Life cycle assessment of tailings management options: a conceptual case study in Western Australia
|
Authors: Carneiro, A; Fourie, AB Open access courtesy of:
|
DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1915_93_Carneiro
Cite As:
Carneiro, A & Fourie, AB 2019, 'Life cycle assessment of tailings management options: a conceptual case study in Western Australia', in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2019: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1165-1184, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1915_93_Carneiro
Abstract:
The vast amount of waste produced by the mining industry, of which a large proportion is tailings, has the potential to cause numerous environmental problems, and represents a possible barrier to sustainability. Although the choice of a strategy for tailings management has historically been dictated primarily by technical and economic factors, the sustainability of the selected tailings disposal method is becoming increasingly important in decision-making. Life cycle assessment (LCA) has been widely adopted as an environmental systems analysis tool and can be used for evaluating the environmental impacts of mining and mineral processing operations from a life cycle perspective. In spite of its appeal, however, the application of LCA in the mining industry, especially in tailings management is still a work in progress. Aimed at addressing this research gap, this paper reports on the results of a cradle-to-grave LCA study carried out to investigate the environmental profile of two different tailings management options. A conceptual case study for the disposal of gold tailings in Western Australia as a slurry, or as filtered tailings, was considered. The environmental impacts of each option were assessed, environmental hotspots were identified, and cleaner production measures were suggested to improve the overall environmental performance of tailings operations in Australia. In the context of mine waste management, this paper ends with a discussion addressing the benefits and challenges of applying LCA as an environmental decision-support tool, providing more information to the decision-making process and facilitating better communication with stakeholders.
Keywords: tailings management, life cycle assessment, renewable energy, sustainable mining
References:
Adiansyah, JS, Haque, N, Rosano, M & Biswas, W 2017, ‘Application of a life cycle assessment to compare environmental performance in coal mine tailings management’, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 199, pp. 181–191.
Awuah-Offei, K & Adekpedjou, A 2011, ‘Application of life cycle assessment in the mining industry’, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 16, pp. 82–89.
Awuah-Offei, K, Checkel, D & Askari-Nasab, H 2009, ‘Evaluation of belt conveyor and truck haulage systems in an open pit mine using life cycle assessment’, CCIM Bulletin, p. 1116.
Balanay, RM & Halog, A 2017, ‘Promoting life cycle thinking for sustainability in the mining sector of the Philippines’, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 22, pp. 1864–1874.
Bare, JC 2002, ‘TRACI — The Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other Environmental Impacts’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 6, pp. 49–78.
Blight, GE 2008, ‘Wind erosion of waste impoundments in arid climates and mitigation of dust pollution’, Waste Management & Research, vol. 26, pp. 523–533.
Carneiro, A & Fourie, AB 2017, ‘Economic evaluation for the disposal of slurry versus thickened tailings in Western Australia – A case study’, in GW Wilson, DC Sego & NA Beier (eds), Proceedings of the Twenty-first International Conference on Tailings and Mine Waste, University of Alberta Geotechnical Centre, Edmonton, pp. 138–149.
Delft University of Technology 2017, The Model of the Eco-costs/Value Ratio (EVR), viewed 24 March 2019,
Dong, Y, Miraglia, S, Manzo, S, Georgiadis, S, Sørup, HJD, Boriani, E, Hald, T, Thöns, S & Hauschild, MZ 2018, ‘Environmental sustainable decision making – The need and obstacles for integration of LCA into decision analysis’, Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 87, pp. 33–44.
Durucan, S, Korre, A & Munoz-Melendez, G 2006, ‘Mining life cycle modelling: a cradle-to-gate approach to environmental management in the minerals industry’, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 14, pp. 1057–1070.
Edraki, M, Baumgartl, T, Manlapig, E, Bradshaw, D, Franks, DM & Moran, CJ 2014, ‘Designing mine tailings for better environmental, social and economic outcomes: a review of alternative approaches’, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 84, pp. 411–420.
Erkayaoğlu, M & Demirel, N 2016, ‘A comparative life cycle assessment of material handling systems for sustainable mining’, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 174, pp. 1–6.
Espinoza, RD & Morris, JWF 2017, ‘Towards sustainable mining (part II): accounting for mine reclamation and post reclamation care liabilities’, Resources Policy, vol. 52, pp. 29–38.
International Council on Mining and Metals 2016, Position statement on preventing catastrophic failure of tailings storage facilities, viewed 1 October 2018,
International Organization for Standardization 2006a, ISO 14040:2006 Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Principles and Framework,
International Organization for Standardization 2006b, ISO 14044:2006 Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Requirements and Guidelines,
Kounina, A, Margni, M, Shaked, S, Bulle, C & Jolliet, O 2014, ‘Spatial analysis of toxic emissions in LCA: A sub-continental nested USEtox model with freshwater archetypes’, Environment International, vol. 69, pp. 67–89.
Manuilova, A, Suebsiri, J & Wilson, M 2009, ‘Should Life Cycle Assessment be part of the Environmental Impact Assessment? Case study: EIA of CO2 Capture and Storage in Canada’, Energy Procedia, vol. 1, pp. 4511–4518.
Moffat, K & Zhang, A 2014, ‘The paths to social licence to operate: An integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining’, Resource Policy, vol. 39, pp. 61–70.
Norgate, T & Haque, N 2010, ‘Energy and greenhouse gas impacts of mining and mineral processing operations’, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 18, pp. 266–274.
PRé Consultants 2019, SimaPro, version 9.0.0.35, computer software, PRé Consultants, Amersfoort, https://simapro.com
Reid, C, Aubertin, M, Deschênes, L, Bussière, B & Bécaert, V 2007, ‘Application of life cycle assessment (LCA) to sulphidic tailings management’, Proceedings of the Mining and the Environment IV Conference, Sudbury, pp. 19–27.
Reid, C, Bécaert, V, Aubertin, M, Rosenbaum, RK & Deschênes, L 2009, ‘Life cycle assessment of mine tailings management in Canada’, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 17, pp. 471–479.
Renouf, MA, Grant, T, Sevenster, M, Logie, J, Ridoutt, B, Ximenes, F, … Lane, J 2018, Best Practice Guide for Mid-Point Life Cycle Impact Assessment in Australia, viewed 15 March 2019, in
Solomon, S, Qin, D, Manning, M, Averyt, K & Marquis, M 2007, Climate change 2007 – the physical science basis: Working group I contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Song, X, Pettersen, JB, Pedersen, KB & Røberg, S 2017, ‘Comparative life cycle assessment of tailings management and energy scenarios for a copper ore mine: A case study in Northern Norway’, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 164, pp. 892–904.
Tukker, A 2000, ‘Life cycle assessment as a tool in environmental impact assessment’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 20, pp. 435–456.
van Zyl, D 2008, ‘Life cycle assessment and tailings management trade-off studies – concepts’, Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Tailings and Mine Waste, pp. 355–358.
© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au