Optimisation of the undercut level elevation in block caving mines using a mathematical programming framework
|
Authors: Noriega, R; Pourrahimian, Y; Victor, WL Open access courtesy of:
|
DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1815_25_Noriega
Cite As:
Noriega, R, Pourrahimian, Y & Victor, WL 2018, 'Optimisation of the undercut level elevation in block caving mines using a mathematical programming framework', in Y Potvin & J Jakubec (eds), Caving 2018: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 363-372, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1815_25_Noriega
Abstract:
The selection of an elevation for the placement of the undercut level is a decisive initial step in the planning and design of block caving mines. It is key for the success of a caving project to define the undercut elevation that will most likely yield the highest possible net present value (NPV) of the operation, considering the discounting periods from both the vertical draw rate extraction of the ore and the horizontal mining direction advancement. This paper outlines a mathematical programming framework to determine the best undercut elevation by formulating a simplified linear integer programming (IP) model that captures the discounting of the profits from the vertical draw rate extraction and the horizontal advance direction that can be applied at the early stages of a caving project. The IP model comprises a simplified block caving scheduling algorithm that considers ‘mining units’ (MU), which are groupings of blocks within each column based on the minimum draw rate condition and the undercut elevation considered. The formulation considers the following constraints: mining capacity, minimum and maximum draw rate, vertical precedence within columns and a horizontal precedence based on a concave mining advancement front. The model is set on an iterative loop over the different possible levels. The model is tested on a case study, where it provides a tool to evaluate the potential mineable reserves, define the optimal undercut elevation, and a starting schedule for future detailed engineering design.
Keywords: block caving, undercut elevation, optimisation, integer programming
References:
Bartlett, P 1992, ‘The design and operation of a mechanized cave at Premier Diamond Mine’, in HW Glen (ed.), Proceedings of MassMin 1992, The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Johannesburg.
Brown, ET 2002, Block Caving Geomechanics, Julius Kruttschnitt Mineral Research Centre, Indooroopilly, and The University of Queensland, Brisbane.
Chanda, E 1990, ‘An application of integer programming and simulation to production planning for a stratiform ore body’, Mining Science and Technology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 165–172.
Dassault Systèmes 2018, GEMS PCBC, computer software, Dassault Systèmes, Paris, https://www.3ds.com/products-services/geovia/products/gems
Diering, T 2000, ‘PC-BC: a block cave design and draw control system’, in G Chitombo (ed.), Proceedings of MassMin 2000, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne.
Diering, T, Richter, O & Villa, D 2008, ‘Block cave production scheduling using PCBC’, in H Schunnesson & E Nordlund (eds), Proceedings of MassMin 2008, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå.
Elkington, TB, Richter, L & Richter, O 2012, ‘Block caving outline optimisation’, Proceedings of MassMin 2012, Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, Westmount.
IBM 2015, IBM ILOG CPLEX Optimization Studio, computer software, IBM, Armonk, https://www.ibm.com/au-en/marketplace/ibm-ilog-cplex
Khodayari, F & Pourrahimian, Y 2015, ‘Mathematical programming applications in block-caving scheduling: a review of models and algorithms’, International Journal of Mining and Mineral Engineering, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 234–257.
Laubscher, D 1994, ‘Cave mining: state of the art’, Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 94, no. 10, pp. 279–293.
Pourrahimian, Y & Askari-Nasab, H 2014, ‘An application of mathematical programming to determine the best height of draw in blockcave sequence optimisation’, Mining Technology, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 162–172.
Pourrahimian, Y, Askari-Nasab, H & Tannant, D 2012, ‘Block caving production scheduling optimization using mathematical programming’, Proceedings MassMin 2012, Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, Westmount.
Pourrahimian, Y, Askari-Nasab, H & Tannant, D 2013, ‘A multi-step approach for block-cave production scheduling optimisation’, International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 739–750.
Rahal, D, Dudley, J & Hout, G 2008, ‘Developing an optimised production forecast at Northparkes E48 mine using MILP, in H Schunnesson & E Nordlund (eds), Proceedings of MassMin 2008, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå.
Rubio, E 2002, ‘Long term planning of block caving operations using mathematical programming tools’, MSc thesis, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
The MathWorks 2018, MATLAB, version R2018a, computer software, The MathWorks, Natick, https://au.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html
Tukker, H, Holder, A, Swarts, B, van Strijp, T & Grobler, E 2016, ‘The CCUT block cave design for Cullinan Diamond Mine’, Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 116, no. 8,
Vargas, E, Morales, N & X, Emery 2014, ‘Footprint and economic envelope calculation for block/panel caving mines under geological uncertainty’, in R Castro (ed), Proceedings of the Third International on Block and Sublevel Caving, University of Chile, Santiago, pp. 449–456.
© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au