Authors: Greaser, K; Weinig, W

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2215_84

Cite As:
Greaser, K & Weinig, W 2022, 'The importance of climate for evapotranspiration cover design', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2022: 15th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1139-1152, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2215_84

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Mine closure typically includes covering various waste facilities to stabilise landforms, control seepage, reduce erosion, and protect the environment. Commonly, evapotranspiration covers (also referred to as alternative, store and release, or water balance covers) are preferred for many mine sites. Evapotranspiration (ET) covers rely on evaporation and transpiration to reduce seepage through mine waste, which may require management or treatment to avoid adverse environmental impacts. Given ET covers rely on the natural processes of evaporation and transpiration to reduce seepage, the surrounding climate will ultimately control the performance of the ET cover. Consequently, climate is a key factor in predicting the performance of an ET cover. Several guidance documents have been published regarding best practices for the design of ET covers, although current guidance does not include comprehensive, detailed standards or best practices to develop a climate set to be used in soil-atmosphere modelling to design ET covers. This paper presents important factors to consider when compiling a climate set for soil-atmosphere modelling to design an ET cover, beyond the generalisations in current guidance documents, so that designers can make informed decisions when developing a representative climate set. Ideally, a climate set for soil-atmosphere modelling to support ET cover design would be developed using 100year dataset, including co-located, daily measured precipitation and estimated potential evapotranspiration (PET). Using a shorter climate set presents the risk of over- or underestimating net infiltration. Accurate simulation of the variation of both precipitation and PET at several time scales is critical for ET cover design. This includes the distribution of precipitation and PET throughout the year as well as variations over the long-term. Representing the distribution of precipitation seasonally (e.g. between winter and summer or dry and wet seasons), the number of days of precipitation in a year, the intensity of precipitation, and the frequency of storm cycles are important considerations. The relationship between precipitation and PET is critical to understand and simulate appropriately. Because relationships between precipitation and temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and solar radiation are complex, combining data measured at multiple sites may not represent climate at any one site appropriately. When compiling climate sets, significant preference should be given to scaling climate data from one location rather than combining data from multiple locations. Further, although many climate models have been developed, users should be aware of the basis of formulation for each model, the errors in the models, the quality of the data used to develop the model, and comparisons of the modelled data to measured data for the mine site to adjust the modelled data appropriately. Finally, developing a robust climate set with uncertainty limited to a practical extent will also serve to reduce uncertainty in predicting the potential influence of climate change.

Keywords: evapotranspiration cover design, water balance cover design, soil-atmosphere modelling, climate for soil-atmosphere modelling

References:
Albright, WH, Benson, CH & Waugh, WJ 2009, Water Balance Covers for Waste Containment: Principles and Practice, ASCE Press, Reston.
Allen, RG, Pereira, LS, Raes, D & Smith, M 1998, Crop Evapotranspiration, Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome
Allen, RG, Walter, IA, Elliott, R, Howell, T, Itenfisu, D & Jensen, M (eds.) 2005, The ASCE Standardized Reference Evapotranspiration Equation, ASCE-EWRI Task Committee Report, Reston.
Colorado State University 2022, CoAgMET, accessed March 2022,
Federal Government of the United States 1978, Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978, public law 95-604.
Global Tailings Review 2020, Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management, accessed May 2022,
Greaser, K, Norris, A & Scalia, J 2022, ‘Influence of Climate Data Substitutions for Evapotranspiration Cover Design’, Proceedings of Tailings and Mine Waste 2022, Colorado State University, Denver, in press.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2014, Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, RK Pachauri & LA Meyer (eds.), Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva.
International Network for Acid Prevention 2017, Global Cover System Design Technical Guidance Document,
International Network for Acid Prevention 2022, Global Acid Rock Drainage Guide (GARD Guide), accessed March 2022,
Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council 2003, Technical and Regulatory Guidance for Design, Installation, and Monitoring of Alternative Final Landfill Covers, Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Washington.
Logsdon, MJ 2013, ‘What does “perpetual” management and treatment mean? toward a framework for determining an appropriate period-of-performance for management of reactive, sulfide-bearing mine wastes’, in A Brown, L Figueroa & C Wolkersdorfer (eds), Proceedings of the International Mine Water Association Conference, Reliable Mine Water Technology, Golden,
pp. 53–58.
Mine Environment Neutral Drainage 2004, Design, Construction and Performance Monitoring of Cover Systems for Waste Rock and Tailings, 2.21.4, 92 p.
Mine Environment Neutral Drainage 2012, Cold Regions Cover System Design Technical Guidance Document, 1.61.5c, 177 p.
Mirzabe, AH, Hajiahmad, A, Keyhani, A & Mirzaei, N 2022, ‘Approximation of daily solar radiation: A comprehensive review on employing of regression models’, Renewable Energy Focus, vol. 41, pp. 143–159.
National Centers for Environmental Information National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 2022, Climate Data Online, accessed March 2022,
Remote Automatic Weather Stations 2022, RAWS USA Climate Archive, accessed March 2022,
Richardson, CW & Wright, DA 1984, WGEN: A Model for Generating Daily Weather Variables, United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service ARS-8, Maryland.
Sengupta, M, Xie, Y, Lopez, A, Habte, A, Maclaurin, G & Shelby, J 2018, ‘The national solar radiation data base (NSRDB)’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 89, pp. 51–60.
SolarGIS 2022, Surface Albedo – Most Frequent Questions, accessed March 2022,
United States Bureau of Reclamation 2022, AgriMet Weather Data, Accessed March 2022,
pn/agrimet/wxdata.html
World Bank Group, Climate Change Knowledge Portal 2022, Download Data, accessed May 2022,




© Copyright 2022, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au