Authors: Pitcher, PA; Hocking, RJ

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2205_56

Cite As:
Pitcher, PA & Hocking, RJ 2022, 'Assessing the risk of a sublevel cave–block cave transition using dynamic decision tree analysis overlain with Monte Carlo analysis', in Y Potvin (ed.), Caving 2022: Fifth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 821-830, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2205_56

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Depleting global copper resources and declining discovery rates are driving a step-change in the copper mining industry as open pit mines transition underground and exploration for new deposits moves deeper. The need to exploit deeper, larger and lower grade copper deposits has resulted in the emergence of a technically challenging underground mass mining method called block caving. To improve shareholder returns, mining companies rising expectations for block cave mines are currently pushing the limits of existing knowledge and positioning larger and deeper projects in uncharted territory from a geotechnical risk and cost perspective. This paper addresses unconsidered geotechnical risks in discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis by introducing Monte Carlo simulation and decision tree analysis into a DCF model for the feasibility stage Carrapateena block cave expansion, currently being advanced by OZ Minerals. As a brownfield block cave development project expected to transition from sublevel caving to block caving, the ability to pivot the production strategy in response to downside risks encountered during block cave development and ramp-up was the focus of this paper. Dynamic modelling of geotechnical uncertainty was conducted to provide insight into how uncertainty can be resolved through time, as management decisions are made in response to uncertain events during the development and ramp-up of a block cave project. A dynamic DCF model was created to help assess the risks around the schedule, including the ramp-up and the undercutting phase of the project, while also using a decision tree to determine the best decision for the project overall. The results from the simulation demonstrated an average recovery of approximately AUD 20 million to the valuation for Carrapateena and increased the minimum incremental net present value to be greater than zero, confirming based on the model assumptions and probability distributions that OZ Minerals should decide to pursue the expansion. An additional simulation, focusing on the value of the decision tree itself, indicated that management decisions could minimise the downside risks of delays by up to 15% on the base NPV, supporting the use of decision trees in DCF analysis.

Keywords: block caving, Monte Carlo analysis, decision tree analysis, mine planning

References:
Buchanan, DL 2016, Metals and Energy Finance Advanced Textbook on the Evaluation of Mineral and Energy Projects, Imperial College Press, London
Gui, P 2013, ‘Mineral project evaluation — dealing with uncertainty and risk’, Mineral Economics: Australian and Global Perspectives, 2nd edn, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne, pp. 145–176.
OZ Minerals Limited 2020, Carrapateena Expansion Creates Significant Value Uplift and Unlocks Long Life Mining Province, ASX announcement, viewed 18 July 2022,
_Carrapateena_Block_Cave_Expansion_PFS.pdf.aspx?Embed=Y
Peter, J 2012, Modelling Uncertainty & Flexibility in the Financial Analysis of a Real Estate Development Project in Switzerland, Zurich, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich.
Ross, IT 2018, ‘Benchmarking and its application for caving projects’, in Y Potvin & J Jakubec (eds), Caving 2018: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 473–486,
Winkelmann, N 2018, ‘Cave mining risks - not necessarily greater, but definitely different’, SRK News, issue 56.
Wypych, M 2011, Probabilitic Asset Valuation Applied to Natural Resource Projects, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby.




© Copyright 2022, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au