Goldswain, G 2020, 'Advances in seismic monitoring technologies', in J Wesseloo (ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Underground Mining Technology
, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 173-188, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2035_05
There have been several significant advances in seismic monitoring technologies and methods applied in mines in the past decade. Ranging from optical vibration sensors, through to low power and small footprint nodal sensor technologies, to imaging methods using induced seismicity and ambient noise. These new technologies and methods are starting to be applied to a range of applications in the underground mining environment. To support the ever-widening range of applications, seismic instrumentation and monitoring systems are evolving. We discuss some of the more significant developments, such as combining conventional sensors with more exotic sensors to produce hybrid sensors, and how nodal sensing technologies have inspired more portable and lower-power hardware. Some examples of recent products from the Institute of Mine Seismology (IMS) stable are presented to demonstrate these new acquisition technologies and finally, a few real-world application examples are presented which showcase how novel data collection and processing methodologies are being used in underground mines by IMS.
Keywords: seismic monitoring, seismic sensors, distributed acoustic sensors, distributed sensors, nodal sensors, hybrid sensors, microseismic, passive seismic, tailings dam monitoring
Bensen, G, Ritzwoller, M, Barmin, M, Levshin, A, Lin, F, Moschetti, M…& Yang, Y 2007, ‘Processing seismic ambient noise data to obtain reliable broad-band surface wave dispersion measurements’, Geophysical Journal International, vol. 169,
Brenguier, F, Rivet, D, Obermann, A, Nakata, N, Boué, P, Lecocq, T…& Shapiro, N 2016, ‘4-D noise-based seismology at volcanoes: ongoing efforts and perspectives’, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, vol. 321, pp. 182–195.
Dales, P, Pinzon‐Ricon, L, Brenguier, F, Boué, P, Arndt, N, McBride, J…& Olivier, G 2020, ‘Virtual sources of body waves from noise correlations in a mineral exploration context’, Seismological Research Letters, vol. 91, no. 4 pp. 2278–2286.
Deutsches Institut für Normung 2019, Measurement of Vibration Immissions – Part 1: Vibration meters – Requirements and Tests (DIN 45669-1:2019-09), DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung, Berlin.
de Wit, T & Olivier, G 2018, 'Imaging and monitoring tailings dam walls with ambient seismic noise', in RJ Jewell & AB Fourie (eds), Proceedings of the 21st International Seminar on Paste and Thickened Tailings, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 455–464.
Goldswain, G 2018, ‘The IMS Seismic Monitoring System’, in X Feng (ed.), Rockburst Mechanisms, Monitoring, Warning and Mitigation, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
Hartog, AH 2017, An Introduction to Distributed Optical Fibre Sensors, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
Hollis, D, McBride, J, Good, D, Arndt, N, Brenguier, F, & Olivier, G 2018, ‘Use of ambient noise surface wave tomography in mineral resource exploration and evaluation’, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, pp. 1937–1940.
Inbal, A, Clayton, R & Ampuero, J 2015, ‘Imaging widespread seismicity at midlower crustal depths beneath Long Beach, CA, with a dense seismic array: Evidence for a depth-dependent earthquake size distribution’, Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 42, pp. 6314–6323.
International Society of Explosives Engineers 2017, ISEE Performance Specifications for Blasting Seismographs, International Society of Explosives Engineers, Cleveland.
Li, Z, Peng, Z, Hollis, D, Zhu, L, & McClellan, J 2018, ‘High-resolution seismic event detection using local similarity for large-N arrays’, Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1646.
McGarr, A 1991, ‘Observations constraining near-source ground motion estimated from locally recorded seismograms’, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 96, no. B10, pp. 16,495–16,508.
Mendecki, A 1997, Seismic Monitoring in Mines, Chapman & Hall, London.
Mendecki, A 2013, ‘Frequency range, logE, logP and magnitude’, in D Malovichko & A Malovichko (eds), Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines, Geophysical Survey of Russian Academy of Sciences, Obninsk,
and Mining Institute of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Perm, pp. 167–173.
Olivier, G, Brenguier, F, de Wit, T & Lynch, R 2017, ‘Monitoring the stability of tailings dam walls with ambient seismic noise’, The Leading Edge, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 282–368.
Olivier, G, de Wit, T, Brenguier, F, Bezuidenhout, L & Kunjwa, T 2018, ‘Ambient noise Love wave tomography at a gold mine tailings storage facility’, Géotechnique Letters, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1–17.
Rebuli, D, Goldswain, G & Lynch, R 2017, ‘High Quality Microseismic Monitoring in Mines: Accelerometers or Geophones?’, in J Vallejos (ed), Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines, Santiago, pp. 23–31.
Standards Australia 2006, Australian Standard Explosives - Storage and use Part 2: Use of explosives (AS 2187.2-2006), Standards Australia, Sydney.
United States Bureau of Mines 1989, Report of Investigations 8507 (RI 8507) - Structure Response and Damage Produced by Ground Vibration from Surface Mine Blasting, Pittsburgh.
Wang, H, Fratta D, Lord N, Zeng X & Coleman, T 2018, ‘Distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) field trials for near-surface geotechnical properties, earthquake seismology, and mine monitoring’, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, pp. 4953–4957.
Willis, M, Ajo-Franklin, J & Roy, B 2017, ‘Special Section: Geophysical applications of fiber-optic distributed sensing’, The Leading Edge, vol. 36, no. 12.
Zhan, Z 2019, ‘Distributed acoustic sensing turns fiber-optic cables into sensitive seismic antennas’, Seismological Research Letters, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 1–15.