Svobodova, K 2019, 'Life post-closure: perception and use of rehabilitated mine sites by local communities', in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mine Closure
, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 333-344, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1915_27_Svobodova
The social dimensions of resource extraction have always presented a major challenge for industries. This is particularly acute towards the end of the project lifecycle when multiple pressures align. Planning for successful mine closure is a key driver in the mine design, planning and the sequencing process. This enables the mine to be progressively rehabilitated towards a well-understood and acceptable final landform and
land-use outcome. Although a significant need to better understand the social aspects of mine closure has been recognised across the industry, there is a lack of case studies that cover the long-term post-closure outcomes. Without case study material, it will not be possible to develop realistic guidance for closure practitioners considering social and community aspects. The guidance is particularly important in
densely-populated regions where open pit mines frequently overlap with sensitive ecosystems and with intangible cultural values. The study investigated how people living in close proximity to open pit mines and mine rehabilitation sites perceive their neighbouring landscapes and how they use the post-mining land in their everyday lives. A total of 40 residents from two communities in a lignite-mining region in the Czech Republic were interviewed. While one community is living adjacent to a closed mine site, the other is next to an operating mine with closure planned in 20 years. The relationship between communities and the post-mining and mining sites, as well as to the mining company operating in the area were investigated. Participants identified places that they use in their everyday activities and places with various cultural and natural values and meanings. The results show that most respondents use post-closure landscapes in their leisure time activities and appreciate their high aesthetic, recreational and natural values. Place attachment, feelings of belonging, experience of positive results of mine rehabilitation, and economic benefits played a key role in the communities’ perception. The study introduced a spatially-explicit qualitative approach that can assist in maximising the beneficial use of post-mining land, in particular to evaluate the restoration success of post-mining sites.
Keywords: mine closure, social impact, community engagement, relinquishment
Agyeman, J, Devine-Wright, P & Prange, J 2009, ‘Close to the edge, down by the river? Joining up managed retreat and place attachment in a climate changed world’, Environment and Planning A, vol. 41, pp. 509–513.
Amundsen, H 2015, ‘Place attachment as a driver of adaptation in coastal communities in Northern Norway’, Local Environment, vol. 20, pp. 257–276.
ArcGIS 2019, World Imagery, viewed 30 March 2019
Bebbington, A & Bebbington, HD 2018, ‘Mining, movements and sustainable development: Concepts for a framework’, Sustainable Development, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 441–449.
Cresswell, T 2004, Place: A Short Introduction, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken.
Czech Republic 1988, Zákon č. 44/1988 Sb., o ochraně a vyusití nerostného bohatství [Act No. 44/1988, on the protection and utilisation of mineral resources].
Czech Statistical Office 2012, Historická ročenka statistiky energetiky – 2012 [Historical Yearbook of Energy Statistics – 2012], viewed 28 March 2019,
Environmental System Research Institute 2016, Overlay Toolset, viewed 30 March 2019,
Environmental Systems Research Institute 2018, ArcGIS Desktop, version 10.6, computer software, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands.
European Association for Coal and Lignite 2018, EURACOAL Market Report 1/2018, viewed 29 March 2019,
Frantál, B 2016, ‘Living on coal: Mined-out identity, community displacement and forming of anti-coal resistance in the Most region, Czech Republic’, Resources Policy, vol. 49, pp. 385–393.
Geertz, C 1996, ‘Afterword’, in S Feld & KH Basso (eds), Senses of Place, School of American Research Press, Santa Fe.
Geoportal CUZK 2019, WMS view service - ZM 25, viewed 3 June 2019,
Hendrychová, M & Kabrna, M 2016, ‘An analysis of 200-year-long changes in a landscape affected by large-scale surface coal mining: History, present and future’, Applied Geography, vol. 74, pp. 151–159.
Ministry of Industry and Trade 2014, State Energy Policy of the Czech Republic, Prague, viewed 3 June 2019,
Owen, JR & Kemp, D 2015, ‘Mining-induced displacement and resettlement: A critical appraisal’, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 87, pp. 478–488.
Petrova, S & Marinova, D 2013, ‘Social impacts of mining: changes within the local social landscape’, Rural Society, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 153–165.
Říha, M, Stoklasa, J, Lafarová, M, Dejmal, I, Marek, J & Pakosta, P 2005, Environmental Mining Limits in North Bohemian Lignite Region, Society for Landscape, Prague.
van der Plank, S, Walsh, B & Behrens, P 2016, ‘The expected impacts of mining: Stakeholder perceptions of a proposed mineral sands mine in rural Australia’. Resources Policy, vol. 48, pp129–136.
Zvarivadza, T 2018 ‘Large scale miners-Communities partnerships: A plausible option for communities survival beyond mine closure‘, Resources Policy, vol. 56, pp. 87–94.