Authors: Mackenzie, S; Smedley, E

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_03

Cite As:
Mackenzie, S & Smedley, E 2024, 'Building durable legacies: a holistic approach to closure design for mining landforms', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2024: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 71-84, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_03

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Rehabilitating a mining landform necessitates the development of a closure design, setting the parameters for effective implementation. Commonly, however, an arbitrary design is adopted during the planning phase without adequate consideration of crucial design inputs such as the erosional stability properties of waste rock, relative proportions of different waste types, regional climate, design criteria, spatial constraints, constructability and risk. This arbitrary approach fails to develop a tailored design solution that responds to the key drivers for longterm performance and is unlikely to consider opportunities to incorporate integrated closure planning. An effective design can only be developed in response to these design inputs, rather than trying to force these inputs to function in a pre-defined design. For instance, the closure design for a mining landform where most of the waste rock is forecast to have durable/high-stability should be different than for a landform where most of the waste rock is predicted to have low stability. Likewise, the design should be different when considering a tropical climate as opposed to an arid setting. The same design should not arbitrarily be adopted for both; rather, the design should respond to the site-specific materials and the constraints of the mine plan. Once the key inputs are understood, risks and opportunities can be developed to inform the identification and evaluation of design options. Such a design approach is essential for building durable legacies for future generations. This paper explores current design approaches and highlights key inputs that influence long-term closure performance, providing practical examples to illustrate effective design strategies.

Keywords: closure design, landform design, mining landforms, rehabilitation design

References:
Australian National Committee on Large Dams 2019, Guidelines on Tailings Dams – Planning, Design, Construction, Operation and Closure, Hobart.
Ball, J, Babister, M, Nathan, R, Weeks, W, Weinmann, E, Retallick, M & Testoni, I (eds) 2019, Australian Rainfall and Runoff: A Guide to Flood Estimation, Geoscience Australia, Canberra.
Chapman, P & Kemp, A 2019, ‘A case for consequence categories to guide the closure design of landforms’, in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2019: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 419–424,
Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety 2020, Mine Closure Plan Guidance – How to Prepare in Accordance with Part 1 of the Statutory Guidelines for Mine Closure Plans, Government of Western Australia, Perth.
Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety 2021, Waste Rock Dumps – Guidelines, Government of Western Australia, Perth.
Fawcett, M 2002, ‘Provisioning for mine closure’, in ACMER short course on Achieving Sustainable Mine Closure Outcomes, Darwin.
Fleury, A & Parsons, AS 2006, ‘Integrated mine closure planning’, in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2006: Proceedings of the First International Seminar on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 221–226,
International Council on Mining & Metals, 2019, Integrated Mine Closure – Good Practice Guide, 2nd edn, London.
International Council on Mining & Metals, UN Environment Programme & Principle for Responsible Investment 2020, Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management, London.
International Network for Acid Prevention 2017, Global Cover System Design – Technical Guidance Document.
Lu, H & Yu, B 2002, ‘Spatial and seasonal distribution of rainfall erosivity in Australia’, Australian Journal of Soil Research, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 887 – 901,
Mackenzie, S & Lacy, HWB, Koontz, D 2006, ‘Benefits of planned versus unplanned mine closure and strategies for both’, in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2006: Proceedings of the First International Seminar on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 227–235,
NSW Resources Regulator 2021, Landform Evolution Modelling and Geomorphic Design Principles for Mine Rehabilitation Landforms, Maitland.
Smedley, E, Mackenzie, S & Gregory, S 2019, ‘How long is long enough? Adopting a risk-based approach to inform drainage management in closure designs’, in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2019: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1499–1508,
Wesley, G, Mackenzie, S & Campbell, G 2019, ‘Mine waste characterisation: the benefits of applying practical geological knowledge’, in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2019: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 275–286,




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au