continua in 3 Dimensions, Version 3.0. Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., Minneapolis.
Kuganathan, K 2001, ‘Mine backfilling, backfill drainage and bulkhead construction – a safety first approach’, Australia’s Mining Monthly, February 2001, pp. 58-64.
Kuganathan, K 2002, ‘A method to design efficient mine backfill drainage systems to improve safety and stability of backfill bulkheads and fills’, Proceedings of the 8th AusIMM Underground Operators’ Conference, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Carlton, pp. 181-8.
Revell, MB & Sainsbury, DP 2007a, ‘Paste bulkhead failures’, in FP Hassani & JF Archibald (eds), Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Mining with Backfill, Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, Westmount, on CD-ROM.
Revell, MB & Sainsbury, DP 2007b, ‘Advancing paste fill bulkhead design using numerical modeling’, in FP Hassani & JF Archibald (eds), Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Mining with Backfill, Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, Westmount, on CD-ROM.
Sivakugan, N, Rankine, K & Rankine, R 2006a, ‘Permeability of hydraulic fills and barricade bricks’, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 661-73.
Sivakugan, N, Rankine, RM, Rankine, KJ & Rankine, RS 2006b, ‘Geotechnical considerations in mine backfilling in Australia’, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 14, no. 12-13, pp. 1168-75.
Soderberg, RL & Busch, RA 1985, Report of Investigations 8959, Bulkheads and drains for high sandfill stopes, United States Bureau of Mines, Spokane.
Su, Y, Tian, Y & Song, X 2009, ‘Progressive collapse analysis of axially restrained beams’, American Concrete Institute Structural Journal, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 600-7.
Thompson, BD, Grabinsky, MW & Bawden, WF 2011, ‘In situ monitoring of cemented paste backfill pressure to increase backfilling efficiency’, Canadian Institute of Mining Journal, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 199-209.
Thompson, BD, Bawden, WF & Grabinsky, MW 2012, ‘In-situ measurements of cemented paste backfill at the Cayeli Mine’, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 755-72, viewed 3 April 2014,
Vecchio, FJ & Collins, MP 1986, ‘The modified compression field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear’, Journal of the American Concrete Institute, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 219-31.
VecTor Analysis Group 2014, ‘VecTor4’, VecTor Analysis Group, Toronto, .
Veenstra, RL 2013, ‘A design procedure for determining the in situ stresses of early age cemented paste backfill’, PhD Thesis, University of Toronto, viewed 3 April 2014,
Yumlu, M & Guresci, M 2007, ‘Paste backfill bulkhead monitoring – a case study from Inmet’s Cayeli Mine, Turkey’, in FP Hassani & JF Archibald (eds), Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Mining with Backfill, Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, Westmount, on CD-ROM.




© Copyright 2021, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au