Authors: Gemson, WJ; Harck, T

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2315_059

Cite As:
Gemson, WJ & Harck, T 2023, 'Preparing for closure—systematic framework for water quality reviews', in B Abbasi, J Parshley, A Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2023: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2315_059

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Water is the golden thread that runs through closure planning considerations and potential for long-term water quality impacts presents one of the main challenges for effective closure of mine sites. The majority of operating mines sites have existing water quality programmes in place to assess and manage such water quality impacts. However, these programmes often developed organically over time in response to specific matters arising at a site. Operational monitoring programmes further typically have a focus on compliance matters, and monitoring data are at times underutilised when it comes to understanding water quality dynamics at a mine site. In recognition of the above, we have reviewed large water quality datasets forming part of existing monitoring programmes for a range of mines sites (~10 mine sites) in the Pilbara region of Western Australia, with the aim of understanding spatial and temporal trends to support risk management and closure planning. These programmes included compliance monitoring for ground and surface water (water levels and chemistry data) for monitoring as well as production bores and pit water grab sampling data. The objectives of these reviews included assessing whether the existing surface and groundwater monitoring programmes indicate trends in water quality, to identify the geochemical process controlling such trends and whether the existing monitoring plans are fit to address the overall risk management at closure. The reviews identified gaps/improvements in the programmes and the opportunities to develop closure focussed monitoring programmes that prioritise monitoring locations, specify monitoring parameters and frequency to support long term planning. The paper outlines a systematic framework for conducting these reviews and how the outcomes of these reviews can lead to the development of adaptive monitoring programmes in support of closure planning.

Keywords: water quality monitoring, acid and metalliferous drainage, closure planning

References:
ANZECC, ARMCANZ, 2000, Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality. Canberra & Auckland: Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council, Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand.
ANZG, 2018, Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh & Marine Water Quality. Canberra & Auckland: Australia and New Zealand Governments (ANZG). Available online: www.waterquality.gov.au/anz-guidelines.
DWER, 2021, Guideline, Assessment and Management of Contaminated Sites. Perth: Department of Water and Environmental Regulation, November 2021.
Fu, L., & Wang, Y.-G., 2012, Statistical tools for analyzing water quality data. In D. Voutsa, & K. Voudouris, Water quality monitoring and assessment (pp. 143-168). London: InTech.
Gemson, W., Weaver, T., & Heemink, B., 2019, Key considerations that can make or break a closure-focused groundwater-monitoring program. Mine Closure 2019 (pp. 1367-1375). Perth: Australian Centre for Geomechanics.
Hem, J., 1985, Study and Interpretation of the Chemical Characteristics of Natural Water (3rd edition). US Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2254.
Mine Environment Neutral Drainage Program (MEND), 1990, Monitoring Acid Mine Drainage. Prepared by Emily Robertson and Steffen Robertson and Kirsten (B.C.) Inc., MEND Project 4.7.1.
Murray, K., & Wade, P., 1996, Checking anion-cation charge balance of water quality analyses: Limitations of the traditional method for non-potable waters. Water SA, 22, 27-32.
NEPC, 1999, National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure. Canberra: National Environment Protection Council, December 1999, amended 2013.
International Network for Acid Prevention (INAP), 2014: Global Acid Rock Drainage Guide. Version number 1.0.
Singh, A., 2014, Extracting a Site-Specific Background Dataset for a Constituent from a Broader Dataset Consisting of Onsite Constituent Concentrations and Estimating Background Level Constituent Concentrations. Edison, N.J.: Lockheed Martin IS&GS-CIVIL and Tim Frederick, Region 4 and Nancy Rios-Jafolla, Region 3 United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au