Authors: Shrivathsa, A; Cooper, S

Open access courtesy of:


Cite As:
Shrivathsa, A & Cooper, S 2019, 'An interjurisdictional approach to designing residual risk policy', in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2019: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 511-524,

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero

In late February this year, the Queensland Government hosted 40 government delegates from New South Wales, Victoria and the Northern Territory for a 2.5-day workshop discussing government policy on residual risks in the resource industry. Residual risks of post-closure management are considered those risks that remain on a site after surrender of the resource and/or environmental authority or permit. These could include the potential for a credible risk event occurring and requiring rectification and ongoing monitoring and maintenance requirements. Government representatives from environmental and mining regulation departments shared information, research and results of consultation through presentations and discussions. Through facilitated workshops, government officials identified common issues and worked to develop potential solutions. A major outcome of the workshop was a set of guiding principles available to all Australian jurisdictions, when developing or implementing residual risk policy. At this stage, the principles should not be taken to be current government policy. This presentation and paper will give conference attendees an overview of the issues raised throughout the workshop, the outcomes and next steps.

Keywords: residual risk, rehabilitation, collaboration, policy development, post-closure

Government of New South Wales 1979, Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, Australia.
Government of Northern Territory 2001, Mining Management Act 2001, Australia.
Government of Victoria 2019, Mineral Resources (Sustainable Development) (Mineral Industries) Regulations 2019, Australia.
Hazelwood Mine Fire Inquiry 2016, Hazelwood Mine Fire Inquiry Report 2015/2016: Volume IV—Mine Rehabilitation, viewed 2 April 2019,
IDEO ca. 2008, Design Thinking Defined, viewed 22 March 2019,
Interaction Design Foundation 2019, 5 Stages in the Design Thinking Process, viewed 22 March 2019,
State of Queensland 2018, Managing Residual Risks in Queensland Discussion Paper, Brisbane,
The UK Design Council 2015, The Design Process: What is the Double Diamond?, News and Opinion—Features, viewed 22 March 2019,

© Copyright 2022, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries or error reports to