Authors: Whitbread-Abrutat, P

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_0.01

Cite As:
Whitbread-Abrutat, P 2024, 'A mine ends. Then what? Some reflections on best practice', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2024: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 3-16, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_0.01

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
With substantial progress in the practice of closing mines over the last three decades or so largely driven by better regulation and third-party standards, it is now technically achievable to close a mine to leave behind a ‘safe, stable and non-polluting’ site in harmony with regulatory requirements (long-term management requirements notwithstanding). However, such limited vision often does little to realise possibilities for rebuilding broader ecological integrity and enhancing people’s lives for the long-term – particularly those in mining communities. Mining sector practices (and policies) need further refinement to address such challenges, especially given the inevitable large-scale mine closures planned over the next couple of decades, and growing expectations for the responsible mining of critical metals and minerals to supply the green industrial revolution. Reflecting on over 30 years of research and the stories presented in the recently published not-for-profit book, 102 Things to Do with a Hole in the Ground, this paper will highlight how such challenges have been turned into pragmatic opportunities as illustrated with examples from around the world. It posits the notion that (arguably) there are few if any new problems in the mine closure/transition and post-mining regeneration space; bespoke solutions have been developed that address them by balancing environmental, social and financial outcomes (somewhere) by mining companies, government, communities and/or unexpected actors. The main challenges to converting such liabilities into new opportunities are, therefore, of perspective, communication and will. Building on the existing library of excellent mine closure good practice technical guidance, the paper will discuss further advances for doing more with our holes in the ground based on empirically derived, generic findings from the firsthand analysis of many hundreds of projects, including some non-mining examples too.

Keywords: mine closure planning, post-mining regeneration, compliance, best practice, transition, landscape narrative, community participation, creativity, unusual suspects, cultural identity, sense of place, restoration

References:
Chapman, P & Kemp, A 2019, ‘A case for consequence categories to guide the closure design of landforms’, in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2019: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 419–424,
Cole, MJ 2024, ‘A mine closure risk rating system for South Africa’, Mining, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 58–78.
Council of Europe 2000, Council of Europe Landscape Convention, (ETS Np. 176), Council of Europe, Florence.
Department of Mineral Resources and Energy 2021, Draft National Mine Closure Strategy 2020, Government Notices, Republic of South Africa, no. 446.
Donoso, RS, Martins, M, Palomino, MT, Víctor, JME, Ramos, FJL, Pereira, AM, Pinto, AM, Relvas, JM & Duque, JFM 2024, ‘Geomorphic-based mine rehabilitation coupled with AMD chemical stabilisation in sulphide-rich ore deposits and soils: insights from a pioneering intervention at the Lousal mine, Iberian pyrite belt’, International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 79–97.
European Union 2018, Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for the Management of Waste from Extractive Industries, in accordance with Directive 2006/21/EC, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, ISBN 978-92-79-77178-1,
Ferguson, K 2024, The Value of Generalists in Mine Closure Success, WSP Insights, viewed 18 August 2024,
Foote, KE & Azaryahu, M, 2009, ‘Sense of place’, International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, pp. 96–100.
Gillette, MB & Boyd, E 2024, ‘Mining heritage gone wrong: a study of disappointed tourists at China’s national mine parks’, Tourism Recreation Research,
ICMM 2019, Integrated Mine Closure Good Practice Guide, 2nd edition, International Council for Mining and Metals.
NSW Government 2024a, Parliamentary inquiry on beneficial and productive post-mining land use, viewed on 18 August 2024,
NSW Government 2024b, Parliament to Explore Productive Uses of Land After Mines Close, viewed on 18 August 2024, .
UNCTAD 2008, Creative Economy Report 2008, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
Whitbread-Abrutat, PH 2013, ‘Lessons for the mining industry from non-mining landscape restoration experiences’, in M Tibbett, AB Fourie & C Digby (eds), Mine Closure 2013: Proceedings of the Eighth International Seminar on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Cornwall, pp. 625–639,
Whitbread-Abrutat, PH & Lowe, R 2024, 102 Things to Do with a Hole in the Ground, Eden Project.




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au