Social outcomes following mine closure: an abundance of good intentions undermined by a lack of leverage

Authors: Wall, L

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_19

Cite As:
Wall, L 2024, 'Social outcomes following mine closure: an abundance of good intentions undermined by a lack of leverage', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2024: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 275-284, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_19

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
As expectations around environmental and safety considerations of mine closure have solidified, focus is increasingly shifting towards the goals of and delivery against social aspects of mine closure. Many companies and practitioners cite the goal of achieving a ‘positive legacy’, however, the next level of definition of what this should comprise on an asset-by-asset basis is frequently absent, and questions of how a positive legacy is to be assessed, by whom, and over what time period remain. This paper reports on the results of a business survey developed to understand the drivers for performance in social aspects of closure from an industry perspective. The survey results note the high-level commitments/good intentions stated by companies at both corporate and asset levels, while also highlighting the relative lack of leverage of all parties to influence social aspects of closure. With regulators largely silent on the social outcomes to be achieved through a mine closure process, and communities holding limited leverage to influence decisions at the time of closure, the primary decision makers remain to be companies themselves. In this context, the goal of a ‘positive legacy’ remains largely undefined, provides insufficient clarity for asset level managers, leaving social closure planning vulnerable to budget cuts and shifting goal posts. This paper will argue improved performance in the social outcomes post mine closure requires not more good intentions, but the creation of greater leverage through definition of social closure criteria at an asset level, through enhanced focus on social outcomes in regulation and critically, greater community involvement in the design, implementation and assessment of social outcomes.

Keywords: positive legacy, mine closure, social considerations of mine closure, mine closure outcomes

References:
Bainton, N & Holcombe, S 2018a, 'A critical review of the social aspects of mine closure', Resources Policy, vol. 59, pp. 468–478.
Bainton, N & Holcombe, S 2018b, Social Aspects of Mine Closure, Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining, Sustainable Minerals Institute, viewed 12 April 2024,
Bice, S 2014, 'What Gives you a social licence an exploration of the social licence to operate in the Australian mining industry', Resources, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 62–80,
Boggs, G, Measham, T, Littleboy, A & Haslam McKenzie, F 2022, ‘Transformation for positive post mine futures’, in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2022: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 49–62,
Boutilier, R 2014, ‘Frequently asked questions about the social licence to operate’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 263–272.
Boutilier, R 2021, 'From metaphor to political spin: understanding criticisms of the social licence', The Extractive Industries and Society, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 263–272,
Brueckner, M & Eabrasu, M 2018, ‘Pinning down the social license to operate (SLO): The problem of normative complexity’, Resources Policy, vol. 59, pp. 217–226,
Caria, S & Domínguez, R 2016, 'Ecuador's "Buen vivir": a new ideology for development', Latin American Perspectives, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 18–33,
Dalziel, P 2019, ‘Wellbeing economics in public policy: a distinctive Australasian contribution?’, The Economic and Labour Relations Review, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 478–497,
Darko, R & Halseth, G 2023, ‘Mobilizing through local agency to support place-based economic transition: a case study of Tumbler Ridge, BC’, The Extractive Industries and Society, vol. 15, 101313,
Fordham, A, Robinson, G & Blackwell, B 2017, ‘Corporate social responsibility in resource companies – Opportunities for developing positive benefits and lasting legacies’, Resources Policy, vol. 52, pp. 366–376, .
009
Hamblin, L, Gardner, A & Haigh, Y 2022, Mapping the Regulatory Framework of Mine Closure, CRC TiME Limited, Perth.
Hodge, R & Brehaut, H 2023, ‘Towards a positive legacy: key questions to assess the adequacy of mine closure and post-closure’, Mineral Economics, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 181–186,
Holcombe, S, Elliott, V, Berryman, M, Keeling, A, Hall, R, Ngaamo, R, … Ross River Lands Office 2022, Indigenous Exchange Forum: Transition in Mine Closure, Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining, University of Queensland, St Lucia.
International Council on Mining and Metals 2019, Integrated Mine Closure: Good Practice Guide, 2nd edn, London.
Kemp, D & Owen, J 2013, ‘Community relations and mining: Core to business but not “core business”’, Resources Policy, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 523–531,
Kozłowska-Woszczycka, A & Pactwa, K 2022, ‘Social license for closure: a participatory approach to the management of the mine closure process’, Sustainability, vol. 14, no.11,
Kruse, J, Poppel, B, Abryutina, L, Duhaime, G, Martin, S, Poppel, M, … Hanna, V 2008, ‘Survey of living conditions in the Arctic (SLiCA)’, in V Møller, D Juschka & A Michalos (eds), Barometres of Quality of Life Around the Globe: How Are We Doing? Social Indicators Research Series, vol. 33, pp. 107–134, Springer, Heidelberg,
Kung, A, Everingham, J & Vivoda, V 2020, Social Aspects of Mine Closure: Governance & Regulation, Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining, the University of Queensland, Brisbane.
Lèbre, É, Owen, J, Stringer, M, Kemp, D & Valenta, R 2021, ‘Global scan of disruptions to the mine life cycle: price, ownership, and local impact’, Environmental Science & Technology, no. 8 , pp. 4324–4331,
Owen, J & Kemp, D 2013, ‘Social licence and mining: a critical perspective’, Resources Policy, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 29–35,
Parsons, R, Lacey, J & Moffat, K 2014, ‘Maintaining legitimacy of a contested practice: How the minerals industry understands its ‘social licence to operate'’, Resources Policy, vol. 41, pp. 83–90,
Prno, J 2013, ‘An analysis of factors leading to the establishment of a social licence to operate in the mining industry’, Resources Policy, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 577–590,
Prout, S 2012, ‘Indigenous wellbeing frameworks in Australia and the quest for quantification’, Social Indicators Research, vol. 109, pp. 317–336.
Reeves, J, Baumgartl, T, Morgan, D, Reimers, V & Green, M 2022, ‘Community capacity to envisage a post-mine future: rehabilitation options for Latrobe Valley brown coal mines’, in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2022: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 173–186,
Shetach, A 2014, ‘Using the Northern Star terminology to guide goal setting’, The Journal for Quality and Participation, vol. 38, no. 1.
Sommerville, K & Ferguson, K 2022, ‘Let’s reimagine our legacy of mining’, in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2022: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 318,
Stiglitz, J, Sen, A & Fitoussi, J 2009, Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress,
Taylor, J 2008, ‘Indigenous Peoples and indicators of well-being: Australian perspectives on United Nations Global Frameworks’, Social Indicators Research, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 111–126,
Thinley, J & Hartz-Karp, J 2019, ‘National progress, sustainability and higher goals: the case of Bhutan’s gross national happiness’, Sustainable Earth, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11,
Wall, L & Haslam McKenzie, F 2023, ‘Time for an outcome evaluation? The experience of indigenous communities with mining benefit sharing agreements’, International Development Policy, vol. 15,
Zvarivadza, T 2018, ‘Large scale miners - communities partnerships: a plausible option for communities survival beyond mine closure’, Resources Policy, vol. 56, pp. 87–94,




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au