Green, R, Linklater, C, Lee, S, Terrusi, L & Glasson, K 2019, 'Rio Tinto’s framework for evaluating risks from low sulfur waste rock', in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2019: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mine Closure
, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 855-870, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1915_68_Green
There is an increasing need in mine closure studies for a toolbox of procedures designed specifically for application to low sulfur waste types – to help build confidence in the generally accepted premise that these wastes have a low risk profile. Historically, mine waste characterisation efforts have focused on materials with elevated sulfur. This is warranted due to the greater risk associated with acid and metalliferous drainage from potentially acid forming wastes. Test procedures for materials with elevated sulfur are well established. Regarding low sulfur and non-acid forming materials, the toolbox of geochemical characterisation procedures can vary significantly depending on personal preference and jurisdictions.
The framework for geochemical characterisation of low sulfur waste materials at Rio Tinto’s Pilbara Mines will be presented. This framework involves phased testing, starting initially with a wide range of samples from different locations and depths. Progressively more detailed tests are undertaken, depending on the waste storage conditions and unresolved issues or uncertainty. Risk assessments are undertaken in conjunction with geochemical testing to evaluate risks posed by waste material properties and tonnages. There is no ‘one size fits all’ test method for low sulfur waste material. This Rio Tinto framework provides flexibility by using a combination of test methods to understand and, if necessary, appropriately manage any risks identified.
Keywords: neutral mine drainage, geochemistry, mineral waste management
Bowen, HJM 1979, Environmental Chemistry of the Elements, Academic Press, London.
Förstner, U, Ahlf, W & Calmano, W 1993, ‘Sediment quality objectives and criteria development in Germany’, Water Science & Technology, vol. 28, pp. 307–316.
Green, R & Borden, R 2011, ‘Geochemical risk assessment process for Rio Tinto’s Pilbara iron ore mines’, Integrated Waste Management, vol. 1, ch. 19, pp. 365–390.
Kosson, DS, Garrabrants, A, Thorneloe, S, Fagnant, D, Helms, G, Connolly, K & Rodgers, M 2017, Leaching Environmental Assessment Framework (LEAF) How-To Guide, United States Environmental Protection Agency.
Linklater, CM, Chapman, J, Brown, PL, Green, R & Leake, S 2014, ‘Assessing metal leachability from low sulphur wastes – Sequential extraction methods’, in H Miller & L Preuss (eds), Proceedings of the Seventh Australian Workshop on Acid Drainage, Adelaide, pp. 325–337.
Stantec Consulting Ltd. 2004, ‘Review of Water Quality Issues in Neutral pH Drainage: Examples and Emerging Priorities for the Mining Industry in Canada’, The MEND Initiative,