Explicit discrete fracture network numerical analyses of the stability of underground stopes and effects of cable bolt support at Raglan Mine

Authors: Lavoie, T; Andrieux, P; Guido, S; Caumartin, R Download Paper

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1925_22_Andrieux

Cite As:
Lavoie, T, Andrieux, P, Guido, S & Caumartin, R 2019, 'Explicit discrete fracture network numerical analyses of the stability of underground stopes and effects of cable bolt support at Raglan Mine', in J Hadjigeorgiou & M Hudyma (eds), Ground Support 2019: Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Underground Construction, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 327-340, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1925_22_Andrieux



Abstract:
Within the frame of the 2018 feasibility study of the Raglan Mine Mining Project 14 in northern Quebec, stability analyses of longhole stopes and the effects of cablebolting were conducted in the form of advanced three-dimensional discrete fracture network (DFN) simulations. DFN analyses examine, in an explicit manner, the potential for strata to loosen and unravel, and wedges to form and fall along various excavation surfaces due to local joint sets. A DFN model is a randomly generated explicit representation of a unique set of discrete fractures whose geometrical characteristics—in terms of orientation, spacing and persistence—honour the statistical description of the joint sets present in the local rock mass. The kinematic stability of that unique situation is then examined in a direct manner with the 3D discontinuum-based 3DEC numerical code. Since each DFN model, or ‘realisation’, is randomly generated and unique, multiple realisations are required to derive statistical confidence in the outcome. This paper describes the DFN methodology, discusses two means of populating a realisation (through the joint sets statistics or by ‘bootstrapping’ the characterisation data), introduces the velocity-based stability criterion retained for the analyses, and presents and compares results, with and without tendon ground support.

Keywords: numerical modelling, discrete fracture network, support design

References: