Authors: Naseri, S; Bahrani, N

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1925_21_Bahrani

Cite As:
Naseri, S & Bahrani, N 2019, 'Stability assessment of initial shotcrete lining using two-dimensional continuum numerical modelling', in J Hadjigeorgiou & M Hudyma (eds), Ground Support 2019: Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Underground Construction, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 311-326, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1925_21_Bahrani

Abstract:
The convergence–confinement method (CCM) is a simple tool for the preliminary design of ground support for circular excavations. The influence of excavation advance rate on the design of a support system is often ignored using the CCM. In this paper, a two-dimensional (2D) continuum numerical modelling approach for support design is introduced, which integrates the excavation advance rate into the CCM. The numerical simulations are carried out based on the results of a previously calibrated 2D finite element model of an instrumented section of a 10 m diameter shaft in an average-quality rock mass. First, the internal pressure reduction approach is used to simulate the three-dimensional shaft advance and to generate the ground reaction curve (GRC). The longitudinal displacement profile (LDP) is calculated using a semi-empirical approach. The LDP is then integrated with the GRC to determine the radial displacements corresponding to the locations of the shaft face and initial shotcrete liner. Knowing the shaft advance rate allows determination of the appropriate mechanical properties of early-age shotcrete based on empirical equations. The paper presents three approaches for analysing the stability of the shotcrete liner. The first approach is based on calculating the load Factor of Safety using support-capacity diagrams. In the second approach, the load Factor of Safety is calculated using the conventional CCM. In the third approach, the strain Factor of Safety is calculated by considering the plastic deformation of early-age shotcrete. The minimum allowable shotcrete thickness is then determined by calculating the load and strain Factors of Safety for different lining thicknesses. It is suggested that a combination of these approaches provides a deeper insight into the complex behaviour of early-age shotcrete lining during excavation advance compared with the conventional CCM.

Keywords: initial shotcrete lining, convergence–confinement method, ground reaction curve, longitudinal displacement profile, 2D numerical modelling, support-capacity diagram, strain Factor of Safety

References:
Carranza-Torres, C 2004, ‘Elasto-plastic solution of tunnel problems using the generalized form of the Hoek-Brown failure criterion’, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 629–639.
Carranza-Torres, C & Diederichs, M 2009, ‘Mechanical analysis of circular liners with particular reference to composite supports.
For example, liners consisting of shotcrete and steel sets’, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 506–532.
Carranza-Torres, C & Fairhurst, C 2000, ‘Application of the convergence-confinement method of tunnel design to rock masses that satisfy the Hoek-Brown failure criterion’, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 187–213.
Chang, Y 1994, Tunnel Support with Shotcrete in Weak Rock: A Rock Mechanics Study, PhD thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Chern, JC, Shiao, FY & Yu, CW 1998, ‘An empirical safety criterion for tunnel construction’, Proceedings of the Regional Symposium on Sedimentary Rock Engineering, Public Construction Commission, Taipei, pp. 222–227.
Comité Euro-international du Béton & Fédération Internationale de la Précontrainte 1990, CEB-FIP Model Code 1990: Design Code, Thomas Telford, London.
Duncan Fama, ME 1993, ‘Numerical modelling of yield zones in weak rock’, in JA Hudson (ed.), Comprehensive Rock Engineering, 2, Pergamon, Oxford, pp. 49–75.
Gschwandtner, GG & Galler, R 2012, ‘Input to the application of the convergence confinement method with time-dependent material behaviour of the support’, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 13–22.
Itasca 2009, FLAC3D, version 3.3, Itasca, Minneapolis.
John, M & Mattle, B 2003, ‘Shotcrete lining design: Factors of influence’, Proceedings of Rapid Excavation and Tunnelling Conference (RETC), Society for Mining Metallurgy and Exploration, Englewood, pp. 726–734.
Meschke, G, Kropik, C & Mang, H 1996, ‘Numerical analysis of tunnel linings by means of a viscoplastic material model for shotcrete’, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 39, no. 18, pp. 3145–3162.
Oke, J, Vlachopoulos, N & Diederichs, MS 2018, ‘Improvement to the convergence-confinement method: inclusion of support installation proximity and stiffness’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1495–1519, .
Oreste, P 2003, ‘A procedure for determining the reaction curve of shotcrete lining considering transient conditions’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 209–236.
Oreste, P & Pelia, D 1997, ‘Modelling progressive hardening of shotcrete in convergence-confinement approach to tunnel design’ Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 425–431.
Panet, M & Guenot, A 1982, ‘Analysis of convergence behind the face of a tunnel’, Proceedings of the International Symposium Tunnelling, Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London, pp. 197–204.
Rafiei Renani, H, Martin, C & Hudson, R 2016, ‘Back analysis of rock mass displacements around a deep shaft using two- and threedimensional continuum modelling’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1313–1327.
in M Hudyma & Y Potvin (eds), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Underground Mining Technology, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 55–70.
Rocscience 2011, Phase2, version 8, computer software, Rocscience, Toronto.
Rocscience 2014, RS2, version 9, computer software, Rocscience, Toronto.
Saw, HA, Villaescusa, E, Windsor, CR & Thompson, AG 2009, ‘Non-linear elastic – plastic response of steel fibre reinforced shotcrete to uniaxial and triaxial compression testing’, Proceedings of Shotcrete for Underground Support XI, Engineering Conferences International, Davos.
Schubert, P 1988, ‘Beitrag zum rheologischen Verhalten von Spritzbeton’, Felsbau, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 150–153.
Unlu, T & Gercek, H 2003, ‘Effect of Poisson’s ratio on the normalized radial displacements occurring around the face of a circular tunnel’, Tunnel and Underground Space Technology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 547–553.
Vlachopoulos, N & Diederichs, MS 2009, ‘Improved longitudinal displacement profiles for convergence confinement analysis of deep tunnels’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 131–146.
Vlachopoulos, N & Diederichs, MS 2014, ‘Appropriate uses and practical limitations of 2D numerical analysis of tunnels and tunnel support response’, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 469–488.