Stakeholder engagement and ecosystem services for mine closure

Authors: Pan, Y; Duddigan, S; Devanadera, MCE; Tibbett, M

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_20

Cite As:
Pan, Y, Duddigan, S, Devanadera, MCE & Tibbett, M 2024, 'Stakeholder engagement and ecosystem services for mine closure', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2024: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 285-294, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_20

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Mine rehabilitation presents complex challenges that require balancing ecological restoration with community needs and expectations. This study explores the use of ecosystem services frameworks and community engagement approaches in mine rehabilitation planning, focusing on a case study at the Padcal mine site in the Philippines. As part of the Philippines Remediation of Mine Tailings (PROMT) project, we conducted a community workshop to assess local perceptions of ecosystem services and mine rehabilitation potential. Activities included educational presentations, focus groups and a questionnaire on ecosystem services. Results showed that 88% of participants understood the concept of ecosystem services after our introduction, with 62% perceiving negative mining impacts on these services. Importantly, 65% believed tailings could be rehabilitated to provide services such as agriculture or ecotourism. Gender differences emerged in perceptions, with women more likely to recognise mining impacts but also more optimistic about rehabilitation possibilities. Our participatory approach provides insights for developing mine rehabilitation strategies that integrate ecosystem service frameworks with community perspectives, potentially enhancing social acceptance and the long-term sustainability of rehabilitation efforts.

Keywords: community engagement, ecosystem services, mineral extraction, mine rehabilitation, mine tailings, stakeholder engagement

References:
Asah, ST, Guerry, AD, Blahna, DJ & Lawler, JJ 2014, ‘Perception, acquisition and use of ecosystem services: human behavior, and ecosystem management and policy implications’, Ecosystem Services, vol. 10, pp. 180–186.
Bainton, N & Holcombe, S 2018, ‘A critical review of the social aspects of mine closure’, Resources Policy, vol. 59, pp. 468–478.
Chaloping-March, M 2006, ‘Collaboration towards social sustainability: the case of a mining corporation, its surrounding communities, and local government in Benguet, Philippines’, International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 109–125.
Delorme, DE, Kidwell, D, Hagen, SC & Stephens, SH 2021, ‘Communicating and understanding ecosystem services assessment with coastal stakeholders: obstacles and opportunities’, Frontiers in Communication, vol. 6.
Domínguez, L & Luoma, C 2020, ‘Decolonising conservation policy: how colonial land and conservation ideologies persist and perpetuate indigenous injustices at the expense of the environment’, Land, vol. 9, no. 3.
Duddigan, S, Quimado, MO, Fernando, ES & Tibbett, M 2023, ‘The extent and applications of metal accumulation and hyperaccumulation in Philippine plants’, Australian Journal of Botany, vol. 9, pp. 537–545.
Government of Western Australia 2020, Mine Closure Plan Guidance – How to Prepare in Accordance with Part 1 of the Statutory Guidelines for Mine Closure Plans, Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety, Perth.
Heller, NE, Herren, CM, Barton, J, Biango-Daniels, MN, Buser, CJ, Carman, KR, … Trisos, CH 2023, ‘Including stewardship in ecosystem health assessment’, Nature Sustainability, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 731–741.
Holden, W, Nadeau, K & Jacobson, RD 2016, ‘Exemplifying accumulation by dispossession: mining and indigenous peoples in the Philippines’, Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 141–161.
ICMM 2019, Integrated Mine Closure: Good Practice Guide, 2nd edn.
Jenkin, GRT, Gibaga, CR, Swift, R, Tanciongco, AM, Gervasio, JHC, Quierrez, RNM, … Yan, Y 2024 ‘Recent developments in the science and technology of in situ solvent leaching of tailings for reprocessing, rehabilitation and closure’, in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2024: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mine, Closure Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 29–44.
Kenter, JO, Raymond, CM, van Riper, CJ, Azzopardi, E, Brear, MR, Calcagni, F, … Ives, CD 2019, ‘Loving the mess: navigating diversity and conflict in social values for sustainability’, Sustainability Science, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1439–1461.
Klain, SC, Olmsted, P, Chan, KMA & Satterfield, T 2017, ‘Relational values resonate broadly and differently than intrinsic or instrumental values, or the new ecological paradigm’, PLoS ONE, vol. 12, no. 8, e0183962.
Lahiri-Dutt, K 2015, ‘The feminisation of mining’, Geography Compass, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 523–541.
Lechner, AM, McIntyre, N, Witt, K, Raymond, CM, Arnold, S, Scott, M & Rifkin, W 2017, ‘Challenges of integrated modelling in mining regions to address social, environmental and economic impacts’, Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 93, pp. 268–281.
Neves, ACO, Nunes, FP, de Carvalho, FA & Fernandes, GW2016, ‘Neglect of ecosystems services by mining, and the worst environmental disaster in Brazil’, Natureza e Conservacao, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 24–27.
Rosa, JCS & Sánchez, LE 2016, ‘Advances and challenges of incorporating ecosystem services into impact assessment’, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 180, pp. 485–492.
Rosa, JCS, Sánchez, LE & Morrison-Saunders, A 2020, ‘Planning mine restoration through ecosystem services to enhance community engagement and deliver social benefits’, Restoration Ecology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 937–946.
Subiza-Pérez, M, Santa-Marina, L, Irizar, A, Gallastegi, M, Anabitarte, A, Urbieta, N, … Ibarluzea, J 2020, ‘Who feels a greater environmental risk? Women, younger adults and pro-environmentally friendly people express higher concerns about a set of environmental exposures’, Environmental Research, vol. 181, 108918.
Tibbett, M 2024, ‘Post-mining ecosystem reconstruction’, Primer, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. PR387–R393,
j.cub.2024.03.065
van der Plank, S, Walsh, B & Behrens, P 2016, ‘The expected impacts of mining: Stakeholder perceptions of a proposed mineral sands mine in rural Australia’, Resources Policy, vol. 48, pp. 129–136.
Younger, PL, Coulton, RH & Froggatt, EC 2005, ‘The contribution of science to risk-based decision-making: lessons from the development of full-scale treatment measures for acidic mine waters at Wheal Jane, UK’, Science of the Total Environment, vol. 338, no. 1–2, pp. 137–154.
Zipper, C, Burger, J, Skousen, J, Angel, P, Barton, C, Davis, V & Franklin, J 2011, ‘Restoring forests and associated ecosystem services on Appalachian coal surface mines’, Environmental Management, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 751–765.




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au