Authors: Osgerby, B; Crosbie, J; Davison, N; Vogler, HG; Rohde, TK

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2215_81

Cite As:
Osgerby, B, Crosbie, J, Davison, N, Vogler, HG & Rohde, TK 2022, 'Six months of monitoring of a tailings storage facility barrier cover trial at Rosebery Mine, Tasmania', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2022: 15th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1103-1116, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2215_81

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
The rehabilitation of a potentially acid forming (PAF) tailings storage facility (TSF) to minimise potential contamination is site specific; being a function, among other factors, of TSF construction method, the tailings deposition and storage method used, and climate. Two experimental barrier cover trials have been constructed at the Bobadil TSF at Rosebery Mine in the northwest of Tasmania to inform rehabilitation of the facility at the end of its operation. The primary design objective of the Bobadil TSF barrier cover is to limit rainfall infiltration (referred hereon as seepage) and to a lesser extent limit the potential for oxygen to diffuse into the underlying PAF tailings. One of the installed barrier cover trials at Bobadil TSF incorporates a geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) at the interface between the tailings and the overlying cover comprised of glacial till (450 mm) and Moorland peat (150 mm). The Moorland peat provides a perched phreatic zone that is largely anoxic and limits the potential for deeprooted trees to establish, that may potentially damage the GCL. Further, the peat provides the preferred environmental conditions for shallowrooted native grasses that will enhance the water transpiration from the cover and create an ecological community that is sympathetic to the surrounding landscape. As an alternative the barrier cover trials include a variant in which the GCL is removed. Both cover trials have been highly instrumented to allow the assessment of their relative performance over the next 3–5 years. This paper describes the first six months of performance monitoring, specifically reporting on the volumetric water content, matric suction and oxygen diffusion at various depths within the cover and tailings profile and the rates of seepage through the cover. The monitoring to date indicates that the barrier cover variant incorporating the GCL liner achieves the design objectives and the variant without the GCL liner does not.

Keywords: cover design, geochemistry, acid rock drainage

References:
Bews, BE, O’Kane, MA, Wilson, GW, Williams, DJ & Currey, NA 1997, ‘The design of a low flux cover system including lysimeters for acid generating waste rock in semi-arid environments’, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Acid Rock Drainage, pp. 747–762.
Cedergren, H 1977, Seepage, Drainage, and Flow Nets, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Flint AL, Campbell GS, Ellett KM & Calissendorff C 2002, ‘Calibration and temperature correction of heat dissipation matric potential sensors’, Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 66, pp. 1439–1445.
Geo-Slope International Limited 2012, Seepage Modeling with SEEP/W: An Engineering Methodology, July 2012 edition, Geo-Slope International, Calgary, viewed 14 June 2022,
modeling.pdf?v=8.0.7.6129
O’Kane, M & Barbour, L 2003, ‘Predicting field performance of Lysimeters used to evaluate cover systems for mine waste’, in the Sixth International Conference on Acid Rock Drainage, pp. 327–339.
Queensland Government 2020, viewed 22 October 2020,
Walczak, R, Rovdan, E & Witkowska-Walczak, B 2002, ‘Water retention characteristic of peat and sand mixtures’, International Agrophysics, vol. 16, pp. 161–165.




© Copyright 2022, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au