Authors: Darlington, B; Vallati, O; Young, P

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2205_11

Cite As:
Darlington, B, Vallati, O & Young, P 2022, 'Performance investigation of the newly developed X-Plate', in Y Potvin (ed.), Caving 2022: Fifth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 191-200, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2205_11

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
The decreasing availability of surface and shallow orebodies has driven an increase in the need for deep mining methods. One such method is cave mining, which has many advantages over other mining methods; however, these mines require a higher grade of ground support. Additionally, as a cave mine’s production progresses, excavations are exposed to an increased likelihood of seismic events, which further emphasises the need for an effective ground support system design. When designing ground support systems for cave mining, the rock plate plays an important role, particularly when considering dynamic ground support selection. In block caving mining operations, a rock plate that can withstand the stresses developed by the caving method is essential to ensure safety in the mine and access to drawpoints. Inappropriately selected rock-plates can collapse and push off the rockbolt head when exposed to high strata loads leaving the excavation not properly supported. Recent years has seen a growth in testing methods to quantify the performance of new ground support components, allowing ground support suppliers to deliver products meeting the needs of high stress cave mining conditions. Laboratory dynamic testing apparatuses have provided the opportunity to quantify and qualify the performance of dynamic ground support elements, both as a system and as individual elements. In order to improve product validation capabilities, and to better represent the loading scenarios experienced within caving mines, Sandvik developed a new laboratory dynamic test method that will be presented in this paper. This new test method provides dynamic loading conditions in a controlled laboratory setting, which compliments Sandvik’s in situ dynamic test rig. The new laboratory dynamic test apparatus was utilised in the development of a new dynamic rock plate, to better complement the consistent dynamic performance of the MDX bolt. The new rock plate, the X-Plate, was developed to optimise material, dynamic energy capacity and subsequentially static compression capacity. When compared to the existing Sandvik rock plate, the X-Plate showed improvements of more than 54% in dynamic capacity and 22% in static capacity. In addition to the performance improvements of the X-Plate, a material reduction has resulted in a sustainability gain of an estimated 1,300 t CO2 per year.

Keywords: dynamic ground support, rock plate, bearing plate, dynamic testing, lab testing, sustainability

References:
ASTM International 2019, Standard Specification for Roof and Rock Bolts and Accessories (ASTM F432–19), ASTM International, West Conshohocken.
Darlington, B, Rataj, M, Balog, G & Barnett, D 2018, ‘Development of the MDX bolt and in-situ dynamic testing at Telfer Gold Mine’, in C Li, L Xing & ZX Zhang (eds), Proceeding of the 3rd International Conference on Rock Dynamics and Applications (RocDyn3), CRC Press, pp. 403–408.
Fairhurst, C 2017, ‘Some Challenges of Deep Mining’, Engineering, vol. 3, iss. 4, pp. 527–537.
Hadjigeorgiou, J & Potvin, Y 2008, ‘Overview of Dynamic testing of Ground Support’, in Y Potvin (ed), Proceedings of the 4th International Seminar on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 349–371.
Li, C & Doucet, C 2011, ‘Performance of D-Bolts under dynamic loading’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 45, pp. 193–204. 10.1007/s00603–011–0202–1.
Li, C, Hadjigeorgiou, J, Mikula, P, Knox, G, Darlington, B, Royer, R, Pytlik, A & Hosp, M 2021, ‘Performance of identical rockbolts tested on four dynamic testing rigs employing the direct impact method’, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 13, iss. 4, pp. 745–754.
Mikula, P & Brown, B 2018, ‘The need for additional dynamic testing methods for ground support elements’, in C Li, L Xing & ZX Zhang (eds), Proceeding of the 3rd International Conference on Rock Dynamics and Applications (RocDyn-3), CRC Press, pp. 425–432.
Player, J & Villaescusa, E 2004, ‘Dynamic testing of rock reinforcement using the momentum transfer concept’, in E Villaescusa
& Y Potvin (eds), Fifth International Symposium on Ground Support and reinforcement, Perth, 2004.
Shekhar, G, Gustafson, A, Hersinger, A, Jonsson, K & Schunnesson, H 2019, ‘Development of a model for economic control of loading in sublevel caving mines’, Mining Technology, vol. 128, iss. 2, pp. 118–128.
Vallati, O, Weaver, S & Halling, E 2020, ‘Dynamic testing of ground support: a comparison between in situ and laboratory testing’, Paper presented at the ISRM International Symposium – EUROCK 2020, physical event not held, June 2020.
Villaescusa, E, Thompson, AG & Player, J 2008, ‘Dynamic Testing of Rock Reinforcement Systems’, in J Hadjigeorgiou & M Hudyma (eds), Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Civil Engineering Construction, Cape Town.
Villaescusa, E, Thompson, A & Player, J 2013, ‘Dynamic testing of large scale fibrecrete panels’, in Y Potvin & B Brady (eds), Ground Support 2013: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Underground Construction, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 197–206, ‌_Villaescusa.




© Copyright 2022, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au