Authors: Balt, A; Batdelger, E; Odsuren, B; Sainbileg, U; Enkhtuya, A; Hamilton, JD; Bazartseren, B

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2152_41

Cite As:
Balt, A, Batdelger, E, Odsuren, B, Sainbileg, U, Enkhtuya, A, Hamilton, JD & Bazartseren, B 2021, 'Land rehabilitation in arid Gobi Desert environment using native plant species ', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & A Sharkuu (eds), Mine Closure 2021: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Mine Closure, QMC Group, Ulaanbaatar, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2152_41

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
The ability to rehabilitate disturbed lands and restore ecosystem processes is an important part of the mine closure process, as functional ecosystems maintain long-term biodiversity and ecosystem services values. The Oyu Tolgoi (OT) Mine, located in Umnugobi Aimag, southern Mongolia has to overcome several challenges to develop processes that will assist in the rehabilitation and restoration of areas disturbed by mining development activities. The first challenge was an early commitment to using only native species, which relates to the second challenge posed by the harsh desert climate that the mine is located in. The unprecedented decision to use only native species was a challenge as little research had previously been done on how to grow native Gobi Desert plant species and use them in rehabilitation efforts. This knowledge gap led to the creation of the OT Native Plant Propagation Center (NPPC) in Khanbogd Soum, to conduct research into the collection of seeds, propagation of plants, and preparing seeds and saplings for restoration work. By starting rehabilitation programs early (during the construction stage), OT has had time to develop and test rehabilitation methods and begin to rehabilitate areas to provide time for plants to establish and grow. While OT is still in the construction phase, it has already amassed 10 years of experience in growing native Gobi plant species and rehabilitating disturbed areas through the drill seeding and hydroseeding as well sapling planting method. Preliminary results of comparing biologically rehabilitated areas, where three different methods were applied at the same time, to the background control showed that the sapling planted area showed the greatest similarity (75%) and no difference in vegetation cover and biomass (t = -0.88, p = 0.40; t = -0.22, p = 0.83) with the control. In contrast, the similarity of the hydroseeded area was 45.5%, while the drill seeded area was the least similar to the control area (0%). This suggests that the sapling planting method was the most successful rehabilitation method. However, the study will be continued to include more rehabilitated areas and allow more time for vegetation recovery in rehabilitated areas

References:
Badarch, M, Dorjgotov, B & Enkhbat, A 2009, Mongolian’s fourth national report on implementation of convention of biological diversity. , 70, 94–110.
Balt, A, Batsuuri, D & Purevsuren, U 2018, Rehabilitation handover report of Nariin Zag forest, Khanbogd soum, SouthGobi province. Oyu Tolgoi LLC.
Balt, A 2011, Vegetation pattern and environmental factors in Semi-Desert and Desert Areas of Mongolia : Case Study in Khanbogd Soum. 26.
Belsky, AJ, Amundson, RG, Duxbury, JM, Riha, SJ, Ali, AR & Mwonga, SM 1989, ‘The effects of trees on their physical, chemical, and biological environments in a semi-arid savanna in Kenya’. Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 26, pp. 1005–1024.
Boyer, S & Wratten, SD 2010, ‘The potential of earthworm to restore ecosystem services after opencast mining-A review’. Basic Applied Ecology, vol. 11, pp. 196-203.
Bucharova, A, Durka, W, Hölzel, N, Kollmann, J, Michalski, S & Bossdorf, O 2017, ‘Are local plants the best for ecosystem restoration? It depends on how you analyze the data’. Ecology and Evolution, vol. 7, no. 24, pp. 10683–10689.
Bullock, JM 1998, ‘Community translocation in Britain: Setting objectives and measuring consequences’. Biological Conservation, vol. 84, pp. 199–214.
Courtright, EM & Van Zee, JW 2011, ‘The database for inventory, monitoring, and assessment (DIMA)’. Rangelands, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 21–26.
Gann, GD, McDonald, T, Walder, B, Aronson, J, Nelson, CR, Jonson, J, Hallett, JG, … Dixon, KW 2019, ‘International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Second edition’. Restoration Ecology, vol. 27, no. S1, pp. S1–S46.
Indree, T 2014, Монгол орны хээрийн ургамалжилт [The steppe vegetation of Mongolia]. Bembi san.
Khaulenbek, A 2014, Location of Gobi oases in South Gobi; current status and potential for rehabilitation in Gobi oases (Report). Institute of Geography and Geoecology.
Kiehl, K, Kirmer, A, Donath, TW, Rasran, L & H€olzel, N 2010, ‘Species introduction in restoration projects – evaluation of different techniques for the establishment of semi-natural grasslands in Central and Northwestern Europe’. Basic and Applied Ecology, vol. 11, pp. 285–299.
Mineral Resources and Petroleum Authority of Mongolia 2021, Mineral resources and petroleum statistic's report.
Mongolian Academy of Sciences 1990, National atlas of Mongolia.
Oyu Tolgoi LLC. 2011, Report on the implementation of the environmental protection plan. /reports/Environment/
Oyu Tolgoi LLC. 2018, Report on the implementation of the environmental protection plan. /reports/Environment/
Oyu Tolgoi LLC. 2020, Report on the implementation of the environmental protection plan. /reports/Environment/
Pankova, H, Munzbergova, Z, Rydlova, J & Vosatka, M 2008, ‘Differences in AM fungal root colonization between population of perennial Aster species have genetic reasons’. Oecologia, vol. 157, pp. 211-220.
Pywell, RF, Bullock, JM, Tallowin, JB, Walker, KJ, Warman, EA & Masters, G 2007, ‘Enhancing diversity of species-poor grassland: An experimental assessment of multiple constraints’. Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 44, pp. 81–94.
Yunatov, AA 1977, Бүгд Найрамдах Монгол Ард Улсын ургамлан нөмрөгийн үндсэн шинжүүд [Основные черты растительного покрова Монгольской Народной Республики]. State Publication House, Ulaanbaatar.
Tiedemann, AR & Klemmedson, JO 1973, ‘Nutrient availability in desert grassland soils under mesquite (Prosopis juliflora) trees and adjacent open areas’. Soil Science Society of America, vol. 37, pp. 107–11.
Tiedemann, AR & Klemmedson, JO 2004. ‘Responses of desert grassland vegetation to mesquite removal and regrowth’. Journal Range Management, vol. 57, pp. 455–465.
Vander Mijnsbrugge, K, Bischoff, A & Smith, B 2010, ‘A question of origin: Where and how to collect seed for ecological restoration’. Basic and Applied Ecology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 300–311.
Veste, M, Littmann, T, Friedrich, H & Breckle, SW 2001, ‘Microclimatic boundary conditions for activity of soil lichen crusts in sand dunes of the north-western Negev desert, Israel’. Flora, vol. 196, no. 6, pp. 465-474.
Walker, KJ, Stevens, PA, Stevens, DP, Mountford, JO, Manchester, SJ & Pywell, RF 2004, ‘There storation and re-creation of species rich lowland grassland on land formerly managed for intensive agriculture in the UK’. Biological Conservation, vol. 119, pp. 1–18.
Wesche, K & Treiber, J 2012 ‘Abiotic and biotic determinants of steppe productivity and performance–a view from Central Asia’. in MJA Werger & MA van Staalduinen (eds.) Eurasian steppes. Ecological problems and livelihoods in a changing world, Springer, Dordrecht.




© Copyright 2021, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au