Kaiser, PK 2014, 'Deformation-based support selection for tunnels in strainburst-prone ground', in M Hudyma & Y Potvin (eds), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining
, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 227-240, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1410_13_Kaiser
Since the 1980s, many contributed to major advances in the state-of-the-art of ground control in
burst-prone ground and innovative support selection procedures as well as a sophisticated tool box full of effective rock retention and support components and systems.
Most of these advances and the design of support in burst-prone ground, however, are based on the fundamental assumptions that seismic events create ground motions that damage excavations, and thus load and potentially damage the ground support. It is therefore often implied that the source of energy that causes damage stems from mining-induced seismic events. Kaiser and Cai (2013a, b) critically reviewed the support design guiding principles and identified three deficiencies with serious practical implications:
As a consequence, support needs to cope with large localised deformations and thus all support components in a support system must satisfy a deformation-based design criterion.
This paper builds on the above-mentioned articles and presents a deformation-based design concept for the control of damage caused by seismically triggered strainbursts. First, the impact of bulking deformations sustained during the failure of brittle rock masses is illustrated on the well-known ground–reaction-curve concept whereby geometric bulking deformations caused by mining-induced stress changes can be integrated. Second, it is demonstrated that the deformation demand on support is dominated by brittle failure processes in the inner shell (defined by the minor principal stress contour (at 3≤UCS/10)). Field observations from extensometers support these findings. This is consistent with findings from discrete element modelling results presented by Garza-Cruz et al. (2014).
Next, the concept of excavation deformation potential (EDP) is introduced to assess the influence of mine stiffness on the vulnerability of an excavation to strainbursting. It is suggested that the EDP is a key parameter for the identification of potential strainburst locations. This hypothesis is then tested qualitatively on extensive strainbursting encountered during the excavation of five tunnels at the Jinping II project (China). It is concluded that potential strainburst locations correspond to locations with elevated deformation potential. From a support design perspective, it is concluded that strainburst damage can be most effectively be controlled by a support system consisting of a robust retention elements in combination with stiff rock mass reinforcements, minimising bulking, and with yielding bolts, satisfying a deformation rather than an energy demand criterion.
Bewick, RP, Kaiser, PK & Valley, B 2011, ‘Interpretation of triaxial testing data for estimation of the Hoek–Brown strength parameter mi’, in GS Esterhuizen, AN Tutuncu & AT Iannacchione (eds), Proceedings of the 45th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, American Rock Mechanics Association, Alexandria.
Corkum, A, Lorig, L, DeGagné, D & Jakubec, J 2011, Guidelines for Mine Tunnel Support Design Revision 1, report to Mine Tunnel Support project sponsors, Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., SRK Consulting Ltd. and BGC Engineering Inc.; based on: Hoek, E 2007, Practical Rock Engineering,
, and Diederichs, MS 2007, 2003 ‘Mechanistic Interpretation and Practical Application of Damage and Spalling Prediction Criteria for Deep Tunneling’, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 44, pp. 1087-1116.
Diederichs, MS, Carter, T & Martin, D 2010, ‘Practical rock spall prediction in tunnels’, Proceedings of the 2010 World Tunnelling Congress, Tunnelling Association of Canada, Richmond, paper no. 517.
Garza-Cruz, TV, Pierce, M & Kaiser, PK 2014, ‘Use of 3DEC to study spalling and deformation associated with tunnelling at depth’, in M Hudyma & Y Potvin (eds), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 421-434.
Heal, D, Potvin, Y & Hudyma, M 2006, ‘Evaluating rockburst damage potential in underground mining’, in DP Yale, SC Holtz, C Breeds & U Ozbay (eds), Proceedings of the 41st US Symposium on Rock Mechanics, American Rock Mechanics Association, Alexandria.
Kaiser, PK & Cai, M 2013a, ‘Critical review of design principles for rock support in burst-prone ground – time to rethink!’, in Y Potvin & B Brady (eds), Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Underground Construction, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 3-38.
Kaiser, PK & Cai, M 2013b, ‘Rockburst damage mechanisms and support design principles’, in A Malovichko & D Malovichko (eds), Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines: RaSiM8, Geophysical Survey of Russian Academy of Sciences, Obninsk, Mining Institute of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Perm, pp. 349-370.
Kaiser, PK, Diederichs, MS, Martin, CD, Sharp, J & Steiner, W, 2000‚ ‘Underground works in hard rock tunneling and mining’, Proceedings of the Proceedings of the International Conference on Geotechnical and Geological Engineering: GeoEng2000, vol. 1, Technomic Publishing Co. Inc., Lancaster, pp. 841-926.
Kaiser, PK, McCreath, DR & Tannant, DD 1996, Rockburst Support Handbook, vol. 2, original version in Canadian Rockburst Research Program 1990-95, Canadian Mining Industry Research Organization, Sudbury.
Kaiser, PK 2006, ‘Rock mechanics consideration for construction of deep tunnel in brittle ground’, Proceedings of the 4th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, on CD-ROM.
Laubscher, DH 1990, ‘A geomechanics classification system for the rating of rock mass in mine design’, Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 90, no. 10, pp. 257-273.
Martin, CD, Kaiser, PK & McCreath, DR 1999, ‘Hoek–Brown parameters for predicting the depth of brittle failure around tunnels’, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 136-151.
Salamon, MDG 1993, Some applications of geomechanical modelling in rockburst and related research, Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines, in RP Young (ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 297-309.
Thöny, R 2014, ‘Geomechanical analyses of excavation-induced rock mass behaviour of faulted Opalinus Clay at the Mont Terri Underground Research Laboratory (Switzerland)’, PhD thesis, no. 21415, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Turichshev, A, Hadjigeorgiou, J, Brzovic, A, Reyes-Montes, J & Nasseri, MHB 2011, ‘Behaviour of veined rock under triaxial compression’, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining: MassMin2012, Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, Westmount, on CD-ROM.
Yong, S, PK, Kaiser & S, Löw 2010, ‘Influence of tectonic shears on excavation-induced fracturing’, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 894-907.