Authors: Mariager, S; Zhang, Q; Eustace, C; Hegarty-Cremer, S; Nguyen, K

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2205_21

Cite As:
Mariager, S, Zhang, Q, Eustace, C, Hegarty-Cremer, S & Nguyen, K 2022, 'A simulation comparison of operating strategies for electrified block cave mines', in Y Potvin (ed.), Caving 2022: Fifth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 315-330, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2205_21

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Block cave mining is a mining method aimed at achieving a high tonnage output from a single production level. Interactions between production loaders and consequent cycle delays can constrain overall production level performance. Together with access restrictions associated with the control of caving progression and secondary break requirements, these constraints can prevent block cave mines from reaching throughput targets. Careful layout design and development of operating strategies for the production level are critical for minimising equipment interactions and building an optimised block cave operation. In striving for a net zero emissions mining operation, many companies are actively investigating the option of electrification of their mining fleet. This adds another dimension to design considerations and creates new possibilities for block cave designs and operating strategies. The potential impacts for charging of battery electric vehicles requires consideration and ventilation limits on the practical number of production loaders are reduced, giving rise to different design solutions. This paper explores the capability of a number of alternative production level operating strategies for the Carrapateena mine, which an OZ Minerals owned, South Australian copper-gold mine, ramping up to a rate of 12 Mtpa from 2029 utilising the block cave mining method. A comparison of the performance characteristics for each alternative is assessed using a detailed simulation model of the block cave operations. Relationships betweenfleet size and production level throughput are developed for each alternative operational strategy to demonstrate relative performance over a target throughput range for the mine. The assessment demonstrates how alternative operating strategies can be used to alleviate production level bottlenecks and improve output for block cave mining operations. Outcomes from the case study are broadly applicable to other block cave operations, particularly those that will move to, or are being designed as an electric mining operation.

Keywords: simulation, electrification, decarbonisation

References:
Castro, R & Cuello, D 2018, 'Hang-up analysis and modelling for Cadia East PC1-S1 and PC2-S1', in Y Potvin & J Jakubec (eds), Caving 2018: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 233-246,
Eustace, C, Lagace, D & Bobbermen, L 2020, ‘Simulation capacity analysis for the Carrapateena block cave’, in K-H Bae, B Feng, S Kim, S Lazarova-Molnar, Z Zheng, T Roeder, and R Thiesing, (eds), Proceedings of the 2020 Winter Simulation Conference.
Hronsky, D, Mariager, S, Donaldson, S, Bobbermen, L & Eustace, C 2020, ‘Simulation modelling of Carrapateena Sub Level Cave production level performance’, in R Castro, F Báez & K Suzuki (eds), MassMin 2020: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining, University of Chile, Santiago, pp. 658–667,
/2063_44
Morrison, DM & Labrecque, PO 2020, ‘High-capacity production systems for Block Caving mines’, in R Castro, F Báez & K Suzuki (eds), MassMin 2020: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining, University of Chile, Santiago, pp. 703–715.
OZ Minerals 2022, OZ Minerals 2021 Annual and Sustainability Report, OZ Minerals, Adelaide.
Shelswell, KJ, Labrecque, PO & Morrison, DM 2018, ‘Increasing productive capacity in block caving mines’, in Y Potvin & J Jakubec (eds), Caving 2018: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 107–118,
Vargas, E, Morales, N & Emery, X 2015, ‘Footprint and economic envelope calculation for block/panel caving mines under geological uncertainty’, in J-A Ardito, J Beniscelli, M Goycoolea, M Henríquez, E Moreno, S Rojas & F Villegas (eds), Proceedings of the Fourth International Seminar on Mine Planning.




© Copyright 2022, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au