Authors: Sanders, J; Fitzpatrick, A

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2215_51

Cite As:
Sanders, J & Fitzpatrick, A 2022, 'A Peruvian case study: optimising mine planning through mine closure decision assessment', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2022: 15th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 713-724, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2215_51

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Mine planning sets the goals and decisions required for the extraction of mined minerals at desired quality and quantities. Mine planning involves short-term and long-term decisions to facilitate implementation of strategic business objectives. However, mine planning business value drivers may not be aligned with closure strategies and obligations, which results in closure risks/opportunities not being managed. This makes it difficult to manage closure costs over time, particularly relating to potential long-term water quality impacts associated with mine rock and tailings management. Confirming that business value drivers align with closure objectives and the decision assessment process captures closure risks and opportunities is crucial to reduce potential for long-term liabilities and costs. Establishing a closure strategic plan supported by clear objectives and success criteria is important as it helps align mine planning stakeholders. While this is not a new concept, implementation of closure strategies into mine planning varies across the industry. This paper discusses a recent case study at a mine in Peru, in which a set of mine closure ‘strategic pillars’, decision-analysis tools, and a supporting integrated water quality model (WQM) were used to inform shortterm and long-term mine planning. The WQM allows for potential future water quality impacts of mine plan options to be quantified, ranked, and the associated long-term mitigation costs considered within life of asset costs. This paper details the innovative approach taken to integrate decision analysis, integrated WQM and closure costing tools to inform mine planning and life of asset costs. The motivation for developing this paper is due to an observed need to increase dialogue on this topic, with a broader vision to improve the mining industry’s reputation in closure outcomes and maintaining social trust.

Keywords: mine planning, decision assessment, closure strategy, water quality model

References:
Earth Systems & Okane 2020, Rock Placement Strategies to Enhance Operational and Closure Performance of Mine Rock Stockpiles, Phase 1 Work Program – Review, Assessment & Summary of Improved Construction Methods, prepared for the International Network for Acid Prevention (INAP), 13 January 2020,
Government of Canada 2016, Guidelines for the Assessment of Alternatives for Mine Waste Disposal,
ICMM 2017, Water Stewardship: Position Statement,
ICMM 2020, Closure Maturity Framework, London.
ICMM 2019, Integrated Mine Closure: Good Practice Guide, 2nd edn,
/pdfs/environmental-stewardship/2019/guidance_integrated-mine-closure.pdf
International Organization for Standardization 2021, ISO-DIS-21795-2 ‘DRAFT International Standard – ‘Part 2: Guidance’, Geneva.
Sanders, J Wendtman, M & Sexton, A 2018, ‘Change management over the life of mine: challenges and opportunities for closure residual risks’, in C Drebenstedt, F von Bismarck, AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Mine Closure, Technical University Bergakademie Freiberg, Freiberg, pp. 315–329.




© Copyright 2022, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au