Authors: Webster, S; Snyman, L; Francois, N; Saadatfar, M

Open access courtesy of:


Cite As:
Webster, S, Snyman, L, Francois, N & Saadatfar, M 2022, 'X-ray computer tomography and ground conditions at Northparkes cave edges to further the understanding of the caving mechanisms of strain and hydraulic conductivity', in Y Potvin (ed.), Caving 2022: Fifth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 635-650,

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero

It is generally understood that rock mass strain increases from the intact, undisturbed zone towards a block cave edge damaged region and into the mobilised zone. The ability to observe this underground is restricted by a lack of safe observation points. However, from this information, the current understanding of cave growth is commonly described using the Duplancic & Brady (1999) caving model. Here, ground conditions transition from pseudo-continuous intact rock to seismogenic, degraded, and loosened rock, and finally, rock mobilised within the cave. The characteristics of the damaged cave zones are highly variable and impact the ongoing caveability, nearby mining activities and hydraulic conductivity. Numerical models can now model these pieces by coupling the interactions of the cave muck pile particle flow, geomechanical response to caving, and hydrological effects. The relationship between each of the components is non-linear and in terms of the hydrology, more definition is required. To improve the efficacy of the hydrological models, the authors are undertaking an experimental project to better define the relationship between hydrological properties and strain. The first triaxial experiment has been performed on the E26 core coupled with X-ray microcomputer tomography (XCT) imaging throughout the loading stages. The images presented here enable 3D visualisation of the complex failure mechanisms and the relationship between strain, fracture dilation, and fracture connectivity. At the same time, Northparkes has mined adjacent and into historic block caves where the development mines against the existing cave edge and in some instances, exposed the mobile caved zone. This allowed observations of the ground conditions transitioning from the pseudo-continuous intact ground through to the mobilised zone and the failure mechanisms encountered. This paper presents underground observations of the variable failure mechanisms encountered from the cave operations. These observations are reconciled against the geomechanical model results to show how strain presents in the mine. The modelling, failure mechanisms, and experiment imaging are brought together to better illustrate the coupling and non-linear relationship between strain, fracture mechanics, and hydraulic conductivity.

Keywords: failure mechanism, strain, permeability, field observations

Beck, D 2017, Letter Regarding E26L1N Layout, Beck Engineering unpublished report, Beck Engineering, Sydney.
Bieniawski, ZT 1967, ‘Mechanism of brittle fracture of rock: Part I—theory of the fracture process’, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, vol. 4, issue 4, pp. 395–406.
Cnudde, V & Boone, MN 2013, ‘High-resolution X-ray computed tomography in geosciences: a review of the current technology and applications’, Earth-Science Reviews, vol. 123, pp. 1–17.
Duplancic, P & Brady, BH 1999, ‘Characterisation of caving mechanisms by analysis of seismicity and rock stress’, Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Rock Mechanics, vol. 2, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 1049–1053.
Flatten, A, Reusch, F & Beck, D 2016, ‘The application of hydromechanical mine-scale modelling for large block caving operations’, MassMin 2016: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference and Exhibition on Mass Mining, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne, pp. 341–348.
Read, J & Stacey, P 2009, Guidelines for Open Pit Slope Design, CSIRO Publishing, Clayton South.
Ross, I & van As, A 2005, ‘Northparkes mine – design, sudden failure, air blast and hazard management of the E26 Block Cave’, Proceedings of the 9th Underground Operators Conference, Australia, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne, pp. 7–21.
Saadatfar, M, Francois, N, Arad, A, Madadi, M, Cruikshank, R, Alizadeh, M, Sheppard, A, Kingston, A, Limay, A & Senden, T 2012, ‘3D mapping of deformation in an unconsolidated sand: a micro mechanical study’, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Houston.
Talu, S, van As, A, Seloka, W & Henry, R 2010, ‘Lift 2 North extension cave performance’, in Y Potvin (ed.), Caving 2010: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth,
pp. 407–421,
Umar, S 2017, Caving Mechanisms for a Non-Daylighting Orebody, PhD thesis, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå.
Webster, S, Samosir, E & Wyllie, A 2020, ‘Learnings from mining cave extensions at Northparkes Mines and new technology to improve the value of future cave designs’, in R Castro, F Báez & K Suzuki (eds), MassMin 2020: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining, University of Chile, Santiago, pp. 92–102,
Webster, S, Saadatfar, M & Francois, N 2022, Coupled Micro-Computer Tomography and Micromechanical Experiment on the Brittle Failure of Porphyry Sock, unpublished manuscript, The Australian National University, Department of Material Physics.

© Copyright 2022, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries or error reports to