Authors: Finucane, SJ; Bibby, RA

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2315_027

Cite As:
Finucane, SJ & Bibby, RA 2023, 'Closure disclosure—mine closure planning and reporting through an ESG lens', in B Abbasi, J Parshley, A Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2023: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2315_027

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
ESG (Environment, Social, Governance) is fundamentally a tool to measure business risk and opportunity. Companies that understand how ESG factors can impact or influence their business are generally more attractive to those that want to invest in an ethical manner than companies that do not have this insight. Most mining companies with shareholders and investors routinely consider and report on ESG factors in relation to mining operations, but it is not as common to consider mine closure through an ESG lens. The term ‘ESG’ relates to a framework of indicators that can be used to measure the sustainability and ethical impact of a company or investment as a way of mitigating business risks and identifying new business opportunities. Mining companies are progressively seeking alignment with key ESG values, and investors are increasingly prioritising ESG in their investment appraisals. However, investors can only reward solid ESG performance if they can access the right information to inform due diligence assessments and investment decisions. Investors usually refer to corporate sustainability reports during such assessments, but these often contain only data on rehabilitation footprints. By comparison, many ESG disclosure frameworks require mine closure information, but many mining companies do not consider mine closure risks as material and therefore do not include this the information in their disclosures and associated reporting. This paper discusses how selected sustainability and ESG disclosure frameworks address mine closure. These comprise the Global Reporting Initiative’s Sustainability Reporting Standards, the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board’s Sustainability Standards, the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, the Carbon Disclosure Project and the International Council on Mining and Metals’ Sustainable Development Framework, along with the recently adopted Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. The way in which 12 mining and mineral processing companies have addressed mine closure under these frameworks in their sustainability and ESG reports is also discussed, along with observations on mine closure planning, implementation and reporting through an ESG lens including promotion of closure credentials when reporting to investor-recognised frameworks.

Keywords: ESG, sustainability reporting, mine closure, disclosure frameworks, climate-related financial disclosures, biodiversity, nature-positive

References:
Allkem Limited 2022, Sustainability Report 2022, viewed 30 April 2023,
Anglo American plc 2023, Sustainability Report 2022, viewed 23 May 2023,
Bainton, N & Holcombe, S 2018, ‘A critical review of the social aspects mine closure’, Resources Policy, vol. 59, pp. 468-478.
Barakos, G & Mischo, H 2021, ‘Insertion of the social license to operate into the early evaluation of technical and economic aspects of mining projects: Experiences from the Norra Kärr and Bokan Dotson rare earth element projects’, The Extractive Industries and Society, vol. 8, issue 2, viewed 3 June 2023,
Brightest Inc 2023, Defining ESG vs. Sustainability – What’s the difference?, viewed 4 June 2023,
Campbell, R & Tivey, J 2022, Mining & Metals 2022: ESG and energy transition – the sector’s biggest opportunity, viewed 26 April 2023,
Capital Group 2022, ESG Global Study 2022, viewed 4 June 2023,
Chalmers, J, Cox, E & Picard, N 2021, The economic realities of ESG, viewed 28 May 2023,
Climate Disclosure Project 2023a, How companies can take action, viewed 18 June 2023,
Climate Disclosure Project 2023b, Guidance for companies, viewed 18 June 2023,
Davies, S, Hewitt, J & Carty, I 2023, Global: The continued risk of ESG investor demands in the mining sector, viewed 22 March 2023,
Ernst & Young 2021, Top 10 business risks and opportunities for mining and metals in 2022, viewed 3 March 2023,
Ernst & Young 2022, Top 10 business risks and opportunities for mining and metals in 2023, viewed 3 March 2023,
Gates, M, Hupart, J & Rubin, J 2022, Who Should be in Charge of Board ESG Responsibilities?, viewed 17 June 2023,
Glencore plc 2023, Sustainability Report 2022, viewed 15 April 2023,
Global Reporting Initiative 2023a, Our mission and history, viewed 7 June 2023,
Global Reporting Initiative 2023b, The global standards for sustainability impacts, viewed 7 June 2023,
Ground, J 2022, ESG Global Study 2022, viewed 19 May 2023,
HSBC 2023, Sustainability vs ESG: What’s the Difference and Why They Matter, viewed 4 June 2023,
International Council for Mining and Metals 2019, Financial Concepts for Mine Closure, viewed 2 April 2023,
International Council for Mining and Metals 2022, Social and Economic Reporting Framework and Guidance, viewed 16 June 2023,
International Council for Mining and Metals 2023, Our Principles, viewed 12 June 2023,
International Union for Conservation of Nature 2022, Issues Brief. Post-2020 global biodiversity framework, viewed 12 December 2022,
Kinross Gold 2023, Trusted Partner. 2022 Sustainability and ESG Report, viewed 1 June 2023,
KPMG (2022) Big Shifts, Small Steps. Survey of Sustainability Reporting 2022, viewed 5 June 2023,
Legge, H, Muuler-Falcke, C, Naucler, T & Ostgren, E 2021, Creating the zero-carbon mine, viewed 5 June 2023,
Leka, L 2022, Board Oversight of Sustainability and ESG, viewed 4 June 2023, ,ESG%20priorities%20throughout%20the%20organization.
Maybee, B, Lilford, E & Hitch, M 2023, ‘Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) risk, uncertainty, and the mining life cycle’, The Extractive Industries and Society, vol. 14, viewed 3 June 2023,
Meredith, S 2023, World’s biggest investment fund says firms mismanaging climate risk could face exclusion from next year, viewed 3 June 2023,
Mineral Resources Limited 2022, 2022 Sustainability Report, viewed 3 April 2023,
Mitchell, P 2022, Top 10 business risks and opportunities for mining and metals in 2023, viewed 20 March 2023,
Nemeth, A 2021, Top ESG Reporting Frameworks, Explained, viewed 9 July 2022,
Newcrest Mining Limited 2022, 2022 Sustainability Report, viewed 4 April 2023,
Newmont Corporation 2023, 2022 Sustainability Report, viewed 4 April 2023,
Northern Star Limited 2022, 2022 Sustainability Report, viewed 4 April 2023,
O’Kane Consultants 2023, COP-15’s New Biodiversity Framework and Integrated Mine Planning. viewed 21 March 2023,
Patel, S (2022) Five key risk considerations investors care about, viewed 30 May 2023, ,opportunities%20for%20growth%20and%20improvement.
Peabody 2022, 2021 Environmental, Social and Governance Report, viewed 18 June 2023,
Pilbara Minerals Limited 2022, 2022 Annual Report, viewed 5 April 2023,
Pollard, D & Bebbington, J 2022, ESG and sustainability – different but related ideas, viewed 4 June 2023,
PricewaterhouseCoopers 2021, Mining firms with higher ESG ratings outperform the market, viewed 28 May 2023,
Regis Resources Ltd 2022, Sustainability Report 2022, viewed 30 May 2023,
Sandfire Resources 2023, 2022 Sustainability Report, viewed 1 June 2023,
South32 Limited 2022, Sustainable Development Report 2022, viewed 1 June 2023,
Sustainability Accounting Standards Board 2021a, Metals & Mining Sustainability Accounting Standard, SASB Standards Board, version 2021-12.
Sustainability Accounting Standards Board 2021b, Coal Operations Sustainability Accounting Standard, SASB Standards Board, version 2021-12.
Sustainability Accounting Standards Board 2023, About Us, viewed 7 June 2023,
Task Force of Climate-related Financial Disclosures 2017a, Final Report. Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, viewed 16 February 2023,
Task Force of Climate-related Financial Disclosures 2017b, Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures Public Consultant Summary, viewed 16 February 2023,
Task Force of Climate-related Financial Disclosures 2023, About, viewed 16 June 2023,
Vagenas, J 2021, 7 reasons why ESG issues present the biggest risk for the mining sector today, viewed 7 April 2023,
Willard, B 2022, ‘Sustainability’ vs ‘ESG’, viewed 14 April 2023,
World Commission on Environment and Development 1990, Our Common Future, Australian Edition, Oxford University Press, Melbourne, Victoria.




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au