Authors: Finucane, SJ

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_14

Cite As:
Finucane, SJ 2024, 'Ready, set, close! Assessing social values and community readiness for mine closure and post-closure transitions', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2024: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 213-230, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_14

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
This paper discusses two aspects often overlooked in planning for mine closure and transition to the next use of a former mine site: the social values that drive stakeholder perception of closure risks and opportunities as well as stakeholder readiness to be involved in closure planning and implementation. It is well understood that closing a mine and transitioning to the next land use is more likely to be successful when stakeholder engagement is comprehensive and inclusive. If a company feels that stakeholder engagement has been done well and key community issues have been addressed, it would likely expect consensus on the proposed closure plan. However, this is not always the case. This can occur for various reasons, but is almost inevitable if there is a lack of understanding of, or alignment with, the social values that strongly affect community responses during closure engagement programs. Social values are usually a complex configuration of environmental, community, economic and governance characteristics which can vary between individuals and groups depending on their context, interests, beliefs and experiences. Review of publicly available closure plans indicates that these usually outline key stakeholder issues, but seldom elucidate the social values that shape or underpin them, or allow for changes in them to be monitored over time, even though these changes could be material to closure planning processes and outcomes. Twinned with understanding social values is assessing stakeholder readiness for a mine to close and move to its next use. This is because people will only support what they see as reasonable, logical and doable, and will base that judgement on their own sets of personal, professional and other values. Therefore, this paper not only outlines important considerations in defining and monitoring the social values that shape stakeholder concerns and priorities but also discusses the key factors influencing stakeholder preparedness to participate effectively in mine closure planning and implementation from the perspective of selected stakeholder groups.

Keywords: social values, socially inclusive stakeholder engagement, community readiness

References:
Abreu, M & Jones, C 2021, ‘The shadow of the pithead: understanding social and political attitudes in former coal mining communities in the UK’, Applied Geography, vol. 131,
Amadei, B 2020, ‘A systems approach to building community capacity and resilience’, Challenges, vol. 11, no. 2,
10.3390/challe11020028
Bagshaw, A & Walsh, H 2023, Queensland Premier Announces Legislation to ‘Guarantee Future’ of Glenden, viewed 2 September 2023,
Bainton, N & Holcombe, S 2081a, The Social Aspects of Mine Closure: A Global Literature Review, Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining, Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane.
Bainton, N & Holcombe, S 2018b, ‘A critical review of the social aspects of mine closure’, Resources Policy, vol. 59, pp. 468–478,
Beer, A, Haslam-McKenzie, F, Weller, S, Davies, A, Cote, C, Ziemski, M, Holmes, K, & Keenan, J 2022, Post-Mining Land Uses, CRC TiME, Perth.
Boggs, G, Measham, T, Littleboy, A & Haslam McKenzie, F 2022, ‘Transformation for positive post mine futures’, in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2022: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 49–62, 
Castañeda, SF, Holscher, J, Mumman, MK, Salgado, H, Keir, KB, Foster-Fishman, PG & Talavera, GA 2012, ‘Dimensions of community and organizational readiness for change’, Progress in Community Health Partnerships Research Education and Action, vol. 6, no. 2,
Chaloping-March, M 2008, ‘Business expediency, contingency and socio-political realities — a case of unplanned mine closure’, in AB Fourie, M Tibbett, I Weiersbye & P Dye (eds), Mine Closure 2008: Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 863871,
Chaskin, RJ 1999, Defining Community Capacity: A Framework and Implications from a Comprehensive Community Initiative, The Chapin Hall Centre for Children at the University of Chicago, Chicago.
Cole, MJ 2024, ‘A mine closure risk rating system for South Africa’, Mining, vol. 4, no. 1, pp 58–78,
mining4010005
Cole, MJ, Mthenjane, M & van Zyl, AT 2023, ‘Assessing coal mine closures and mining community profiles for the ‘just transition’ in South Africa’, The Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 123, pp. 329–341,
10.17159/2411-9717/2689/2023
Cox, S, Biggs, A, Alker, J & Smith, A 2021, Framework for Defining Social Value, viewed 2 May 2024,
framework-for-defining-social-value/
Creagh, B 2016, Glencore to Close Newlands Coal Mine, viewed 1 June 2024,
Edwards, RW, Jumper-Thurman, P, Plested, BA, Oetting, ER & Swanson, L 2000, ‘The community readiness model: research to practice’, Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 291–307, ;2-9
Esteves, AM & Vanclay, F 2009, ‘Social development needs analysis as a tool for SIA to guide corporate-community investment: applications in the minerals industry’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 137–145,
10.1016/j.eiar.2008.08.004
Everingham, J & Mackenzie, S 2024, ‘Assessing social impacts of mine closure’, paper presented at the 43rd Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment, Dublin.
Finucane, SJ, Hanson, RT & Rolston, HM 2024, ‘Practical tools and recommendations for effective stakeholder engagement of risk and opportunity for contaminated sites’, poster presented at the Thirteenth International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Denver.
Finucane-Woodman, MKJ & Finucane, SJ 2019, ‘Overcoming adverse stakeholder perception affecting tenement relinquishment’, in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2019: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1437–1450, 
Fischhoff, B, Brewer, NT & Downs, JS 2011, Communicating Risks and Benefits: An Evidence-based User’s Guide, Food and Drug Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.
Foot, B 2023, Social Value Considerations in Planning for Mine Closure and Transitions, viewed 30 May 2024,
sites/default/files/2023-09/9.%20Bobbie%20Foot.pdf
Forget, M & Rossi, M 2021, ‘Mining region value and vulnerabilities: evolutions over the mine life-cycle’, The Extractive Industries and Society, vol. 8, no. 1, pp 176–187,
Glencore 2024, Newlands Coal, viewed 5 June 2024,
Goksoy, A 2012, ‘The impact of job insecurity, role ambiguity, self monitoring and perceived fairness of previous change on individual readiness for change’, Journal of Global Strategic Management, vol. 11, pp. 112–121,
JGSM.2012615790
Harris, K, Brown, B, Shankle, L, Tyron, M, Pedersen, M, Kehaulani Panarella, S & Swaney, G 2019, ‘Community readiness model for prevention planning: addressing childhood obesity in American Indian reservation communities’, Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1144–1156,
Holcombe, S, Elliott, V, Keeling, A, Berryman, M, Hall, R, Ngaamo, R, … Ross River Lands Office 2022, Indigenous Exchange Forum: Transitions in Mine Closure, Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining, University of Queensland, St Lucia.
Keefe, EM, Naumann, RB, Evenson, KR, LaJeunesse, S, Heiny, S & Hassmiller Lich, K 2024, ‘Using an adapted community readiness assessment to inform Vision Zero and safe system action’, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, vol. 23, pp. 1–10,
Keenan, J 2020, Examining Mine Closure Through the Lens of Industry Social Practitioners, Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining, The University of Queensland, St Lucia,
Keenan, J & Holcombe, S, 2021, ‘Mining as a temporary land use: A global stocktake of post-mining transitions and repurposing’, The Extractive Industries and Society, vol. 8, no. 3,
Kelly, KJ, Edwards, RW, Comello, MLG, Plested, BA, Thurman, PJ & Slater, MD 2003, ‘The Community Readiness Model: a complementary approach to social marketing’, Marketing Theory, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 411–426,
1470593103042006
Kozlowska-Woszczycka, A & Pactwa, K 2024, ‘Diagnosis of the Walbrzych post-mining area: pilot study using social participation’, The Extractive Industries and Society, vol. 17, pp. 1–15,
Lamb, K & Coakes, S 2012, ‘Effective social planning for mine closure’, in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2012: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 627–639,
Lerch, D 2018, Six Foundations for Community Resilience, viewed 5 June 2024,
Leyton-Flor, SA & Sangha, K 2024, ‘The socio-ecological impacts of mining on the well-being of Indigenous Australians: a systematic review’, The Extractive Industries and Society, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1–14,
Marais, L, Burton, J, Campbell, M & Nel, E 2022, ‘Mine closure in the coal industry: global and national perspectives’, in L Marais, P Burger, M Campbell, SP Denoon-Stevens & D van Rooyen (eds), Coal and Energy in South Africa: Considering a Just Transition, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 34–43, viewed 2 May 2024,
stable/10.3366/jj.7358700
Measham, T, Ackermann, F, Everingham, J, Barber, M, Haslam-McKenzie, F & Maybee, B 2021, Understanding Stakeholder Values in Post-mining Economies: A Literature Review, CRC TiME, Perth.
Measham, T, Walker, J, Haslam-McKenzie, F, Kirby, J, Williams, C, D’Urso, J, … Boggs, G, 2024, ‘Beyond closure: a literature review and research agenda for post-mining transitions’, Resources Policy, vol. 90,
Ndaguba, E & Marais, l 2023, ‘A scientometric analysis of mine closure research’, Environment, Development and Sustainability,
Nickerson, C 2024, Values Meaning in Sociology, viewed 3 March 2024,
O’Malley, N 2019, ‘How Germany closed its coal industry without sacking a single miner’, The Sydney Morning Herald , viewed 2 May 2024,
Peers for Progress 2021, Assessing Community Readiness for Innovative Strategies, viewed 16 August 2023,
Pelling, M, Sharpe, J, Gerger Swartling, A, Pearson, L, Abeling, T, Deeming, H & Forrester, J 2015, Social Learning and Resilience Building in the emBRACE Framework, European Commission.
Ropeik, D 2002, Understanding Factors of Risk Perception, Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, Cambridge, viewed 22 April 2024,
Ross, N & Bond, B 2008, ‘Viability of aboriginal communities beyond mine closure’, in AB Fourie, M Tibbett, I Weiersbye & P Dye (eds), Mine Closure 2008: Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 873–878, 
Siyongwana, PQ & Shabalala, A 2019, ‘The socio-economic impacts of mine closure on local communities: evidence from Mpumalanga Province in South Africa’, GeoJournal, vol. 84, pp. 367–380,
Slovic , P 2001, The Perception of Risk, Earthscan, London.
Slovic, P & Peters, E 2006, ‘Risk perception and affect’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 322–325,
Stevens, R 2021, Current Status of Mine Closure Readiness. Are Governments Prepared?, International Institute for Sustainable Development, pp. 1–8, viewed 29 September 2023, ,regulations%2C%20enforcement%2C%20or%20capacity%20to%20manage%20mine%20closures
Svobodova, K 2019, ‘Life post-closure: perception and use of rehabilitated mine sites by local communities’, in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2019: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 333–344,
Thomson, O 2023, QRC Raises Concern Over Glenden Legislation, viewed 5 September 2023,
qrc-raises-concerns-over-glenden-legislation/
Transforming Indigenous Mental Health and Wellbeing Project 2023, Social and Emotional Wellbeing Gathering 4 Report: 31st July – 2nd August 2023, The University of Western Australia, Perth,
Tri-Ethnic Center for Prevention Research 2014, Community Readiness for Community Change. Tri-Ethnic Center Community Readiness Handbook, 2nd edn, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
Urban Footprint 2024, What is Community Resilience and Why Does It Matter, viewed 8 June 2024,
community-resilience-meaning/
University of Kansas 2024, Community Tool Box, viewed 9 June 2024,
Urry, 2017 In Germany's Appalachia, the Last Coal Mine is Closing, viewed 9 June 2024,
Vanclay, F 2002, ‘Conceptualising social impacts’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 183–211,
Vivoda, V, Kemp, D & Owen, J 2019, ‘Regulating the social aspects of mine closure in three Australian states’, Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, vol. 37, no. 4,
Worden, S, Svobodova, K, Cote, C & Bolz, P 2024, ‘Regional post-mining land use assessment: an interdisciplinary and multistakeholder approach’, Resources Policy, vol. 89, pp. 1–14,




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au