Social aspects of mine closure: the elephant in the room

Authors: Edwards, J; Maritz, A

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1915_25_Edwards

Cite As:
Edwards, J & Maritz, A 2019, 'Social aspects of mine closure: the elephant in the room', in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2019: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 305-316, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1915_25_Edwards

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Social aspects of mine closure are often not well understood, resulting in some companies either avoiding or postponing the development and implementation of sustainable social closure strategies. Delaying planning for social closure may cost companies money and incur reputational damage instead of leaving a lasting positive legacy encompassing sustainable post-mining opportunities for mining-affected communities. Within the South African context, the concept of social licence to operate is gaining traction and many companies are actively adopting policies and management practices to address this key requirement. Similarly, the value of involving communities in project planning and design to obtain a shared view on how the project will operate and close, and therefore impact on its stakeholders is gaining momentum. The benefits of co-production, a practical approach that can also assist in mitigating the negative social and environmental impacts of mine closure, has shown many benefits. These benefits include pride and a sense of ownership as well as the opportunity to develop tailored solutions that speaks specifically to each affected community. Co-production can lead to increased innovation and efficiency in the project design, operation and closure, not only with the affected community in mind, but also in collaboration with stakeholders. This process has shown to increase community satisfaction and introduce a greater sense of local ownership, which can be demonstrated by two practical examples discussed in this paper. While companies have an important role to play in contributing to a sustainable post-closure scenario, it is neither possible, nor their sole responsibility, to achieve it alone. It requires multi-stakeholder partnerships where risks, responsibilities and opportunities are shared. By acknowledging the contribution that communities can make in the sustainable operation and closure of mines, mining companies can use the concept of co-production to obtain greater acceptance or approval by local communities and stakeholders of their organisation and its operations, also known as their social licence to operate.

Keywords: social license, social closure, social transitioning, resilience, legacy, co-production

References:
Abesamis, NP, Corrigan, C, Drew, M, Campbell, S & Samonte, G 2006, Social Resilience: A Literature Review on Nuilding Resilience into Human Marine Communities in and Around MPA Networks, MPA Networks Learning Partnership, Global Conservation Program, USAID, Washington DC.
Ackermann, A, Botha, D & van der Waldt, G 2018, ‘Potential socio-economic consequences of mine closure’, The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, vol. 14, no. 1, v14i1.458
Adger, WN 2000, ‘Social and Ecological Resilience: Are They Related?’, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 24, pp. 347–364.
Alford, J 1998, ‘A public management road less travelled: clients as co‐producers of public services’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 57, no. 4, pp 128–137.
Anglo American 2014, Social Way, London.
Auditor General 2009, Report of the Auditor-General to Parliament on a Performance Audit of the Rehabilitation of Abandoned Mines at the Department of Minerals and Energy, viewed 12 March 2019,
Bainton, N & Holcombe, S 2018, ‘A critical review of the social aspects of mine closure’, Resources Policy, vol. 59, pp. 468–478.
Berkes, F & Ross, H 2013, ‘Community resilience: toward an integrated approach’, Society & Natural Resources, vol. 26, no. 1,
pp. 5–20,
Boyle, D & Harris, M 2009, ‘The challenge of co-production’, London: New Economics Foundation, pp. 185–194.
Burns, C & Church, J 2018 ‘Managing the social impacts of mine closure’, Canadian Mining Journal, viewed 27 May 2019,
Carr, S 2016, ‘Can co-production really transform UK mental health services?’, blog post, Mad in America: Science, Psychiatry and Social Justice, viewed 20 October 2016,
Department of Mineral Resources 2017, Public Labour, viewed 12 March 2019,
Department of Mineral Resources n.d., Social and Labour Plan Guidelines, viewed 12 March 2019,
Folke, C, Colding, J & F Berkes 2003, ‘Synthesis: building resilience and adaptive capacity in social-ecological systems’, in F Berkes, J Colding & C Folke (eds), Navigating Social-ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 352–387.
Haney, M & Shkaratan, M 2003, Mine Closure and its Impact on the Community: Five Years after Mine Closure in Romania, Russia and Ukraine, World Bank, Washington DC.
Hart, T 2015, ‘Mines and sustainable communities: seeking platforms for true development partnership’, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Social Responsibility in Mining, Gecamin, Santiago.
Holton, D, Kelly, M & Baker, A 2002, ‘Paradise lost? Assessment of liabilities at a uranium mine in the Slovak Republic: Novoveska Huta’, Geological Society Special Publication, vol. 198, pp. 355–377.
Jackson, R 2002, Capacity Building in Papua New Guinea for Community Maintenance During and After Mine Closure, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
Johannesburg Development Agency 2016, New Era Beckons for Noordgesig as Development Plan is Approved, Johannesburg, viewed on 27 May 2019,
Johannesburg Development Agency 2017, Noordgesig Precinct Project, video file,
Lawrie, M, Tonts, M & Plummer, P 2011, ‘Boomtowns, resource dependence and socio‐economic well‐being’, Australian Geographer, vol. 42, no 2, pp. 139–164.
Liefferink, M 2009, Submissions to the Karoo Development Conference and Trade Fair Proposed Uranium Mining Within the Beaufort West Area, The Federation for a Sustainable Environment, Bryanston, viewed 26 September 2017,
Leadership Magazine 2019, ‘Map your stakeholders to fully understand expectations and risk’, Leadership Magazine, Cape Town, viewed 27 May 2019,
Leadership Magazine 2017 ‘Facing her biggest challenge yet-food security’, Leadership Magazine, Cape Town, viewed 27 May 2019,
McCarthy TS 2011, ‘The impact of acid mine drainage in South Africa’, South African Journal of Science, vol. 107, no. 5/6, viewed 23 May 2019,
Minerals Council South Africa n.d., Housing and Accommodation in the South African Mining Industry, Johannesburg, viewed
26 March 2019,
Moolman, V 2016, ‘South Africa behind global curve’, Creamer Media’s Mining Weekly, viewed 27 May 2019,
Morelli, N 2009, ‘Service as value co-production: reframing the service design process’, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 568–590.
Needham, C 2008, ‘Realising the potential of co-production: negotiating improvements in public services’, Social Policy and Society,
Ntema, J, Marais, L, Cloete, J & Lenka, M 2017, ‘Social disruption, mine closure and housing policy: evidence from the Free State Goldfields, South Africa’, Natural Resources Forum, vol. 41, pp. 30–41.
Olalde, M 2016, ‘SA’s failed system of mine closure’, IOL, viewed 26 September 2017, from
Oosthuizen, J 2019, ‘Demand likely to grow for mine-closure expertise’, Mining Weekly, viewed 26 April 2019,
Owen, J, & Kemp, D 2017, Extractive Relations: Countervailing Power and the Global Mining Industry, Routledge, London.
Parks, RB, Baker, PC, Kiser, L, Oakerson, R, Ostrom, E, Ostrom, V, Percy, SL, Vandivort, MB, Whitaker, GP & Wilson, R 1981, ‘Consumers as coproducers of public services: Some economic and institutional considerations’, Policy Studies Journal, vol. 9, no. 7,
pp. 1001–1011.
Petrov, A 2010, ‘Post-staple bust: modeling economic effects of mine closures and post-mine demographic shifts in an arctic economy (Yukon)’, Polar Geography, vol. 33, no. 1–2, pp. 39–61.
SA Mining 2017, ‘A mine’s fastest way out of the (re)starting blocks’, viewed 12 March 2019,
South Africa 1998, National Environmental Management Act, No. 107 of 1998.
South Africa 2002, Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, No. 28 of 2002.
Statistics South Africa 2018, Mining Production Stumbles in 2018, Salvokop, viewed 12 March 2019,
Statistics South Africa 2017, Environmental Economic Accounts Compendium, Report No.: 04-05-20, Salvokop, viewed 12 March 2019,
van Tonder, DM, Coetzee, H, Esterhuyse, S, Strachan, L, Wade, P & Mudau, S 2009, ‘South Africa’s challenges pertaining to mine closure — development and implementation of regional mining and closure strategies’, in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 79–91.
Yager, TR 2004, ‘The mineral industry of South Africa’, US Geological Survey Minerals Yearbook 2004, US Geological Survey, Reston, viewed 26 April 2019,




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au