Spain, CS, Gagen, EJ, Nuske, SJ & Purtill, J 2022, 'Exploring biophysical limitations and post-mining native ecosystem rehabilitation outcomes in Queensland', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2022: 15th International Conference on Mine Closure
, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 883-894, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2215_64
In Queensland, Australia, the objective of mine rehabilitation is for land disturbed by mining to attain a ‘stable condition’, which is defined as land that is, safe, stable, non-polluting and able to sustain a post-mining land use (PMLU). Mining companies need to articulate achievable and measurable rehabilitation milestones and milestone criteria to demonstrate progress towards these rehabilitation objectives via Progressive Rehabilitation and Closure (PRC) plans. A commonly proposed PMLU is native ecosystem, though there is not a state-wide definition of ‘native ecosystem’ for the purposes of rehabilitation, and existing rehabilitation milestone criteria for this very broad PMLU vary considerably between sites. It is in this context that the Office of the Queensland Mine Rehabilitation Commissioner is undertaking research to define and understand the drivers for various native ecosystem rehabilitation outcomes and describe best practice with respect to planning for and evaluating the success of native ecosystem PMLUs in Queensland.
In Queensland, rehabilitated ecosystems that develop in highly disturbed landscapes often produce one of the following outcomes: they may be natural (restored to the extent of historic succession trajectory); hybrid (have some but not all characteristics of the natural/historic landscape, and some novel attribute); or novel (a new assemblage of abiotic and biotic attributes resulting in a stable alternative ecological form). This natural–novel paradigm, is a useful tool for evaluating rehabilitation options on mine sites. However, the natural–novel concept is not without controversy or criticism. For example, it raises the question: does accepting ecosystem novelty equate to a ‘lowering of the bar’ with regards to ecosystem rehabilitation goals? Or, conversely, is ecosystem novelty an opportunity for innovative delivery of ecosystem services in otherwise degraded landscapes? In the present work, we extend on the natural-hybrid-novel framework to include substitute natural ecosystems as a rehabilitation outcome that should be considered when biophysical limitations preclude establishment of the pre-mining natural ecosystem. We also articulate the distinction between planned novel ecosystems (i.e. ecosystems designed to deliver beneficial environmental outcomes) and unplanned novel ecosystems (the inadvertent result of rehabilitation attempts when biophysical limitations preclude natural ecosystem establishment) and suggest that these, and hybrid ecosystems, be evaluated in light of the environmental, biological and human-centric ecosystem services they deliver.
Keywords: biophysical limitations, ecosystem services, mining, novel ecosystems, rehabilitation, restoration
Annandale, M, Meadows, J & Erskine, P 2021, ‘Indigenous forest livelihoods and bauxite mining: A case-study from northern Australia’, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 294, no. May, p. 113014,
Aronson, J, Murcia, C, Kattan, GH, Moreno-Mateos, D, Dixon, K & Simberloff, D 2014, ‘The road to confusion is paved with novel ecosystem labels: A reply to Hobbs et al.’, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 646–647,
Australian Government 2016, Leading Practice Sustainable Development Program for the Mining Industry: Mine Rehabilitation, Australian Government.
Boldy, R, Santini, T, Annandale, M, Erskine, PD & Sonter, LJ 2021, ‘Understanding the impacts of mining on ecosystem services through a systematic review’, Extractive Industries and Society, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 457–466,
Brown, GK 2021, Introduction to the Census of the Queensland flora 2021, Department of Environment and Science, Queensland Government.
Clement, S & Standish, RJ 2018, ‘Novel ecosystems: governance and conservation in the age of the Anthropocene’, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 208, pp. 36–45,
Clewell, A & Aronson, J 2013, ‘The SER primer and climate change’, Ecological Management and Restoration, vol. 14, no. 3,
Cole, M, Nussbaumer, Y, Castor, C & Fisher, N 2006, Topsoil Substitutes and Sustainability of Reconstructed Native Forest in the Hunter Valley, ACARP report C12033, Australian Coal Association Research Program.
Costanza, R, de Groot, R, Braat, L, Kubiszewski, I, Fioramonti, L, Sutton, P, Farber, S & Grasso, M 2017, ‘Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go?’, Ecosystem Services, vol. 28, pp. 1–16,
Dale, G, Thomas, E, McCallum, L, Raine, S, Bennett, J & Reardon-Smith, K 2018, Applying risk-based principles of dispersive mine spoil behaviour to facilitate development of cost-effective best management practices, ACARP report C24033, Australian Coal Association Research Program.
Department of Environment and Science 2021, Guideline – Progressive rehabilitation and closure plans (PRC plans), Department of Environment and Science, Queensland Government.
Doley, D & Audet, P 2013, ‘Adopting novel ecosystems as suitable rehabilitation alternatives for former mine sites’, Ecological Processes, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 22,
Doley, D & Audet, P 2016, ‘What part of mining are ecosystems? Defining success for the ‘restoration’ of highly disturbed landscapes’, in Ecological Restoration: Global Challenges, Social Aspects and Environmental Benefits, Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
Doley, D, Audet, P & Mulligan, DR 2012, ‘Examining the Australian context for post-mined land rehabilitation: Reconciling a paradigm for the development of natural and novel ecosystems among post-disturbance landscapes’, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 163, pp. 85–93,
Erskine, PD & Fletcher, AT 2013, ‘Novel ecosystems created by coal mines in central Queensland’s Bowen Basin’, Ecological Processes, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–12,
Everingham, J-A, Rolfe, J, Lechner, AM, Kinnear, S & Akbar, D 2018, ‘A proposal for engaging a stakeholder panel in planning post-mining land uses in Australia’s coal-rich tropical savannahs’, Land Use Policy, vol. 79, pp. 397–406,
Ferguson, K, Cooper, T & Hightower, O 2021, ‘Charting a course toward sustainable post-closure outcomes: learnings from the Pilbara’, Proceedings of the Life of Mine Conference 2021, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne, pp. 127–131.
Gardner, JH & Bell, DT 2007, ‘Bauxite mining restoration by Alcoa World Alumina Australia in Western Australia: social, political, historical, and environmental contexts’, Restoration Ecology, vol. 15, no. SUPPL. 4, pp. 3–10,
Gillespie, M, Glenn, V & Doley, D 2015, ‘Reconciling waste rock rehabilitation goals and practice for a phosphate mine in a semi-arid environment’, Ecological Engineering, vol. 85, pp. 1–12,
Grant, CD 2006, ‘State-and-transition successional model for bauxite mining rehabilitation in the Jarrah forest of Western Australia’, Restoration Ecology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 28–37,
Grant, CD & Koch, J 2007, ‘Decommissioning Western Australia’s First Bauxite Mine: Co-evolving vegetation restoration techniques and targets’, Ecological Management & Restoration, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 92–105,
Gwenzi, W 2021 ‘Rethinking restoration indicators and end-points for post-mining landscapes in light of novel ecosystems’, Geoderma, vol. 387, p. 114944,
Hallett, LM, Standish, RJ, Hulvey, KB, Gardener, MR, Suding, KN, Starzomski, BM, Murphy, SD & Harris, JA 2013, ‘Towards a conceptual framework for novel ecosystems’, Novel Ecosystems,
Hancock, GR, Duque, JM & Willgoose, GR 2019, ‘Geomorphic design and modelling at catchment scale for best mine rehabilitation – The Drayton mine example (New South Wales, Australia)’, Environmental Modelling and Software, vol. 114, no. February 2018, pp. 140–151,
Higgs, E 2017, ‘Novel and designed ecosystems’, Restoration Ecology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 8–13,
Hobbs, RJ, Arico, S, Aronson, J, Baron, JS, Bridgewater, P, Cramer, VA, … Zobel, M 2006, ‘Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order’, Global Ecology and Biogeography, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–7,
Hobbs, RJ, Higgs, E, Hall, CM, Bridgewater, P, Chapin III, FS, Ellis, EC, … Yung, L 2014a, ‘Managing the whole landscape: historical, hybrid, and novel ecosystems’, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 557–564,
Hobbs, RJ, Higgs, E & Harris, JA 2009, ‘Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration’, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 599–605,
Hobbs, RJ, Higgs, ES & Hall, CM 2013a, ‘Defining novel ecosystems’, in RJ Hobbs, ES Higgs & CM Hall (eds.), Novel Ecosystems,
Hobbs, RJ, Higgs, ES & Hall, CM 2013b, ‘Introduction: why novel ecosystems?’, in RJ Hobbs, ES Higgs & CM Hall (eds.), Novel Ecosystems, pp. 3–8,
Hobbs, RJ, Higgs, ES & Harris, JA 2014b, ‘Novel ecosystems: concept or inconvenient reality? A response to Murcia et al.’, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 645–646,
Howard, EJ, Loch, RJ & Vacher, CA 2011, ‘Evolution of landform design concepts’, Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy, Section A: Mining Technology, vol. 120, pp. 112–117,
Humphries, RN & Tibbett, M 2015, ‘Does the concept of novel ecosystems have a place in mine closure & rehabilitation?’, in AB Fourie, M Tibbett, L Sawatsky & D van Zyl (eds.), Mine Closure 2015: Proceedings of the Tenth International conference on Mine Closure, InfoMine Inc., Vancouver.
Keenan, J & Holcombe, S, 2021, ‘Mining as a temporary land use: A global stocktake of post-mining transitions and repurposing’, Extractive Industries and Society, no. May, p. 100924,
Lamb, D, Erskine, PD & Fletcher, A 2015, ‘Widening gap between expectations and practice in Australian minesite rehabilitation’, Ecological Management & Restoration, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 186–195,
Light, A, Thompson, A & Higgs, ES 2013, ‘Valuing Novel Ecosystems’, Novel Ecosystems,
Neldner, V, Butler, DW & Guymer, GP 2019a, Queensland’s Regional Ecosystems: Building a maintaining a biodiversity inventory, planning framework and information system for Queensland, version 2, Queensland Herbarium, Queensland Department of Environment and Science, Brisbane, Queensland.
Neldner, V, Niehus, R, Wilson, B, McDonald, W, Ford, A & Accad, A 2019b, The Vegetation of Queensland, Descriptions of Broad Vegetation Groups, version 4.0, Queensland Herbarium, Department of Environment and Science, Brisbane.
Neldner, V, Wilson, BA, Dilleward, HA, Ryan, TS, Butler, DW, McDonald, WJF, … & Appelman, CN 2022, Methodology for Surveying and Mapping Regional Ecosystems and Vegetation Communities in Queensland, version 6.0, Queensland Herbarium, Department of Environment and Science, Brisbane.
Nichols, OG, Carbon, BA, Colquhoun, IJ, Croton, JT & Murray, NJ 1985, ‘Rehabilitation after bauxite mining in South-Western Australia’, Landscape Planning, vol. 12, pp. 75–92.
Peake, T, Robinson, T, Howe, B & Garnhan, J 2021, Etablishing Self-Sustaining and Recognisable Ecological Mine Rehabilitation, ACARP C27038, Australian Coal Association Research Program, Brisbane.
Perring, MP, Standish, RJ & Hobbs, RJ 2013, ‘Incorporating novelty and novel ecosystems into restoration planning and practice in the 21st century’, Ecological Processes, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 18,
Pietrzykowski, M & Daniels, WL 2014, ‘Estimation of carbon sequestration by pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) ecosystems developed on reforested post-mining sites in Poland on differing mine soil substrates’, Ecological Engineering, vol. 73, pp. 209–218,
Prober, SM, Byrne, M, McLean, EH, Steane, DA, Potts, BM, Vaillancourt, RE & Stock, WD 2015, ‘Climate-adjusted provenancing: a strategy for climate-resilient ecological restoration’, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 3, no. Jun, pp. 1–5,
Queensland Government 1994, Environmental Protection Act 1994, Queensland, Australia.
Queensland Government 2019, Environmental Protection Regulation 2019, Schedule 8A Part 3, Queensland, Australia.
Ross, MRV, Bernhardt, ES, Doyle, MW & Heffernan, JB 2015, ‘Designer ecosystems: incorporating design approaches into applied ecology’, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 419–443,
Ryba, D 2021, ‘Mangoola open cut sustainable mine rehabilitation design – getting the fundamentals right’, Proceedings of Life of Mine Conference 2021, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne, pp. 151–153.
Schwenke, GD, Mulligan, DR & Bell, LC 2000, ‘Soil stripping and replacement for the rehabilitation of bauxite-mined land at Weipa. I. initial changes to soil organic matter and related parameters’, Soil Research, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 345–370.
Standish RJ, Thompson A, Higgs ES, Murphy SD 2013, ‘Concerns about novel ecosystems’, in RJ Hobbs, ES Higgs & CM Hall (eds), Novel Ecosystems, Wiley, Hoboken,
The Minserve Group Pty Ltd 2007, Evaluation of Rehabilitation by Stakeholder Panel, ACARP report C15035, Australian Coal Association Research Program, Brisbane.
Tripathi, N, Singh, RS & Hills, CD 2016, ‘Soil carbon development in rejuvenated Indian coal mine spoil’, Ecological Engineering, vol. 90, pp. 482–490,
Truitt, AM, Granek, EF, Duveneck, MJ, Goldsmith, KA, Jordan, MP & Yazzie, KC 2015, ‘What is novel about novel ecosystems: managing change in an ever-changing world’, Environmental Management, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1217–1226,
Wagner, AM, Larson, DL, DalSoglio, JA, Harris, JA, Labus, P, Rosi-Marshall, EJ & Skrabis, KE 2016, ‘A framework for establishing restoration goals for contaminated ecosystems’, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 264–272,
Young, R, Manero, A, Miller, B, Kragt, ME, Standish, RJ, Jasper, D & Boggs, G 2019, A Framework for Developing Mine-Site Completion Criteria in Western Australia, The Western Australian Biodiversity Science Institute.