Authors: Harrison, FA; Kiejda, M

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2215_54

Cite As:
Harrison, FA & Kiejda, M 2022, 'Realising rehabilitation of legacy mine areas as an opportunity under an environmental, social and governance framework', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2022: 15th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 753-766, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2215_54

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
The most elementary goal of mine closure is to minimise the environmental impact of the operations and reduce future financial impact to the company’s shareholders. Many modern mines have detailed mine closure plans for current approved mine operations, gaining the support from the shareholders and, in turn, increasing the value of the company. In recent years, we have seen mines being decommissioned and rehabilitated to land uses from pre-mine natural states through to future energy hubs. An emerging issue pertaining to closure planning is the identification and management of legacy areas where mining or exploration activities have ceased but rehabilitation has not occurred. Given the age of these some of these unclosed sites, many openings have not been sealed, forgotten, or lost. These sites pose a risk to the public safety and reduce the value of the land for future sales. The current Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) standards require the disclosure of environmental and social impacts to the decommissioning and rehabilitation of mines. These environmental, social and governance (ESG) standards focus on the financial materiality of issues pertaining to mine closure. Banks and investors look to these standards to guide their investment decisions. Using four Australian case studies, we explore how an ESG report using the SASB Standards can be improved when a legacy area is rehabilitated or closed. This can lead to favourable results for the company when it comes to refinancing or divesting an asset due to more investor interest as the materiality of the legacy area is better defined. In addition, shifting legacy areas from areas of risk on a company’s portfolio to potential opportunities to drive better ESG performance has the potential to realise increased corporate financial performance and increased valuation by investors.

Keywords: legacy areas, NSW, ESG, SASB Standards, rehabilitation, decommissioning, sustainability, closure

References:
Bergman, MS, Deckelbaum, AJ & Karp, BS 2020, Introduction to ESG, Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, viewed 1 May 2022,
BlackRock 2022, What is Sustainable Investing?, viewed 5 May 2022,
Bloomberg Professional Services 2021, ESG Assets May Hit $53 Trillion by 2025, A Third of Global AUM, viewed 5 May 2022,
Camm, TW & Girard-Dwyer, J 2005, Economic Consequence of Mining Injuries, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Spokane Research Laboratory, 315E Montgomery Avenue, Spokane.
Department of Planning and Environment 2022, Major Projects, viewed 25 July 2022,
Eccles, RG & Mirchandani, B 2022, ‘We need universal ESG accounting standards’, Harvard Business Review, viewed 5 May 2022,
Friede, G, Busch, T & Bassen, A 2015, ‘ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies’, Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, vol. 5, issue 4, pp. 210–233.
Glencore 2021, Coal Mine Rehabilitation, 2021 update, viewed 25 July,
GRI & SASB 2021, A Practical Guide to Sustainability Reporting Using GRI and SASB Standards, viewed 29 July 2022,
International Council on Mining & Metals 2020, Integrated Mine Closure, Good Practice Guide, 2nd edn, ICMM, London.
IFRS 2022, ISSB Communicates Plans to Build on SASB’s Industry-Based Standards and Leverage SASB’s Industry-Based Approach to Standards Development, viewed 5 May 2022,
International Commission on Large Dams 2011, Sustainable Design and Post-Closure Performance of Tailings Dam, International Commission on Large Dams, Paris.
International Network for Acid Prevention 2022, Acid and Metalliferous Drainage, viewed 25 July 2022,
Kumar, RN & McCullough, CD 2009, ‘Water resources in Australian mine pit lakes’, Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, Section A: Mining Technology, vol. 118, issue 3–4.
Laurence, DC 2006, Why Do Mines Close?, PhD thesis, University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Mackenzie 2022, Subsidence Features - What is ‘Safe’?, Proceedings of the 11th Triennial Conference, Mine Subsidence Technological Society, Pokolbin, pp. 353–362.
McCombe, Fitzgerald and Chalmers, 2022, ‘Implementation of the ‘Q&A responses to ‘Towards Sustainable Mining’ ESG performance system’’, Online webinar hosted by Minerals Council of Australia 27 April 2022
McKinsey Sustainability 2020, The ESG Premium: New Perspectives on Value and Performance, viewed 28 July 2022,
Minerals Council of Australia 2022, Towards Sustainable Mining: Taking ESG accountability to a New Level, Minerals Council of Australia , Canberra, viewed 10 May 2022,
Mining Legacies, 2022, ‘Images and impacts from mining in Australia, NSW’ viewed 12 May 2022,
NSW Government 1992, Mining Act 1992, Sydney.
NSW Government 2016, Mining Regulation 2016, Sydney.
NSW Government 2011, Work Health and Safety Act 2011, Sydney.
NSW Government 2013, Work Health and Safety (Mines and Petroleum Sites) Act 2013, Sydney.
NSW Government 2014, Work Health and Safety (Mines and Petroleum Sites) Regulation 2014, Sydney.
NSW Government 2022, ‘Legacy Mines Program’, viewed 10 May 2022,
SASB Standards Board 2021, Metals & Mining Sustainability Accounting Standard, viewed 30 May 2022,
The Advertiser 2014, Coober Pedy Man, 41, Found Dead After Falling Down Disused Mine Shaft While Searching for Opals, viewed 15 May 2022,
Value Reporting Foundation 2022b, SASB Standards Overview, viewed 10 May 2022,




© Copyright 2022, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au