Authors: Savage, E; Jordan, L; Hartman, W

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2205_80

Cite As:
Savage, E, Jordan, L & Hartman, W 2022, 'The planning of a cave reorientation at the Ernest Henry sublevel cave mine ', in Y Potvin (ed.), Caving 2022: Fifth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1161-1170, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2205_80

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
The Ernest Henry Operation (EHO) in Queensland (Australia) is developed to a depth of just over 1 km, and current active production cave levels have reached a depth of 800 m, with a pre-feasibility study underway to assess a mine extension to around 1,375 m below surface. The EHO main cave orebody is changing shape with depth, narrowing from east to west and elongating north to south. The narrowing and elongation of the orebody is resulting in the current longitudinal mining layout to consist of a reduced number of ore drives at an extended length, impacting productivity and mining associated risks. The extended ore drives (>400 m) pose a secondary ventilation challenge, ground instability risks in maintaining access crossing a major geological structure and excessive cave loader tramming distances. The intersection of new major geological structures within the cave footprint significantly increases potential unravelling and seismic risk, particularly with the start-ups of new levels and their associated step-outs. These ground related issues are expected to be challenging with depth and therefore necessitate a change in cave orientation. Altering the mine design, to reduce these challenges, is considered an optimal way to de-risk the mine plan at depth. This paper outlines key items within the study process, some mining associated challenges and risks, a decision-making and planning process in rotating the cave layout, proposed control measures to ensure local and regional stability. Thus, the paper outlines the requirements for creating an environment where risk aversion will be the state of play in an increasingly challenging environment.

Keywords: mine planning, caving, sublevel cave, reorientation, cave flow, seismicity, stability

References:
Beck Engineering 2021, EHM2021NOV03 HYBRID VS OLD V2, Beck Engineering, Brisbane.
Copper Resource Enginneering 2021, Ernest Henry Main Cave Rotation Study Findings and Recommendations, Glencore, Brisbane.
Ernest Henry Operation 2021, EHO Ground Control Management Plan, Ernest Henry Operation, Cloncurry.
Kaiser, P, Diederichs, M, Martin, C, Sharp, J & Steiner, W 2000, ‘Underground works in hard rock tunnelling and mining’, GeoEng 2000, Technomic Publications Co., Melbourne pp. 841–926.
Shiels, A 2021, EHM Geotech Cave Rotation, Glencore, Brisbane
Stephens, S 2021, Fault-AB model update, November 2021, Ernest Henry Operations, Cloncurry.




© Copyright 2022, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au