Authors: Kellner, JR; Hall, A; Tanentzap, FM

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2355_64

Cite As:
Kellner, JR, Hall, A & Tanentzap, FM 2023, 'Critical timelines and pathways: addressing environmental, social, governance and permitting', in GW Wilson, NA Beier, DC Sego, AB Fourie & D Reid (eds), Paste 2023: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Paste, Thickened and Filtered Tailings, University of Alberta, Edmonton, and Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 812-820, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2355_64

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
The need for projects to focus on permitting and environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations is increasingly prioritised over the technical and economic aspects of backfill and tailings solutions. This includes not only environmental permitting, but also takes into account public perception and responses to a project, as well as local community engagement and support. To optimise the success of a project, it is essential to incorporate and understand both the mining companies’ ESG frameworks and the local and governmental permitting requirements from the beginning. There is a need to pull these more advanced backfill and tailings designs earlier into the process to satisfy permitting requirements rather than the usual execution schedule. Permitting timelines may also lead to temporary backfill solutions such as cemented rockfill until paste backfill can be permitted and implemented. Comparing surface versus underground permitting requirements can lead to a more strategic approach by evaluating alternative solutions for infrastructure placement. For example, some facilities can be located underground if surface is perceived to be contentious. This can also lead to an approach where facility placement that might be better suited underground, but a more conservative approach is to start on surface and move underground as the project progresses. Given the focus on ESG and permitting and the timelines involved, it is more important than ever to provide a narrative which conveys a responsible integrated tailings solution for mining projects, both for permitting and to ensure public support.

Keywords: permitting, ESG, underground, responsible, backfill, community engagement

References:
Bahera, SK, Mishra, DP, Singh, P, Mishra, K, Mandal, SK, Ghosh, CN, … & Mandal, PK 2021, ‘Utilization of mill tailings, fly ash and slag as mine paste backfill material: Review and future perspective’, Construction and Building Materials, vol. 309.
Barbour, SL, Wilson, GW & St-Arnaud, LC 1993, ‘Evaluation of the saturated-unsaturated groundwater conditions of a thickened tailings deposit’, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 905–919.
CEQ 2020, EIS Timelines, National Environmental Policy Act, viewed 27 December 2022,
Cescon, Barrieu, Flesch & Barreto Advofados 2021, Brazil: 2021 Mining Guide- Brazilian Law Overview, Trends, Perspectives and Opportunities,
Dieh, P 2022, List of Tailings Dam and Mine Waste Failures,
GAO 2020, Mining on Federal Lands: More Than 800 Operations Authorized to Mine and Total Mineral Production Is Unknown, viewed 2 January 2023,
Hickson, RJ & Owen, TL 2015, Project Management for Mining: Handbook for Delivering Project Success, Society for Mining Metallurgy and Exploration, Engelwood.
Kelley Jr, JE & Walker, WR 1959, ‘Critical-path planning and scheduling’, Proceedings of the Eastern Joint Computer Conference, pp. 160–173.
Khalil, A, Wijewickreme, D & Wilson GW 2010, ‘Mechanical response of highly gap-graded mixtures of waste rock and tailings. Part 1: Monotonic shear response’, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 47, no. 5. pp. 497–515.
Milanzi, M & Bond-Barnard, T 2017, ‘Exploring the effects of centralized procurement on projects in South African Matrix Mining Organizations’, PMI Australia Conference, Sydney,
Oberle, B 2002, Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management, Global Tailings Review,
Reid, C, Becaert, V, Audertin, M, Rosenbaum, RK, & Deschenes, L 2009, Life cycle assessment of mine tailings management in Canada. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 17, no. 4, pp 471-479.
SNL Metals & Mining 2015, Permitting, Economic Value, and Mining in the United States, prepared for The National Mining Association,
Theriault, JA, Frostiak, J & Welch, D 2001, ‘Surface Disposal of Paste Tailings at the Bulyanhulu Gold Mine, Tanzania’, Revista Escola de Minas, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 1–8.
Tenbergen, RA 2000, ‘Paste dewatering techniques and past plant circuit designs’, Tailings and Mine Waste 2000, pp 1-10.
Verburg, R & Oliveira, M 2016, ‘Surface waste disposal of high-sulfide tailings at neves-corvo-evaluation of environmental stability and operational experience’, Proceedings of the International Mine Water Association Conference, IMWA, Leipzig,
pp. 361–367.




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au