Authors: Charette, F; Bennett, A
Editors: Wesseloo, J
Conference: Eighth International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, 28-30 March, Perth
Published: Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, pp.709-722, Perth
Ground support schemes consist of surface support systems that contact the excavation boundary and a reinforcement system embedded into the rock mass. Under static conditions, these systems can work relatively independently, as the requirement for them to work together is minimal, as demonstrated by practices such as shotcreting over reinforcement bolts, preventing significant interaction.
However, the compatibility of these components with each other determines the overall effectiveness and capacity of the overall ground support scheme under quasi-static and dynamic conditions. Under loading from a seismic event, the support scheme installed to prevent a rockfall, is only as good as the weakest link. As the load transfer from the rock mass to the surface support occurs, engaging the reinforcement, it is critical that the connections are given special attention to prevent premature failure of the scheme.
Traditionally, the connection, or the plate, is designed to be stronger than the reinforcement element as a plate failure usually renders the entire support scheme inoperable. There is, however, a difference between yielding and failing, and this is crucial in dynamic conditions. The individual elements each have unique characteristics in terms of load/displacement but when combined in a scheme they react differently.
A well designed connection bearing or face plate between the surface support and the reinforcement acts as a system load indicator allowing for exclusion or rehabilitation to occur prior to a complete support system failure and resultant fall of ground. During dynamic testing, it has been shown that plates designed to deform in the yielding zone of a rockbolt can increase the total deformation and energy capacity of the bolt by 3–5 kJ compared to other plates.
A plate should begin to deform in the yielding zone of the bolt and ultimately fail after the reinforcement element fails. This plate failure is a controlled release of energy (dissipation) as opposed to a reinforcement failure creating a projectile nut (thread) or a fall of ground.
Keywords: bearing plate dynamic ground support design
Keywords: bearing plate dynamic ground support design
Charette, F & Bennett, A 2017, 'The importance of the face plate as part of an engineered holistic ground support scheme in dynamic conditions', in J Wesseloo (ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining
, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 709-722.
ASTM F432-13 2013, Standard Specification for Roof and Rock Bolts and Accessories, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania.
Barrett, D & Player, JR 2002, ‘Big bell, high stress at shallow depth’, International Seminar on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre of Geomechanics, Perth.
Charette, F, Hyett, AJ, Voyzelle, B & Anderson, T 2014, ‘Load-deformation behaviour of a deformable rockbolt and accessories under dynamic loading’, in M Hudyma & Y Potvin (eds), Proceedings of the Seventh International Seminar on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 253–262.
Drover, C & Villaescusa, E 2015, ‘Performance of shotcrete surface support following dynamic loading of mining excavations’, in M Lu, O Sigl & GJ Li (eds), Shotcrete for Underground Support XII, ECI Symposium Series, Singapore.
Gray, P 1998, ‘Bearing plates: new developments in the unsung heroes of ground support’, Proceedings of Coal 1998: Coal Operators’ Conference, University of Wollongong & the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, pp. 167–178.
Hadjigeorgiou, J & Potvin, Y 2011, ‘A critical assessment of dynamic rock reinforcement and support testing facilities’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 565–578.
Heal, D, Potvin, Y & Hudyma, M 2006 ‘Evaluating rockburst damage potential in underground mining’, in C Breads, SC Holtx, MU Ozbay & DP Yale (eds), Proceedings American Rock Mechanics Association 41st US Rock Mechanics Symposium (USRMS): ‘50 Years of Rock Mechanics – Landmarks and Future Challenges’, Golden, Colorado.
Kaiser, PK, McCreath, DR & Tannant, DD 1996, Canadian Rock Burst Support Handbook, Canadian Rockburst Research Program 1990–1995, Canadian Mining Industry Research Organization, Sudbury.
Li, T, Singh, U & Coxon, JA 2002, ‘Case study of management of high stress and seismicity at Junction Mine’, International Seminar on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre of Geomechanics, Perth.
Li, T 2001, ‘Use of DE plates as replacement for Dragonfly plates’, WMC Memorandum, vol. June.
Louchnikov, V, Sandy, MP, Watson, O, Orunesu, M & Eremenko, V 2014, ‘An overview of surface rock support for deformable ground conditions’, Proceedings of the 12th AusIMM Underground Operators’ Conference 2014, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Carlton South, pp. 57–66.
Moss, KJ 1971, ‘Rock bolts in current use in Australia’, Symposium on Rock Bolting, The Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Carlton South.
Potvin, Y, Wesseloo, J & Heal, D 2010, ‘An interpretation of ground support capacity submitted to dynamic loading’, in M Van Sint Jan & Y Potvin, Proceedings of the Fifth International Seminar on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 251–272. Also in Potvin, Y, Wesseloo, J & Heal, D 2010, ‘An interpretation of ground support capacity submitted to dynamic loading’, Mining Technology, vol. 119, no. 4, pp. 233–245.
Stacey, TR 2012, ‘A philosophical view on the testing of rock support for rockburst conditions’, Southern Hemisphere International Rock Mechanics Symposium (SHIRMS) 2012, Sun City, South Africa.
Thomas, S 2015, ‘Resin bolt projectile failures’, Eastern Australian Ground Control Group - Stress and Seismicity Workshop, Launceston.
Thompson, AG & Villaescusa, E 2014, ‘Case studies of rock reinforcement components and systems testing’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1589–1602.
Thompson, AG, Villaescusa, E & Windsor, CR 2012, ‘Ground support terminology and classification: an update’, Geotechnical & Geological Engineering, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 553–580.
Van Sint Jan, M & Palape, M 2007, ‘Behaviour of steel plates during rockbursts’, in Y Potvin (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Seminar on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 405–412.
Villaescusa, E, Thompson, AG & Player, JR 2015, Dynamic Testing of Ground Support Systems: Report 312 Project M417, Minerals Research Institute of Western Australia, Perth.
Yi, X & Kaiser, PK 1994, ‘Impact testing for rockbolt design in rockburst conditions’, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science and Geomechanical Abstracts, vol. 31, no. 6. pp. 67–68.