Authors: Mudau, A; Stacey, TR; Govender, RA
Show More
Download Paper
Open access courtesy of:

Citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero

Recently, a support method termed ‘sacrificial support’ was proposed as a potential additional method to prevent rockburst damage, based on observations made after rockburst events in a mine. The philosophy behind a sacrificial support system is that: under dynamic loading conditions support, in the form of a liner, must fail leaving behind, undamaged, what was once supported rock mass. In this paper, spalling tests based on Split Hopkinson pressure bar technique were conducted to study some aspects of dynamic rock fracturing in tension at high strain rates and the role a sacrificial layer plays in combating dynamic rock failure. To achieve this, a single Hopkinson pressure bar, with a long cylindrical intact rock specimen attached at the bar free end, was impacted by a striker on the opposite free end of the bar in order to generate a dynamic stress pulse responsible for spall failure upon reflection from the specimen free end. Different liners and/or liner combinations were then introduced at the specimen free end as support. Such a simple, yet robust experimental set-up, allowed the potential benefits and failure mechanisms associated with sacrificial support under dynamic loading to be demonstrated. Analysis of experimental results revealed that varying liner thickness and mechanical impedance between rock and support liner plays a significant role to help limit rockburst damage. Keywords: rockburst, sacrificial support, Split Hopkinson pressure bar

Keywords: rockburst, sacrificial support, Split Hopkinson pressure bar

Mudau, A, Stacey, TR & Govender, RA 2017, 'Experimental investigations into sacrificial support for containment of rockburst damage', in J Wesseloo (ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 435-446.

Gamma, BA, Lopatnikov, SL & Gillepsie, JW 2004, ‘Hopkinson bar experimental technique: a critical review’, Applied Mechanics Reviews, vol. 57, pp. 223–250.
Govender, RA, Louca, LA, Pullen, A, Fallah, AS & Nurick, GN 2011, ‘Determining the thorough-thickness properties of thick glass fiber reinforced polymers at high strain rates’, Journal of Composite Materials, vol. 46, pp. 1219–1228.
Ortlepp, WD & Stacey, TR 1997, ‘Testing of tunnel support: dynamic load testing of rock support containment systems’, Safety in Mines Research Advisory Committee, SIMRAC GAP Project 221.
Player, JR, Thompson, AG & Villaescusa, E 2008, ‘Dynamic testing of reinforcement systems’, in TR Stacey & DF Malan (eds), Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Civil Engineering Construction, South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Symposium Series S51, Cape Town, pp. 581–595.
Stacey, TR & Rojas, E 2013, ‘A potential method of containing rockburst damage and enhancing safety using a sacrificial layer’, Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 113, pp. 565–573.
Stacey, TR 2012, ‘A philosophical view on the testing of rock support for rockburst conditions’, Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 113, pp. 227–245.
Stacey, TR 1991, Method of and means for inhibiting rockbursts, Patent Application, Provisional Specification, registered through Adams and Adams, Patent Attorneys, Pretoria.
Tedesco, JW & Landis, DW 1989, ‘Wave propagation through layered systems’, Computers and Structures, vol. 48, pp. 625–638.
Zhou, YX, Xia, K, Li, XB, Li, HB, Ma, GW, Zhao, J, Zhou, F & Dai, F 2012, ‘Suggested methods for determining the dynamic strength parameters and mode-I fracture toughness of rock materials’, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, vol. 49, pp. 105–112.

© Copyright 2017, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries to or error reports to