Authors: Furlong, J; Anderson, Z

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2205_68

Cite As:
Furlong, J & Anderson, Z 2022, 'Distributed acoustic sensing/distributed strain sensing technology and its applications for block cave progress monitoring, rock mass preconditioning, and imagining', in Y Potvin (ed.), Caving 2022: Fifth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 991-1006, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2205_68

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
The block cave mining method has grown over the last decade due to its technical and economic benefits. One of the challenges that remains is monitoring the rock mass response, cave progress, and surface subsidence throughout the operation. Distributed fibre optic sensing (DFOS) is an advanced technology, however, the mining sector remains underserved by this technology that enables an integrated, real-time and high-resolution platform to monitor microseismicity, fracture network propagation, and strain/deformation all using one run of fibre sensing cable. Distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) interrogators acquire seismic signals along many kilometres of fibre, equivalent to a string of geophones lain end-to-end every metre over its length. DAS enables both active and passive seismic applications and advanced analysis techniques using the same cable and setup. In addition, the DAS system captures low-frequency strain data in real-time indicating fracture network orientation, propagation, and slow strain changes within the rock mass in response to block cave operation. Because of its wide aperture, DAS systems reduce hypocentre uncertainty compared to conventional geophone arrays. Sampling that is both wider and denser allows for additional precision for seismic imaging techniques such as tomography, ambient noise tomography (ANT), or multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW). For example, these methods can be used to analyse subsurface velocity variations associated with rock type and structure, or to measure near-surface velocity changes associated with subsidence. The distributed strain sensing (DSS) interrogator can be integrated into the DAS/fibre system to provide realtime or periodic absolute strain measurement and track rock mass deformation over long periods of time. This paper provides an overview of DAS/DSS technology in applications such as block caving, preconditioning, and vertical seismic profiling (VSP) seismic surveys. It reviews acquisition design, analysis, and demonstrates the technology’s capabilities and limitations in detecting and processing seismic and strain data.

Keywords: distributed fibre optic sensing, distributed acoustic sensing, distributed temperature sensing, distributed strain sensing, multichannel analysis of surface waves, vertical seismic profiles

References:
Baird, AF, Stork, AL, Horne, SA, Naldrett, G, Kendall, J M, Wookey, J, ... & Clarke, A 2020, ‘Characteristics of microseismic data recorded by distributed acoustic sensing systems in anisotropic mediaMicroseismic DAS in anisotropic media’, Geophysics, vol. 85, no. 4, KS139–KS147.
Bellefleur, G, Schetselaar, E, Wade, D & White, D 2018, ‘VSP using distributed acoustic sensing with scatter-enhanced fibre-optic cable at the Cu–Au New Afton porphyry deposits, Canada’, Proceedings of the 2nd EAGE Conference on Geophysics for Mineral Exploration and Mining, European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers, extended abstract Tu 2MIN P05.
Binder, G & Abatchev, Z 2021, ‘Joint microseismic event location with surface geophones and downhole DAS at the FORGE geothermal site’, Proceedings of the First International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Houston, pp. 2001–2005.
Chambers, K 2022, Motion Signal Technologies, What Is DAS And What Is It Measuring?, Motion Signal Technologies, St Newlyn East, viewed April 20, 2022,
Hopkins J, Mateeva, A, Harvey, S, Kiyashchenko, D & Duan, Y 2021, ‘Maturing DAS VSP as an Onshore CCUS monitoring technology at the Quest CCS Facility’, Geoconvention, Calgary, Canada.
Hopkins, M, Rimmelin, R & Landon, A 2018, ‘Leinster cave seismic risk management: a block cave solution’, in Y Potvin & J Jakubec (eds), Caving 2018: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 591–606, 
Hudson, TS, Baird, AF, Kendall, JM, Kufner, SK, Brisbourne, AM, Smith, AM, ... & Clarke A 2021, ‘Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) for natural microseismicity studies: A case study from Antarctica’, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, vol. 126, no. 7, e2020JB021493.
Jin, G & Roy, B 2017, ‘Hydraulic-fracture geometry characterization using low-frequency DAS signal’, The Leading Edge, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 975–980.
Lellouch, A, Lindsey, NJ, Ellsworth, WL & Biondi, BL 2020, ‘Comparison between distributed acoustic sensing and geophones: Downhole microseismic monitoring of the FORGE geothermal experiment’, Seismological Society of America, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 3256–3268.
Lett, J 2022, ‘The role of pre-conditioning in mitigating seismic hazards – an innovative method for future caving operations’, Proceedings of RaSiM 10, Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, Englewood.
Martinsson, J 2022, ‘Improved analysis in mXrap using BEMIS data – how to leverage the full potential of your measurement system’, course notes, mXrap User Case Studies for Mines Seminar, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth.
Miah, K & Potter, DK 2017, ‘A review of hybrid fiber-optic distributed simultaneous vibration and temperature sensing technology and its geophysical applications’, Sensors, vol. 17, no. 11.
Monsberger, CM & Lienhart, W 2021, ‘Distributed fiber optic shape sensing along shotcrete tunnel linings: Methodology, field applications, and monitoring results’, Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 337–350.
Parker, T, Shatalin, S & Farhadiroushan, M 2014, ‘Distributed acoustic sensing – a new tool for seismic applications’, First Break, vol. 32, no. 2.
Riedel, M, Cosma, C, Enescu, N, Koivisto, E, Komminaho, K, Vaittinen, K & Malinowski, M 2018, ‘Underground vertical seismic profiling with conventional and fiber-optic systems for exploration in the Kylylahti Polymetallic Mine, Eastern Finland, Minerals, vol. 8, no. 11.
Sainsbury, B 2012, A Model for Cave Propagation and Subsidence Assessment in Jointed Rock Masses, PhD thesis, UNSW Sydney, Kensington.
Törnman, W & Martinsson, J 2020, ‘Reliable automatic processing of seismic events: solving the Swiss cheese problem’, in J Wesseloo (ed.), UMT 2020: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Underground Mining Technology, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 155–172,
Vallejos, JA & McKinnon, SM 2009, ‘Re-entry protocols for seismically active mines using statistical analysis of aftershock sequences’, in M Diederichs & G Grasselli (eds), RockEng09: Proceedings of the 20th Canadian Rock Mechanics Symposium.
Wu, Y, Richter, P, Hull, R & Farhadiroushan, M 2020, ‘Hydraulic frac-hit corridor (FHC) monitoring and analysis with high-resolution distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) and far-field strain (FFS) measurements’, First Break, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 65–70.
Zhang, CC, Shi, B, Zhang, S, Gu, K, Liu, SP, Gong, XL & Wei, GQ 2021, ‘Microanchored borehole fiber optics allows strain profiling of the shallow subsurface’, Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–12.




© Copyright 2022, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au