DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2205_86
Cite As:
Ali, Z & Karakus, M 2022, 'Experimental investigation of hydraulic fracturing in granite under hydrostatic stress conditions', in Y Potvin (ed.),
Caving 2022: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1241-1252,
https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2205_86
Abstract:
Cave propagation and rock mass fragmentation are the major challenges in block cave mining. In deep underground mines where the rock mass is stronger and stresses are higher, an artificial weakening is required. Hydraulic fracturing (HF) has evolved as one of the most preferred methods of preconditioning in block cave mining as it provides better control of fracture geometry and orientation and helps in the dissipation of the stored excess strain energy. The breakdown pressure, fracture propagation and orientation are some of the important parameters which govern the success of HF operations. In order to understand these parameters and to collect reliable data for numerical investigations, laboratoryscale HF experiments were performed on cylindrical samples of Adelaide black granite under various hydrostatic stress conditions. A borehole of 8 mm in diameter and 63.5 mm in length was pressurised using dyed water until the specimen failed under four different confining pressures. The failure process was monitored using an acoustic emission monitoring system with several piezoelectric sensors in order to characterise the fracturing process during the experiments. A positive linear relationship was observed between the breakdown pressure and the hydrostatic stresses which is in line with the theoretical results. However, it was observed that the rock tensile strengths found using Brazilian disc tests are slightly lower than the breakdown strengths.
Keywords: block caving, preconditioning, de-stressing, hydraulic fracturing, acoustic emission
References:
Adam, KS, Nouné SM, Chaoshui Xu 2017, ‘Fracture mechanics approximation to predict the breakdown pressure using the theory of critical distances’, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, vol. 95, pp.48–61.
Ali, Z, Karakus, M, Nguyen, GD & Amrouch, K 2022, ‘Application of full-field strain measurement to study Kaiser effect in granite under indirect tensile loading’, Proceedings of the 56th US Rock mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, American Rock Mechanics Association, Alexandria.
Brady, BHG & Brown, ET 1999, Rock Mechanics: For Underground Mining, 2nd edn, Springer, Dordrecht.
Bruning, T, Karakus, M, Nguyen, GD, Akdag, S & Goodchild, D 2018, ‘Influence of deviatoric stress on rock burst occurrence: An experimental study’, International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 763–766.
Brzovic, A, Rogers S, Webb, G, Hurtado, JP, Marin, N, Schachter, P & Baraona, K 2015, ‘Discrete fracture network modelling to quantify rock mass pre-conditioning at the El Teniente Mine, Chile’, Mining Technology, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 163–177.
Bunger, A, Zhang, X & Jeffrey, RG 2011, ‘Parameters effecting the interaction among closely spaced hydraulic fractures’, paper presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, Woodland, Texas, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Chacon, E, Jeffrey, R, van AA 2004, ‘Hydraulic fracturing used to precondition ore and reduce fragment size for block caving’, Proceedings of MassMin 2004, Instituto de Ingenieros de Chile, Santiago, pp. 529–534.
Clark, J B 1949, ‘A hydraulic process for increasing the productivity of wells’, Journal of Petroleum Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 2180–2207.
Catalan, A, Onederra, I & Chitombo, G 2017a, ‘Evaluation of intensive preconditioning in block and panel caving – Part I, quantifying the effect on intact rock’, Mining Technology, pp. 1–12.
Haimson, BC & Fairhurst, C 1967, ‘Initiation and extension of hydraulic fractures in rocks’, Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, SPE 1710-PA.
He, Q, Suorineni, FT & Oh, J 2016a, ‘Review of hydraulic fracturing for preconditioning in cave mining’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 4893–4910.
Jeffrey, R, Zhang, X & Chen, Z 2017, ‘Hydraulic fracture growth in naturally fractured rock Porous Rock’, Fracture Mechanics, pp. 93–116.
Juncal, A, Ivars, D, Brzovic, A & Vallejos, J 2014, ‘Simulating the effect of preconditioning in primary fragmentation: structures in and on rock masses, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, pp. 661–665.
Karakus, M 2014, ‘Quantifying the discrepancy in preloads estimated by acoustic emission and deformation rate analysis’, paper presented at the International Society of Rock Mechanics, European Rock Mechanics Symposium, Vigo, Spain.
Katsaga, T, Riahi A, DeGagne, DO, Valley, B & Damjanac, B 2015, ‘Hydraulic fracturing operations in mining: conceptual approach and DFN modelling example’, Mining Technology, vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 255–266.
Mehrgini, B, Memarian, H, Memarian, H, Goodarzi B, Eshraghi, H, Ghavidel, A, Hassanzade, M & Niknejad, M 2016, ‘Comparing laboratory hydraulic fracturing and Brazilian test tensile strengths’, paper presented at the 50th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Houston, Texas, USA.
Mills, K 2004, ‘Remote high resolution stress change monitoring for hydraulic fractures’, in A Karzulovic & MA Alfaro (eds), Proceedings of MassMin 2004, Instituto de Ingenieros de Chile, Santiago, pp. 529–534.
Molenda, M, Brenne, S & Alber, M 2013, Effective and Sustainable Hydraulic Fracturing, Intech Open Limited.
Stoeckhert, F, Brenne, S, Molenda, M & Alber, M 2014, ‘Hydraulic fracturing – laboratory experiments, acoustic emissions, and fracture mechanics’, Geomechanik Kolloquium, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, pp. 79–105.
Zhai, C, Li, M, Sun, C, Zhang, J, Yang, W & Li, Q 2012, ‘Guiding-controlling technology of coal seam hydraulic fracturing fractures extension’, International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 831–836.
Zhang, Y, Hu, Z, Lei, H, Bai, L, Lei, Z & Zhang, Q 2019, ‘An experimental investigation into the characteristics of hydraulic fracturing and fracture permeability after hydraulic fracturing in granite’, Renewable Energy, vol. 140, pp. 615–624.