DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_05
Cite As:
Measham, T, Walker, J, Haslam McKenzie, F, Samper, A, Brereton, D & Boggs, G 2024, 'Progress towards implementing a research agenda towards post-mining transitions ', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds),
Mine Closure 2024: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 99-106,
https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_05
Abstract:
Mine closure does not have a great track record. While there are some important exceptions, too few mines have achieved effective closure, lease relinquishment and a positive legacy. Many of the reasons for this have been articulated through the Mine Closure Conference community. At the same time, there is a growing momentum towards thinking beyond closure and focusing on how to achieve better post-mining transitions by repurposing sites and delivering improved social and economic outcomes, and recognising the crucial role of First Nations people. Following the foundational stage of the Cooperative Research Centre for Transformations in Mining Economies, a research agenda was put forward focusing on four key aspects. The first of these is the need for deliberation on what post-mining transition means in different contexts. The second is the need to develop ways to incorporate a wider range of values into closure post-mine transition planning, to ensure future sustainability in livelihoods and environment. The third is the importance of integration and forecasting across a spectrum of biophysical, social and economic aspects of mine closure and transition. The fourth is to focus on elevating the scale for mine closure and transition planning, from the site to the regional scale and beyond. This paper summarises progress to date by the Cooperative Research Centre for Transformations in Mining Economies and adjacent work towards implementing this agenda.
Keywords: beyond closure, mining, Indigenous, repurposing, just transition, regional development, postmining land use
References:
Arratia-Solar, A, Svobodova, K, Lèbre, É, & Owen, JR 2022, ‘Conceptual framework to assist in the decision-making process when planning for post-mining land-uses’, The Extractive Industries and Society, vol. 10,
Australian Human Rights Commission 2010, The Community Guide to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Australian Human Rights Commission,
community_guide.pdf
Bainton, N & Holcombe, S 2018, ‘A critical review of the social aspects of mine closure’, Resources Policy, vol. 59, pp. 468–478,
Beer, A, Haslam-McKenzie, F, Weller, S, Davies, A, Cote, C, Ziemski, M, Holmes, K & Keenan, J 2022, Post-Mining Land Uses, CRC TiME, Perth.
CRC TiME 2024a, ‘Broadening NPV through a multi-criteria optimisation framework based on CRC TiME values research’,
CRC TiME 2024b, ‘First Nations VET pathway (Stage 1 & 2)’,
CRC TiME 2024c, ‘Mine pit lake assessments and management: a national initiative to support mine closure and regional opportunities’,
CRC TiME 2024d, ‘Identifying future economic development pathways for mining regions and increasing transition capacity’,
-pathways-for-mining-regions-and-increasing-transition-capacity.pdf
Cook, PG, Black, S, Cote, C, Kahe, MS, Linge, K, Oldham, C, … C & Wallis, I 2021, Hydrological and Geochemical Processes and Closure Options for Below Water Table Open Pit Mines, CRC TiME, Perth.
Cote, CM, Garcia Zavala, C, Chrystal, R, Asmussen, P 2022a, Integration of Biophysical Aspects in Mine Closure Planning, CRC TiME, Perth.
Cote, CM, Asmussen, P & Gentle, C 2022b, Dynamically Transforming Environmental Assessment Through a Shared Analytics Framework: Bowen Basin Case Study, CRC TiME, Perth.
Dunow, T & Kalisch, B 2022, ‘The high cost of poor closure estimates’, in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2022: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth,
Feaster, S 2023, U.S. on Track to Close Half of Coal Capacity by 2026, Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis,
Fleming, DA, & Measham, TG 2014, ‘Local job multipliers of mining’, Resources Policy, vol. 41, pp. 9–15,
Foran, T, Barber, M & Ackermann, F 2022, Understanding the Values of Stakeholders in Australian Post-Mining Economies, CRC TiME, Perth.
Foran, T, Reeves, J & Haque, K 2024, Collaborative Planning for People Navigating Mine Land Transition: Progress in Australia’s Latrobe Valley Stage 1 Report, CRC TiME, Perth.
Hamblin, L, Gardner, A & Haigh, Y 2022, Mapping the Regulatory Framework of Mine Closure, CRC TiME, Perth.
Haslam McKenzie, FM & Eyles, S 2024, ‘Future‐proofing a local government authority for a post‐mining future’, Geographical Research, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 293–308,
Horowitz, LS, Keeling, A, Lévesque, F, Rodon, T, Schott, S & Thériault, S 2018, ‘Indigenous peoples’ relationships to large-scale mining in post/colonial contexts: Toward multidisciplinary comparative perspectives’, The Extractive Industries and Society, vol. 5,
Lilford, E & Haque, A 2023, Limitations and Issues With Using The DCF NPV Method For Valuations Of Mine Closure And Post Mine Closure, CRC TiME, Perth.
Latrobe City Council 2021, Energy Australia Announces Closure of Yallourn Power Station,
Lèbre, É, Owen, JR, Stringer, M, Kemp, D & Valenta, RK 2021, ‘Global scan of disruptions to the mine life cycle: price, ownership, and local impact’, Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 4324–4331.
Maybee, B, Lilford, E & Hitch, M 2023, ‘Environmental, social and governance (ESG) risk, uncertainty, and the mining life cycle’, The Extractive Industries and Society, vol. 14,
Measham, T, Ackermann, F, Everingham, J, Barber, M, Haslam-McKenzie, F & Maybee, B 2021, Understanding Stakeholder Values in Postmining Economies: a Literature Review, CRC TiME, Perth.
Measham, TG, Walker, J, McKenzie, FH, Kirby, J, Williams, C, D'Urso, J, … Boggs, G 2024, ‘Beyond closure: a literature review and research agenda for post-mining transitions’, Resources Policy, vol. 90,
Miller-Sabbioni, C, Goerke, V, Downing, M & van Leeuwen, S 2023, The Foundations for Effective Indigenous Inclusion, CRC TiME, Perth.
Mills, LN 2022, ‘Getting closure? Mining rehabilitation reform in Queensland and Western Australia’, The Extractive Industries and Society, vol. 11,
Monosky, M & Keeling, A 2021, ‘Planning for social and community-engaged closure: A comparison of mine closure plans from Canada's territorial and provincial North’, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 277,
j.jenvman.2020.111324
Pepper, M, Hughes, M, & Haigh, Y 2021, ‘Loophole or lifeline? The policy challenges of mines in care and maintenance’, The Extractive Industries and Society, vol. 8, no. 3,
Pope, J & Young 2024, Regional Cumulative effects Assessment and Management for Transitions in Mining Economies Stage 1 Case Study Analysis Report, CRC TiME, Perth.
Purtill, J, Gagen, EJ, & Hamilton, B 2022, ‘A brief history of mine rehabilitation reforms in Queensland’, Environment and Planning Law Journal, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 64–78,
Purtill, J & Littleboy, AK 2023, ‘More and better mine rehabilitation – lessons from Queensland’, Proceedings of the 26th World Mining Conference, CSIRO, Brisbane.
Reeves, JM, Baumgartl, T, Morgan, D, Reimers, V & Green, M 2022, ‘Community capacity to envisage a post-mine future: rehabilitation options for Latrobe Valley brown coal mines’, in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2022: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 173–186,
Rixen, A, & Blangy, S 2016, ‘Life after Meadowbank: exploring gold mine closure scenarios with the residents of Qamini’tuaq (Baker Lake), Nunavut’, The Extractive Industries and Society, vol. 3, no. 2, 297–312,
United Nations 2011, Convention on Biological Diversity,
Vivoda, V, Kemp, D, & Owen, J 2019, ‘Regulating the social aspects of mine closure in three Australian states’, Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 405–424,
Worden, S, Svobodova, K, Côte, C & Bolz, P 2024, ‘Regional post-mining land use assessment: an interdisciplinary and multistakeholder approach’, Resources Policy, vol. 89,