Authors: Villa, D; Romero, J; Soto, N

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2205_01

Cite As:
Villa, D, Romero, J & Soto, N 2022, 'Multi-lifts selection using scenario simulation and financial metrics', in Y Potvin (ed.), Caving 2022: Fifth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 51-66, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2205_01

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
In evaluating a block caving project, one of the most important strategic decisions is the location of the extraction level. This evaluation is complex for a single lift; therefore, finding the optimum combination of multiple lifts is much more challenging and, in most cases, sub-optimal since the decision is largely influenced by the selection of one of them and not the overall value. This paper proposes the option to simulate as many scenarios as possible, analysing the size of each lift based on multiple evaluations using variable shut off grades and production rates. This analysis enables exploring many strategies and using the hill of value technique to identify areas of optimum solutions in a reasonable time. For example, starting with a small Lift1 extracting high grade with a low production target to reduce initial capital cost and ramp-up to maximum production capacity in the second lift versus the option to achieve maximum production rate since the beginning of Lift1. In addition, the decision will consider financial investment metrics like net present value and internal rate of return. This methodology is demonstrated with a real case to show the potential impact on the value of the project.

Keywords: strategic mine planning, block cave, panel cave, simulation, financial

References:
CFI Education Inc. 2022, viewed 5 July 2022, corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/valuation/net-present-value-npv
Dassault Systèmes 2020, Introduction to Isight, internal learning module.
Dassault Systèmes 2022, Optimizing Engineering Methods with Isight, internal learning module
Geovia 2016, Footprint Finder Documentation v2.
Hall, B 2017, Cut-off Grades and Optimising the Strategic Mine Plan, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne.
Hocking, RJ, Mooney, AJ & McFadyen, L 2020, ‘Hill of value financial metrics used to optimise the Carrapateena project’, in R Castro, F Báez & K Suzuki (eds), MassMin 2020: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining, University of Chile, Santiago, pp. 1039–1047, doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2063_77
Laubscher, DA 1994, ‘Cave mining: the state of the art’, Journal of South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 94, no. 10, pp. 279–293.
Lovejoy, C 2012, ‘Keeping up with caving’, Mining Magazine, vol. 6, pp. 46–64.
Ovalle, A 2014, ‘Optimizing hill of value for block caving’, in R Castro (ed), Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving, University of Chile, Santiago, pp. 442–448.
Villa, D 2014, ‘Mine sequence optimization for block caving using concept of ‘best and worst case’’, in R Castro (ed), Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving, University of Chile, Santiago, pp. 426–436.




© Copyright 2022, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au