DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2205_69
Cite As:
Jones, TH & Saiang, D 2022, 'Empirical damage prediction in sublevel cave crosscuts at the Malmberget mine', in Y Potvin (ed.),
Caving 2022: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1007-1018,
https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2205_69
Abstract:
Building on the empirical research completed in the footwall contact zone of LKAB’s Malmberget mine, a method has been developed for predicting damage in the crosscut entries of the mine layout. Threedimensional stress measurements combined with analyses of measured and observed damage in the crosscuts have allowed new interpretations of the crosscut performance. Stress analysis focused on the relative differential stresses measured in the area of interest. These stress changes were then linked directly to observed changes in the entry condition according to the Entry Condition Rating (ECR) system, a damage mapping system developed for the mine. A bilinear model was used to describe the entry condition rate of change such that the peak measured differential stress corresponds to increased degradation rates. These bilinear degradation rate trends are shown to be directly related to the geotechnical qualities of the rock using the Geologic Strength Index (GSI) of the monitored locations, irrespective of lithology. The final step was to develop an empirical model that allows prediction of a crosscut’s future ECR based on changes in the relative differential stress and the GSI of the crosscut. In combination with simple numerical modelling tools the model can be used to predict ahead of time when additional reinforcement will be necessary.
Keywords: differential stress, damage, condition ratings, Geologic Strength Index
References:
Bergman, S, Kübler, L & Martinsson, O 2001, ‘Description of regional geological and geophysical maps of northern Norrbotten county (east of the Caledonian orogen)’, Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, Östervåla.
Duan, W, Wesseloo, J & Potvin, Y 2015, ‘Evaluation of the adjusted rockburst damage potential method for dynamic ground support selection in extreme rockburst conditions’, in Y Potvin (ed.), Design Methods 2015: Proceedings of the International Seminar on Design Methods in Underground Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 399–418,
Feng, X, Zhao, J, Wang, Z, Yang, C, Han, Q & Zheng, Z 2021, ‘Effects of high differential stress and mineral properties on deformation and failure mechanism of hard rocks’, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 411–426.
Jones, T, Nordlund, E & Wettainen, T 2019, ‘Mining-induced deformation in the Malmberget mine’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 52, pp. 1903–1916,
–018–1716–6.
Jones, T & Saiang, D 2022a, Report 209: Design Methods for Variable-Stress, Variable-Geology Environments, Stiftelsen Bergteknisk Forskning, Stockholm.
Jones, T & Saiang, D 2022b, ‘Empirical damage prediction in sublevel cave crosscuts at the Malmberget mine’, in: Y Potvin (ed.), Caving 2022: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1001–1012.
Kaiser, PK, Tannant, DD, McCreath, DR & Jesenak, P 1992, ‘Rockburst damage assessment procedure’, in PK Kaiser & DR McCreath (eds), Rock Support in Mining and Underground Construction, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam.
Lawson, H & Zahl, E, 2012, ‘Ground Condition Mapping: A Case Study’, paper presented at SME Annual Meeting and Exhibit, Seattle, 19–22 February, Preprint number 12–122 6.
Mikula, P & Gebremedhin, B 2017, ‘Empirical selection of ground support for dynamic conditions using charting of support performance at Hamlet mine’, in J Wesseloo (ed.), Deep Mining 2017: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 625–636,
/ACG_rep/1704_42_Mikula