Authors: Shaw, J; Pedlar-Hobbs, R; Chubb, D

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2215_58

Cite As:
Shaw, J, Pedlar-Hobbs, R & Chubb, D 2022, 'The role of key performance indicators throughout the mine life in achieving closure objectives', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2022: 15th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 803-812, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2215_58

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
At the industry level, there is recognition that the principle of designing and operating for closure is necessary to achieve successful and sustainable post-mining outcomes. Despite recognising the benefits of applying these principles, many mine operators struggle with the apparently conflicting objectives of run-of-mine profitability and life-of-mine costs and liabilities. This paper makes the following interrelated arguments from our experience. Closure efforts can be made significantly more effective (and ultimately less expensive) if closure considerations are included in the day-to-day operations of a mine. Closure is currently not being adequately considered and embedded into all stages of the mine lifecycle due to a reluctance to accept present expenditures to reduce long-term costs. An integrated and progressive approach to closure is not merely about the temporal redistribution of costs; rather, there are real, immediate and long-term benefits to incorporating closure into day-to-day activities that need to be considered alongside other financial calculations. Key performance indicators (KPIs) can be a useful tool to facilitate the cultural and organisational change required to shift towards a more embedded, integrated, progressive, and ultimately effective closure process. Incorporating KPIs earlier in the mine lifecycle will offer the greatest benefit, and KPIs developed as part of a closure execution project can also increase the likelihood of achieving positive closure outcomes. After elucidating these arguments and providing examples of the benefits of KPIs as a vehicle for organisational change, this paper suggests some areas to consider for KPIs for companies looking to effectively integrate progressive closure considerations into their broader mine plans.

References:
Anglo American 2013, Ensuring a Lasting Legacy, viewed 10 June 2022,
Berthelot, DS, Place-Hoskie, D, Willems, D & Black, K 2019, 'Elliot Lake, Ontario uranium mines a legacy perpetual care case study', in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2019: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1151-1164,
BHP 2021, Planning the Closure of Assets, viewed 10 June 2022,
Churr, A, McNulty, C & Posnik, S 2014, ‘Reducing closure costs and risks: a cost-benefit analysis of mining and rehabilitation methods’, in IM Weiersbye, AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Mine Closure, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
Clark, A and Clark, JC 2005, An International Overview of Legal Frameworks for Mine Closure, Energy and Biodiversity Initiative, viewed 10 June 2022,
Commonwealth of Australia 2006, Mine Closure and Completion, viewed 10 June 2022,
Hockley, DE & Hockley, LC 2015, ‘Some histories of mien closure, the idea’, in AB Fourie, M Tibbett, L Sawatsky & D van Zyl (eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Mine Closure, InfoMine, Vancouver.
Holmes, R, Quinn, M & Thorpe, MB 2015, ‘A Framework for standardized, performance-based completion criteria for mine closure and mine site relinquishment’, in AB Fourie, M Tibbett, L Sawatsky & D van Zyl (eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Mine Closure, InfoMine, Vancouver.
International Council on Mining and Metals 2019, Integrated Mine Closure Good Practice Guide, 2nd edition, International Council on Mining and Metals, London.
Kirkwood, D, McCreath, DR & Peters, TH 1996, Decommissioning of Uranium Mine Tailings Management Areas in the Elliot Lake Area, Report of the Environmental Assessment Panel, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, Vancouver.
Nicholson, RV, Ludgate, I, Clyde, E & Venhuis, M 2012, ‘The successful reclamation of acid generating tailings in the Elliot Lake Uranium District of Canada: a good-news case’, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Acid Rock Drainage, Ottawa.
NSW Government 2021, ‘NSW Government introduces new mining rehabilitation rules’, viewed 10 June 2022, .
Parmenter, D 2015, Key performance indicators: developing, implementing & using winning KPIs, 3rd edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Pearce, L 2021, ‘ERM outlines the true cost of mine closure’, The Northern Miner, February 18, 2021.
Pedlar-Hobbs, R, Ludgate, I & Lanteigne, S 2015, ‘Key factors in developing and implementing a successful mine closure plan – Denison sites 20 years after closure’, in AB Fourie, M Tibbett, L Sawatsky & D van Zyl (eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Mine Closure, InfoMine, Vancouver.
Queensland Government 2021, Guideline Progressive Rehabilitation and Closure Plans (PRC Plans), version 2.00, Department of Environment and Science.
Rio Tinto 2021, Closure, viewed 10 June 2022,
Sochorova, V 2017, Beyond Compliance: Safety Culture, viewed 10 June 2022,
Stevens, R 2021, Current Status of Mine Closure Readiness: Are Governments Prepared?, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Ottawa.
Veltri, A, Pagell, M, Behm, M & Das, A 2007, ‘A data-based evaluation of the relationship between occupational safety and operating performance’, The Journal of SH&E Research, vol. 4, no. 1.
Vivoda, V, Kemp, D & Owen, J 2019, ‘Regulating the social aspects of mine closure in three Australian states’, Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 405–424.




© Copyright 2022, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au