Authors: Yao, M; Sampson-Forsythe, A; Punkkinen, AR


Cite As:
Yao, M, Sampson-Forsythe, A & Punkkinen, AR 2014, 'Examples of ground support practice in challenging ground conditions at Vale’s deep operations in Sudbury', in M Hudyma & Y Potvin (eds), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 291-304.

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Vale has operated a number of underground mines in the Ontario division in Sudbury for over a century. During this time, numerous mining methods have been employed including cut-and-fill, drift-and-fill, post pillar cut-and-fill, modified sublevel caving, underhand cut-and-fill/drift and fill plus bulk mining methods such as vertical retreat mining (VRM)/slot-slash, uppers retreat and underhand bulk mining. The division hosts a wide variety of orebodies of varying geometries, many of these at advanced stages of mining extraction. Consequently, the geomechanical challenges are substantial and include both gravity-driven and rockburst-prone ground failure conditions that are further exacerbated by rock mass characteristics and ever-increasing mining depths. Typically the gravity-driven scenarios include the recovery of remnant pillars in old mined out areas, mining through consolidated backfill and recovery of post-failure sill pillars. Burst-prone conditions become a challenge when mining through stiff and brittle geological structures, upon recovery of highly stressed sill pillars in narrow vein ore bodies or when mining at depths in excess of 2,500 m from surface. Gravity driven and stress induced ground failures may occur simultaneously. Underhand cut-and-fill for sill pillar recovery in narrow vein ore bodies are also known to involve risk from both of these failure mechanisms. The adaptation of ground support practices has accelerated over the last two decades leading to an overall improvement in both safety and production. Several cases are presented in this paper illustrating the successful implementation of ground support practices at two of Vale’s six deep mining operations in Sudbury. A particular focus of this paper will be on 153 Orebody of Coleman Mine, where highly stressed multi-sill pillars are being mined by utilising both overhand and underhand cut-and-fill mining method, and 400 and 461 orebodies of Creighton Deep, where mining takes place below 2,400 m from surface. The design and motivation behind the rationale for ground support design are investigated. The equipment, best mining practice and procedures are discussed, as well as products associated with each design.

Keywords:

References:
Australian Centre for Geomechanics 2014, mXrap, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, http://www.mxrap.com
Itasca Consulting Canada, Inc. 2009, 153 Orebody Mining and Geotechnical study for 4550 and 4700 levels crown pillar recovery, unpublished report submitted to Vale, Itasca Consulting Canada, Inc., Sudbury.
Kaiser, PK, McCreath, DR & Tannant, DD 1996, Canadian Rockburst Support Handbook, Mining Innovation Rehabilitation and Applied Research Corporation, Sudbury.
Li, CC & Doucet, C 2009, ‘Performance of D-Bolts Under Dynamic Loading’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 194-204.
Maybee, G 2001, Static and Dynamic Testing of Weld Wire Mesh, report submitted to Robert Gustas, INCO Ltd., Geomechanics Research Centre / Mirarco
Punkkinen, A & Yao, M 2012, ‘Change of ground support system and mining practice in the Deep at Creighton Mine’, Proceedings of the CIM Mining Conference & Exhibition 2007, Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, Westmount.
Pakalnis & Associates Consulting 2011, Report on Sill Mat Design for the 153 OB/MOB at Coleman, unpublished report submitted to Vale, Pakalnis & Associates Consulting.
Smith, S & Palmer, P 2014, Review: Support Requirements for Mining Under a Gabion Sill Mat at Vale Coleman 153 OB, unpublished report submitted to Vale, Golder Associates.
SRK Consulting 2012, Coleman Mine 153 Orebody 4810 to 5080 Level Geomechanical Study, unpublished report submitted to Vale.
Stone, DMR 1993, ‘The optimization of mix designs for cemented rockfill’, in HW Glen (ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Mining with Backfill, South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Johannesburg, pp. 249-53.
Yao, M, Chinnasane, DR & Harding, D 2009 ‘Mitigation Plans for Mining in Highly Burst-Prone Ground Conditions at Vale Inco Copper Cliff North Mine’, in M Diederichs & G Grasselli (eds), Proceedings of the 3rd Canada-US Rock Mechanics Symposium & 20th Canadian Rock Mechanics Symposium, 2009 CIM Annual Conference; Rock Engineering in Difficult Conditions: ROCKENG09, Canadian Rock Mechanics Association, paper 4045.




© Copyright 2019, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries to or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au