Authors: Naicker, N


DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1952_26_Naicker

Cite As:
Naicker, N 2019, 'Seismic response to mining the massive ore body at South Deep gold mine', in W Joughin (ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Johannesburg, pp. 347-362, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1952_26_Naicker

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Mining currently takes place at depths of between 2400 m and 2650 m below surface at South Deep gold mine. The ore body comprises Witwatersrand conglomerates and varies from 1 m to 120 m thick and extends over several kilometres. A mining method, specific to the geometry of the ore body, is utilized and comprises an initial destressing cut followed by massive mining in the destressed shadow. A high profile stoping (HPS) mining method was introduced to reduce or eliminate many of the mining difficulties experienced with the previous low profile stoping (LPS) method. A system of regional stabilising pillars, together with the placement of backfill is utilized to minimise seismic energy emissions. Improvements to the ground support to mitigate rockburst damage were introduced and further improvements are ongoing. A mine-wide seismic system comprising 35 sensors is used to monitor seismic activity. Attempts to improve seismic monitoring include velocity calibrations, sensor orientation studies, more accurate determination of the attenuation factor (Q) and batch reprocessing of data to ensure consistency across software versions. In this paper, the level of seismic activity in relation to the level of production, inclusive of production ramp ups and stoppages, from different sections of the mine, is evaluated. The type and severity of damage to workings is assessed together with a comparison of peak particle velocities at the damage locations. Preconditioning, other rockburst risk mitigation strategies and the sources of seismicity (in particular the role of geological features), are assessed. The seismic hazard for different periods of time is calculated.

References:
Clark, R. and Gerber, J. (2018). Velocity Calibration and Sensor Orientation for South Deep Mine - Gold Fields. Report No. SDM-REP-VelocityCalibration-201810-IMSv0 (004). Institute of Mine Seismology, Stellenbosch, SA. 12 pp.
Gold Fields (2017). The Gold Fields Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Supplement to the IAR 2017. 2017-hires.pdf, [Accessed 18 Feb. 2019].
Green, M. and Gerber, J. (2018). Intermediate- and Long-Term Seismic Hazard at South Deep Mine. Report No. SDM-HAZ-REP-201711-MGv0. Institute of Mine Seismology, Stellenbosch, SA. 11 pp.
Jurkevics, A. (1988). Polarization analysis of three-component array data. Bulletin of the Seismological
Society of America. October 1988. Volume 78, No. 5, pp. 1725–1743.
Mendecki, A. J. (2013). Frequency range, logE, logP and magnitude. Proceedings of the 8th International
Symposium on Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines. September 2013, pp. 167–173.
Mendecki, A. J. (2016). Mine Seismology Reference Book: Seismic Hazard, 1 ed. Institute of Mine
Seismology. ISBN 978-0-9942943-0-2, www.imseismology.org/msrb/. 3
Potvin, Y., and Wesseloo, J. (2013). Towards an understanding of dynamic demand on ground support. The Journal of The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Volume 113, December 2013, pp. 913–922.
Toper, A.Z., Kabongo, K.K., Stewart, R.D., and Daehnke, A. (2000). The mechanism, optimization and effects of preconditioning. The Journal of The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, January/February 2000, pp. 7–15.




© Copyright 2020, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au