The action is where the social is! The ecosystem services concept and other ideas for enhancing stakeholder engagement in integrated mine closure planning
|
Authors: Morrison-Saunders, A Open access courtesy of:
|
DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1915_02_Morrison-Saunders
Cite As:
Morrison-Saunders, A 2019, 'The action is where the social is! The ecosystem services concept and other ideas for enhancing stakeholder engagement in integrated mine closure planning', in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2019: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 5-18, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1915_02_Morrison-Saunders
Abstract:
Effective stakeholder engagement is integral to effective integrated mine closure planning. All aspects of mine closure planning from the geotechnical to environmental, social and economic, need to be communicated to, and developed in conjunction with input from, the public and other stakeholders. This is why the action is where the social is! Using the latest International Council of Mining and Metals (ICMM) good practice guide for integrated mine closure as its basis, this paper addresses four topics: (1) the role of stakeholder engagement in mine closure planning; (2) best practice principles for stakeholder engagement derived mainly from environmental impact assessment processes; (3) using an ecosystem services approach to stakeholder engagement; and (4) stakeholder engagement in a digital world. Review of recent literature, recent research utilising ecosystem services assessment in planning for mine site rehabilitation and closure in Brazil and Australia, along with procedural examples from Western Australia, are used to explore the theory and practice of effective stakeholder engagement. The ICMM guide establishes a role for mining companies in stakeholder engagement that extends beyond minimum legal compliance for consultation to enable deliberation, partnership, and a shared vision and responsibilities in mine closure planning and post-mining relinquishment. Where many components of mine closure planning are developed separately, including rehabilitation and closure criteria (which are often expressed using biophysical indicators), the integrated nature of ecosystem services thinking has been helpful when engaging with communities utilising pre- and post-mined areas to translate these into socially meaningful understanding of mine closure planning and its implementation. Mining company representatives involved in workshops conducted in Brazil and Australia indicated that the ecosystem services concept could be helpful in relation to mine closure planning, especially in relation to community engagement. Accelerating technological innovation and the use of digital media shows signs of promise for enhancing stakeholder engagement (for communities with good access to social media and the internet), although practice to date has emphasised consultation and basic communication with stakeholders rather than extending to full interaction and deliberation at the other end of the spectrum of public participation. Being a keynote address for the Mine Closure 2019 Conference, this paper is intended to have some relevance to all mine closure practitioners and to stimulate thinking and debate regarding ideas for enhancing stakeholder engagement in mine closure planning.
Keywords: stakeholder engagement, public participation, mine closure planning, ecosystem services assessment
References:
Aaen, SB, Lyhne, I & Nielsen, H 2018, ‘The use of social media in impact assessment: experiences among national infrastructure developers in Denmark’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 456–466.
Althaus, C, Bridgman, P & Davis, G 2018, The Australian Policy Handbook: A practical guide to the policy-making process, 6th edition, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.
André, P, Enserink, B, Connor, D & Croal, P 2006, Public Participation International Best Practice Principles, Special Publication Series No. 4, International Association for Impact Assessment, Fargo, viewed 17 December 2018,
Arnstein, SR 1969, ‘A ladder of citizen participation’, Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 216–224.
Asian Development Bank 2012, Handbook on Poverty and Social Analysis A Working Document, viewed 25 May 2019,
Bates, G (ed.) 1997, Butterworths Environmental Management and Law Dictionary, Butterworths Australia, Sydney, p. 137.
Bina, O, Jing, W, Brown, L & Partidário, MR 2011, ‘An inquiry into the concept of SEA effectiveness: Towards criteria for Chinese practice’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 31, pp. 572–581.
Bond, A & Morrison-Saunders, A 2018, ‘Environmental Impact Assessment and the quest for sustainable mining’, in S Lodhia (ed.), Mining and Sustainable Development: Current Issues, Routledge Studies of the Extractive Industries and Sustainable Development, Routledge, London, pp. 47–64.
Department of Mines and Petroleum and Environmental Protection Authority 2015, Guidelines for preparing mine closure plans, Revision of the Guidelines for Preparing Mine Closure Plans, June 2011, viewed 12 April 2017,
Environment and Communications Reference Committee 2019, Rehabilitation of mining and resources projects and power station ash dams as it relates to Commonwealth responsibilities, Senate Printing Unit, Canberra, viewed 21 March 2019,
Environmental Protection Authority 2018, Environmental Impact Assessment (Part IV Divisions 1 And 2) Procedures Manual, Western Australia, viewed 27 March 2019, Procedures Manual 300418.pdf
Esteves, AM, Franks, D & Vanclay, F 2012, ‘Social impact assessment: the state of the art’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 34–42.
Fourie, A & Brent, AC 2005, ‘A project-based Mine Closure Model (MCM) for sustainable asset Life Cycle Management’, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 14, no. 12–13, pp. 1085–1095.
Fundingsland Tetlow, M & Hanusch, M 2012, ‘Strategic environmental assessment: the state of the art’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 30, no.1, pp. 15–24.
Geneletti, D 2011, ‘Reasons and options for integrating ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment of spatial planning’, International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 143–149.
Geneletti, D 2016, Handbook on Biodiversity and ecosystem services in impact assessment, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
Glasson, J, Therivel, R & Chadwick, A 2019, Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment, 5th Edition, Routledge, Oxon.
Government of Western Australia 2016, ‘Environmental Impact Assessment (Part IV Divisions 1 And 2) Administrative Procedures 2016’, Environmental Protection Act 2016, Western Australian Government Gazette No. 223, pp. 5601–5616, viewed 27 March 2019,
Grant, CD, Ward, SC & Morley, SC 2007, ‘Return of ecosystem function to restored bauxite mines in Western Australia’, Ecology Restoration, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. S94–S103.
Hanna, P & Vanclay, F 2013, ‘Human rights, Indigenous peoples and the concept of Free, Prior and Informed Consent’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 146–157.
Hansen, K, Malmaeus, M, Hasselström, L, Lindblom, E, Norén, K, Olshammar, M, … & Soutukorva, A 2018, ‘Integrating ecosystem services in Swedish environmental assessments: an empirical analysis’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 253–264.
Harris-Roxas, B, Viliani, F, Bond, A, Cave, B, Divall, M, Furu, P, … & Winkler, M 2012, ‘Health impact assessment: the state of the art’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 43–52.
Hartz-Karp, J, Pope, J & Petrova, P 2015 'A Deliberative Collaborative Governance Approach to Sustainability Assessment’, in A Morrison-Saunders, J Pope & A Bond (eds), Handbook of Sustainability Assessment, Research Handbooks on Impact Assessment, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 375–402.
International Association for Impact Assessment & Institute for Environmental Assessment UK 1999, Principles of Environmental Impact Assessment Best Practice, viewed 17 Feb 2018,
International Association for Public Participation 2007, Foundations of Public Participation, viewed 11 July 2017,
International Association for Public Participation 2014, IAP2's Spectrum of Public Participation, viewed 17 Feb 2019,
International Council on Mining & Metals 2019, Integrated Mine Closure Good Practice Guide, 2nd edn, viewed 27 March 2019,
Inter-American Development Bank 2017, Meaningful Stakeholder Consultation, IDB Series on Environmental and Social Risk and Responsibility, viewed 30 March 2019,
Kemp, D & Vanclay, F 2013, ‘Human rights and impact assessment: clarifying the connections in practice’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 86–96.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis, Island Press, Washington, DC, viewed 23 May 2019,
Morgan, RK 1998, Environmental Impact Assessment: A Methodological Perspective, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
Morrison-Saunders, A 2018, Advanced Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
Morrison-Saunders, A, McHenry, MP, Rita Sequeira, A, Gorey, P, Mtegha, H & Doepel, D 2016, ‘Integrating mine closure planning with environmental impact assessment: Challenges and opportunities drawn from African and Australian practice’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 117–128.
Morrison-Saunders, A & Pope, J 2013, ‘Conceptualising and managing trade-offs in sustainability assessment’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 38, pp. 54–63.
Niyaz, A & Storey, D 2011, ‘Environmental management in the absence of participation: a case study of the Maldives’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 69–77.
Noble, B 2015, Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment: A Guide to Principles and Practice, 3rd edn, Don Mills, Oxford University Press, Ontario.
O’Riordan, T & Sewell, WRD 1981, ‘From project appraisal to policy review’, in T O’Riordan & WRD Sewell (eds), Project Appraisal and Policy Review, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 1–28.
Petts, J 1999, ‘Public participation and environmental impact assessment’, in J Petts (ed.), Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment Volume 1: Environmental Impact Assessment: Process, Methods and Potential, Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 145–177.
Retief, F, Bond, A, Pope, J, Morrison-Saunders, A & King, N 2016, ‘Global megatrends and their implications for environmental assessment practice’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 61, pp. 52–60.
Rosa, JCS, Morrison-Saunders, A, Sánchez, LE, Hughes, M & Geneletti, D 2019, ‘Applying ecosystem services assessment in closure planning to enhance post-mining land use outcomes: learning from bauxite mining in Brazil and Australia’, in AB Fourie &
M Tibbett (eds), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 937–950.
Rosa, JCS & Sánchez, LE 2015, ‘Is the ecosystem service concept improving impact assessment? Evidence from recent international practice’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 50, pp. 134–142.
Rosa, JCS & Sánchez, LE 2016, ‘Advances and challenges of incorporating ecosystem services into impact assessment’, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 180, pp. 485–492.
Rosa, J, Morrison-Saunders, A & Sánchez, L 2018a, ‘Improving Stakeholder Engagement in Closure Planning through an Ecosystem Services Approach’, Proceedings for Planning for Closure 2018, Gecamin, Santiago,
Rosa, J, Sánchez, L & Morrison-Saunders, A 2018b, ‘Getting to "agreed" post-mining land use - An ecosystem approach’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 220–229.
Sánchez, LE, Silva-Sánchez, SS & Neri, AC 2014, Guide for Mine Closure Planning, Instituto Brasileiro de Mineração, Brazil, viewed 30 March 2019,
Sheedy, A 2008, Handbook on Citizen Engagement: Beyond Consultation, Canadian Policy Research Networks, viewed 17 Feb 2018,
Sinclair, AJ, Doelle, M & Gibson, RB 2018, ‘Implementing next generation assessment: A case example of a global challenge’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 72, pp. 166–176.
Sinclair, AJ, Peirson-Smith, T & Boerchers, M 2017, ‘Environmental assessments in the Internet age: the role of e-governance and social media in creating platforms for meaningful participation’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 148–157.
Slootweg, R 2015, ‘Ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment: are we missing the point of a simple concept?’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 79–86.
Stedman, A & Green, KP 2018, Fraser Institute Annual Survey of Mining Companies 2018, Fraser Institute, viewed 27 March 2019,
Sutton, A, Weston, D & Morrison-Saunders, A 2019, Being agile: evolving IA in a changing world, 39th Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment, Brisbane.
United Nations 2015, Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, A/RES/70/1, viewed 17 October 2017, Agenda for Sustainable Development web.pdf
United Nations Development Program 2013, Integrating HIV and Gender-Related Issues into Environmental Assessment in Eastern and Southern Africa, viewed 24 May 2019,
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe 1998, Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, viewed 21 February 2019,
United Nations Environment Program 2018, Assessing Environmental Impacts - A Global Review of Legislation, Nairobi, viewed 9 Feb 2019,
United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner 2013, Free, Prior and Informed Consent of Indigenous Peoples, Geneva, viewed 25 May 2019,
Vanclay, F 2003, ‘International principles for social impact assessment’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 21, no. 1,
pp. 5–12.
Wawrzyczek, J, Lindsay, R, Metzger, MJ & Quétier, F 2018, ‘The ecosystem approach in ecological impact assessment: Lessons learned from windfarm developments on peatlands in Scotland’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 72, pp. 157–165.
World Bank 2017, The World Bank Environmental and Social Framework, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, viewed 30 March 2019,
Yang, T 2018, ‘The Emergence of the Environmental Impact Assessment Duty as a Global Legal Norm and General Principle of Law’, Hastings Law Journal, viewed 30 March 2019,
Zuhair, MH & Kurian, PA 2016, ‘Socioeconomic and political barriers to public participation in EIA: implications for sustainable development in the Maldives’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 129–142.
© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au